Gay Grooming in the public schools

[Dogmaphobe]

Frankly, I really wouldn’t want you near my kids much less teaching them.

You do not own other people's children.

Stop inflicting your sickness upon them, you soulless creature.

 

[Coyote]

You do not own other people's children.

Stop inflicting your sickness upon them, you soulless creature.

Look who’s talking about owning children when my comment was only on my own.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Look who’s talking about owning children when my comment was only on my own.

You do not own other people's children.

None of your other comments here have been limited to your own.

Stop inflicting your sickness upon other people's children, you soulless creature.

 

[Coyote]

You do not own other people's children.

None of your other comments here have been limited to your own.

Stop inflicting your sickness upon other people's children, you soulless creature.

You don’t own anyone’s children. They are not property.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

You don’t own anyone’s children. They are not property.

Obviously, I don't.

That's why I rally against you soulless creatures who are hell bent on sexualizing them and turning them into mindless woke automatons.

Stop inflicting your sickness on other people's children.

 

[Concerned American]

Child grooming

So now you want to throw another word in the definition. There has been NO mention of "child" grooming in ANY of my posts. Your perverted mind put it in there. I have been very clear in EVERY post that I have made that school districts have no business subverting parental rights in secret. Your very defense of this action makes you the guilty party, not me. Conscience finally getting the better of you. I think this very board and the responses that you've gotten to your perverted definition tell it all. You're a real piece of work.

 

[Concerned American]

You don’t own anyone’s children. They are not property.

I have the responsibility to protect and care for my children, making sure that perverts cannot harm them or lead them astray.

 

[Coyote]

Obviously, I don't.

That's why I rally against you soulless creatures who are hell bent on sexualizing them and turning them into mindless woke automatons.

You keep on telling yourself that if helps you sleep better at night.

Providing the facts about when puberty begins is not sexualizing children. All it is is a marker of when discussions, in an age appropriate way, might begin. It is a hell of a lot better than leaving an ostracized bullied child who is “different” isolated, thinking something is wrong with him rather than helping him fit in. It is better for child understand the that his or her body is sacrosanct and he/she has a right to say no to or report inappropriate touching, and that consent matters rather than leaving him/her at risk of coercion or vulnerable to sexual predators. You obsess about “sexualizing” them yet are completely oblivious to what it takes to actually protect them.

 

[Coyote]

So now you want to throw another word in the definition. There has been NO mention of "child" grooming in ANY of my posts. Your perverted mind put it in there. I have been very clear in EVERY post that I have made that school districts have no business subverting parental rights in secret. Your very defense of this action makes you the guilty party, not me. Conscience finally getting the better of you. I think this very board and the responses that you've gotten to your perverted definition tell it all. You're a real piece of work.

Groomer. Grooming. In relation to children, it is almost always associated with pedos. You know this. Why else are you fighting so hard to insist on using that word against posters, in a discussion involving children and sex when other words could be used? You want to call members pedo, and you are pissed when you get called on it.

And your dictionary gamble failed. I didn’t even use tbe ‘urban dictionary”. Just give it up and quit trying to find ways of calling other members pedos.

 

[Coyote]

I have the responsibility to protect and care for my children, making sure that perverts cannot harm them or lead them astray.

You absolutely do.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

You keep on telling yourself that if helps you sleep better at night.

Providing the facts about when puberty begins is not sexualizing children. All it is is a marker of when discussions, in an age appropriate way, might begin. It is a hell of a lot better than leaving an ostracized bullied child who is “different” isolated, thinking something is wrong with him rather than helping him fit in. It is better for child understand the that his or her body is sacrosanct and he/she has a right to say no to or report inappropriate touching, and that consent matters rather than leaving him/her at risk of coercion or vulnerable to sexual predators. You obsess about “sexualizing” them yet are completely oblivious to what it takes to actually protect them.

You do not own other people's children.

Let children be children and stop indoctrinating them into your transphilia mass psychosis.

 

[Concerned American]

In relation to children, it is almost always associated with pedos.

In a thread about a "transition closet" in public schools? Try again. You have a perverted mind.

 

[Concerned American]

You absolutely do.

That includes doing everything in my power to stop a school district that is bent on subverting my parental rights.

 

[Coyote]

In a thread about a "transition closet" in public schools? Try again. You have a perverted mind.

I’m going by what the dictionaries state.

 

[Coyote]

That includes doing everything in my power to stop a school district that is bent on subverting my parental rights.

Cool. That to is your right.

 

[Concerned American]

Groomer. Grooming. In relation to children, it is almost always associated with pedos. You know this. Why else are you fighting so hard to insist on using that word against posters, in a discussion involving children and sex when other words could be used? You want to call members pedo, and you are pissed when you get called on it.

And your dictionary gamble failed. I didn’t even use tbe ‘urban dictionary”. Just give it up and quit trying to find ways of calling other members pedos.

Nope you used wikipedia--which is worse by far as ANYONE can change ANY definition in wikipedia.

 

[Coyote]

You do not own other people's children.

Let children be children and stop indoctrinating them into your transphilia mass psychosis.

You have said that what…four times already? What is with your obsession on owning children? I agreed with you. I don’t anyone’s children. Nor do you. Children are NOT property to be “owned”.

 

[Coyote]

Nope you used wikipedia--which is worse by far as ANYONE can change ANY definition in wikipedia.

Read post 220. It does not contain Wikipedia.

 

[Concerned American]

I’m going by what the dictionaries state.

Your dictionaries are twisted. I have been calling the people who run the piston bullies at ski resorts groomers for 50 years and never--not once has anyone accused me of calling them a pedophile. I suppose you'll be telling me there are 86 genders next.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Read post 220. It does not contain Wikipedia.

See post 315.