- Nov 14, 2011
- 120,869
- 65,754
- 2,635
Keep up with that, it's serving you so well....
LOL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Keep up with that, it's serving you so well....
LOL
Not as much as you.Yes, because the government never lies.....
Would have been nice to prove all of that in an open trial, but the government decided to whitewash the whole thing and bury all the documents related to the "investigation" as deep as they could.
I would hope a Republican Congress could re-open this, but what will probably happen is Biden will pardon the shooter as soon as there is even a chance of a full investigation done by someone other than deep state hacks.
Not as much as you.
Your bullshit is exposed.
Both Houses of Congress and both the outgoing and incoming Vice President. That is most of the damn government doofusNo, behind it was the legislature, not the executive, not the judiciary.
A crazed woman breaking through a barricade in the face of drawn guns wearing a backpack.wow, now claiming she had a bomb?
My response said it all. You're fucked in the head.If that's all you got as a response, then you have no response.
Both Houses of Congress and both the outgoing and incoming Vice President. That is most of the damn government doofus
A crazed woman breaking through a barricade in the face of drawn guns wearing a backpack.
That absolutely suggests a suicide bomber
My response said it all. You're fucked in the head.
You're story is bullshit. Byrd spoke with investigators. Just not without a lawyer present.
Why ask me? Ask the Department of Justice.So where's the transcript?
The minute I saw that she had a backpack on while breaching that barricade...and any LEO worth a shit would have been thinking the sameThe VP in this situation is part of the legislature.
That's the first I've heard of the "she had explosives" trope, think it all up yourself?
Why ask me? Ask the Department of Justice.
The minute I saw that she had a backpack on while breaching that barricade...and any LEO worth a shit would have been thinking the same
I already posted a link showing he spoke with investigators. You'll have to jump through your own hoops if you want more information.You are the one saying there is an actual interview, where he actually talked. Where is the transcript?
It's not like the information has to be withheld due to prosecutorial needs.....
I already posted a link showing he spoke with investigators. You'll have to jump through your own hoops if you want more information.
More noise, Marty? I already showed you he spoke with the DoJ.No references, no transcript.
The same people are also the ones who didn't release his name for months.
More noise, Marty? I already showed you he spoke with the DoJ.
Wrong again, idiot. They said information they gathered included statements from him.You showed the DOJ saying they spoke with him, nothing about him replying other than to say "I have no statement to make"
Again, a Transcript would settle this argument.
Wrong again, idiot. They said information they gathered included statements from him.
That wouldn't be information. If you want the transcripts, ask them.Which could be "I have no Statement to make"
Where are the transcripts?