Democrats push Trans bill of rights

[Rawley]

It must terrify you.

It does. That that many Democrat House representatives support this experimentation on kids is frightening.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

It does. That that many Democrat House representatives support this experimentation on kids is frightening.

......and not only do they not even know why they support the genital mutilation of children, they cannot even realize there was a time in their life when they DIDN'T.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Figures the democrats would come up with this lame Bill that won't get
through the court system once it passes through a liberal judges court.

Sorry! Come again? That makes no sense.

 

[Invisibleflash]

Congressional Democrats Introduce 'Trans Bill of Rights' Protecting Child Mutilation

Congressional Democrats introduce a Trans Bill of Rights amid fierce debate on child gender surgeries and rights.

hotair.com

(Snippet)
The radical left is simply not going to let the Democratic Party "move to the center" on this issue; the most it will allow is the Spanberger move—you may hedge a bit during the campaign, but if so, you must bow down entirely when in office.

Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) says his “Trans Bill of Rights” says children should be allowed to have elective gender surgeries and get documents that say they’re a different gender than their chromosomes dictate.Markey is shamefully promoting harm, not care.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) ridiculously says that critics of men pretending to be women are just jealous of them.She said this as she promoted her Trans Bill of Rights.Jayapal wants to push her extremist gender ideology onto your children.

The average Democrat may not support sterilizing and mutilating kids, but it is now clear that they will not vote on the issue. The radicals will vote on the issue, so their opinion matters. Few Democrats can afford to buck the will of the revolutionaries, while remaining confident that the rest of their voters will not punish them for giving in to the radical demands.

Transgender Minnesota Dem says restricting kids from porn is harmful because it might be "educational if they are queer."This is the hill they're dying on.Age verification is oppression because some kids might need adult content for... education.

Comment:
The LGBT can do whatever they want to do.
However when they start bothering other people they cross a line.
Parents have the right and responsibility to protect their children from harm.
The radical Left believe that the Trans issues will help the Democrats.
The moderate Democrats are intimidated by the Radicals.
This issue is unpopular with the Mainstream voters.

Wait till dems get power.

 

[Meister]

Sorry! Come again? That makes no sense.

A liberal district judge will render his/her verdict against it, and then it will
go through the appeals process to overturn the lower courts decision.

I hope that clarifies it for you.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

No one should be surprised that the mentally ill do mentally ill things

Trans is a scam democrats push on mentally ill as part of their intentional collapse of America agenda.

Trans is a way to dope up mentally ill people and turn them into terrorists that attack Americans and America.

All done intentionally and knowingly by their WEF masters.

Democrats = perverted freaks

 

[Meister]

View attachment 1221408


Wait till dems get power.


View attachment 1221412

This is what a communist would say.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Sickos..the lot of em

Transgender, Transracial Activist Empowers Pedophiles​

Posted on February 21, 2026
Minnesota isn’t the only place where transsexuals have progressed to openly advocating the corruption of children’s innocence. Reduxx reports from Seattle:

Ally Kotetsu, who describes himself as “a non-binary transgender woman who is transrace Japanese,” is campaigning both online and in public through an effort he calls Beyond the Plus, which advocates for the rights of “beings who are romantically or sexually attracted to beings who are below the age of 18.”

The word “rights” now means “power and privilege.” A Caucasian guy claiming to be a Japanese woman wants to empower fellow pedophiles.

As with everything else progressives want to promote, they have a euphemism to make it sound less evil:

Kotetsu’s website describes “minor attraction” as an orientation and refers to individuals with a sexual interest in children as “MAPs” (minor attracted people). According to Beyond the Plus, “MAPs” are some of “the world’s most marginalized beings.”

The more “marginalized” an identity group, the higher it ranks in the Cultural Marxist caste system.

The site goes on to describe “age-based attractions” as being innate and similar to heterosexuality or homosexuality.

Makes sense. If homosexuality is not behavior but an innate identity — which is the argument used to bully dupes into accepting it — the same goes for all other aberrant behavior.

To the already crowded LGBT calendar, the Beyond the Plus (B+) website adds “Alice Day” on April 25, evidently focusing on the sexual molestation of underage girls.

Kotetsu has also worked with site administrators for transid.org, a website that lists various sexual fetishes and paraphilias. Under a category labeled “age-related,” dozens of pages are dedicated to various aspects of pedophilia, including: “boylove,” “girlove,” “incest MAP,” “autoMAP,” and “MAP-necro-incestual,” referring to a combination of incestuous child sexual abuse combined with necrophilia.

His fellow transsexual Violet Rose is listed as the lead journalist on the B+ website.

Rose also advocates for “pedosadism,” a portmanteau of “pedophilia” and “sadism,” which refers to acting out sadomasochistic sexual practices on children.

The goal must be to achieve maximum moonbattery, the point at which not even the wokest liberals can imagine depths of sickness more horrifying than what has already been achieved.

On a tip from Jester. Hat tip: Not the Bee.

 

[j-mac]

These are the "ideas" Democrats come up with at this time? How sad.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Congressional Democrats Introduce 'Trans Bill of Rights' Protecting Child Mutilation

Congressional Democrats introduce a Trans Bill of Rights amid fierce debate on child gender surgeries and rights.

hotair.com

(Snippet)
The radical left is simply not going to let the Democratic Party "move to the center" on this issue; the most it will allow is the Spanberger move—you may hedge a bit during the campaign, but if so, you must bow down entirely when in office.

Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) says his “Trans Bill of Rights” says children should be allowed to have elective gender surgeries and get documents that say they’re a different gender than their chromosomes dictate.Markey is shamefully promoting harm, not care.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) ridiculously says that critics of men pretending to be women are just jealous of them.She said this as she promoted her Trans Bill of Rights.Jayapal wants to push her extremist gender ideology onto your children.

The average Democrat may not support sterilizing and mutilating kids, but it is now clear that they will not vote on the issue. The radicals will vote on the issue, so their opinion matters. Few Democrats can afford to buck the will of the revolutionaries, while remaining confident that the rest of their voters will not punish them for giving in to the radical demands.

Transgender Minnesota Dem says restricting kids from porn is harmful because it might be "educational if they are queer."This is the hill they're dying on.Age verification is oppression because some kids might need adult content for... education.

Comment:
The LGBT can do whatever they want to do.
However when they start bothering other people they cross a line.
Parents have the right and responsibility to protect their children from harm.
The radical Left believe that the Trans issues will help the Democrats.
The moderate Democrats are intimidated by the Radicals.
This issue is unpopular with the Mainstream voters.

All I know is that so many leftists on here continue to claim none of this is happening, when their mainstream presidents, vice presidents, and politicians continually outwardly support it.

Trans ideology wants their grooming of children on the down low. They'll call you crazy that you'd suggest the idea, then continue their grooming in secret, or just keep the suggestion out of the overton window so the practice can continue. . It seems like they think it's a trans underground railroad or something.. except this one isn't to freedom, it's to physical and psychological harm, depression, distress, etc.

 

[task0778]

It's called pandering to voters in an election year, specifically the LGBTQ community, trying to get out those voters to support the party and donate some money. BUT - it also alienates a lot of people in the Center that aren't too crazy about this effort, so I'm not sure if there is much of a positive net result.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

A liberal district judge will render his/her verdict against it, and then it will
go through the appeals process to overturn the lower courts decision.

I hope that clarifies it for you.

Judges dont render verdicts on laws until someone files a case and has standing to make a law unconstitutional. Your statement still makes no sense.

 

[Meister]

Judges dont render verdicts on laws until someone files a case and has standing to make a law unconstitutional. Your statement still makes no sense.

Then just deal with it, Tory. I'm just an obscure poster.
You probably felt that Trump's convictions were legitimate with the way the Judges handled them.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Then just deal with it, Tory. I'm just an obscure poster.
You probably felt that Trump's convictions were legitimate with the way the Judges handled them.

No, you are simply making an assumption that is not in evidence. Judges cannot rule on a law unless there is a case to rule on.

 

[Meister]

No, you are simply making an assumption that is not in evidence. Judges cannot rule on a law unless there is a case to rule on.

Assumption? What law was Trump convicted on in NYC? That judge manipulated that trial
to get his desired outcome.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Assumption? What law was Trump convicted on in NYC? That judge manipulated that trial
to get his desired outcome.

Yes, and it will eventually be overturned on appeal.

What does that have to do with a law that hasn't even been passed and signed?

 

[Failzero]

A Pedo / NAMBLA / MAP bill of rights on deck

 

[Ringo]

What a creep!

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

Congressional Democrats Introduce 'Trans Bill of Rights' Protecting Child Mutilation

Congressional Democrats introduce a Trans Bill of Rights amid fierce debate on child gender surgeries and rights.

hotair.com

(Snippet)
The radical left is simply not going to let the Democratic Party "move to the center" on this issue; the most it will allow is the Spanberger move—you may hedge a bit during the campaign, but if so, you must bow down entirely when in office.

Sen. Ed Markey (D-MA) says his “Trans Bill of Rights” says children should be allowed to have elective gender surgeries and get documents that say they’re a different gender than their chromosomes dictate.Markey is shamefully promoting harm, not care.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) ridiculously says that critics of men pretending to be women are just jealous of them.She said this as she promoted her Trans Bill of Rights.Jayapal wants to push her extremist gender ideology onto your children.

The average Democrat may not support sterilizing and mutilating kids, but it is now clear that they will not vote on the issue. The radicals will vote on the issue, so their opinion matters. Few Democrats can afford to buck the will of the revolutionaries, while remaining confident that the rest of their voters will not punish them for giving in to the radical demands.

Transgender Minnesota Dem says restricting kids from porn is harmful because it might be "educational if they are queer."This is the hill they're dying on.Age verification is oppression because some kids might need adult content for... education.

Comment:
The LGBT can do whatever they want to do.
However when they start bothering other people they cross a line.
Parents have the right and responsibility to protect their children from harm.
The radical Left believe that the Trans issues will help the Democrats.
The moderate Democrats are intimidated by the Radicals.
This issue is unpopular with the Mainstream voters.

there are approximately 214 House Democrats. If roughly 100 signed on as co-sponsors, that means around 114 Democrats — more than half — did not co-sign it.

So the majority of House Democrats actually stayed off the resolution.

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

If you vote for the democrats, this is what you can expect. And that ain't all either.

What if they vote for one of the 114 democrats who didn't co-sign the bill?