- Moderator
- #161
Nnnnno.You guys are really milking this. It's just a ruse as to interfere with the deportation of illegals.
In fact (at least for me) it's a plea for constitutional conservatives to start acting like constitutional conservatives.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nnnnno.You guys are really milking this. It's just a ruse as to interfere with the deportation of illegals.
Moi, a liberal?
My friend, you have no idea what I am. Just because I take a liberal stance on one issue does not necessarily mean I will take a liberal stance on another.
I honestly thought more people around here would appreciate someone who actually took positions on both sides of the political spectrum...
Great, you have something in common with Van Hollen.Perhaps, if I actually cared for people who use others as props to feign care for them.
I have said this of both sides.You're being too generous to them, you're not taking a "liberal" stance on this issue. You're taking a constitutional and principled stance... which is what conservatives USED TO be about. These days? It's more about partisanship, sadly.
As I've been saying on other threads... if we play fast and loose with doing things the legal and constitutional way with those we don't like... we're only shooting ourselves in the foot, because that precedent that is set will almost certainly come back to bite us in the arse. That's already happened, and will only get worse if things keep going this way.
Was that supposed to anger me?Great, you have something in common with Van Hollen.
Here you go...You used it, explain your version for us. What makes trump and us fascist
Geeze, Marc, you surprised me, you're talking about the democrats.Here you go...
Or even...
Do you have a different understanding of the word?
You seem to be confused . Freedom of the press is in regards to the government.. not corporationsHow free is the Western Press, you ******* dumbass?
How many corporations control it?
Free press died sometime in the 1990s, idiot.
Usually, a judge would not order a mistrial for prosecutorial misconduct. It would be a directed verdict of not guilty.For the same reason a judge would demand a re-trial due to prosecutorial misconduct.
In this case, the authority violated an order. Thus it invalidates the charge of illegal entry. It has to be retried. No ifs, ands, or buts.
Trump did no such thing. It was an administrative error. The situation that resulted in him that order issued is no longer applicable, as such the order is void.His due process was violated because Trump violated a court order forbidding his deportation to El Salvador.
Right a sensible question and you might get an answer. I think you left out some words.So tell me, what due process what he given that wasn't violated by his deportation to a forbidden country under court order?
Anyone? ANYONE?
"fact based reporting" my ass.
You twits are just pissed you're not allowed to make shit up and run with it as much anymore.
Fear not my fucked up little lefty- there are still plenty of lying, lefty, degenerate shitheads left in what you guys call journalism.

Such as?Right a sensible question and you might get an answer. I think you left out some words.
An error that wound up violating a court order. That gets it thrown out. It needs to be retried.Trump did no such thing. It was an administrative error.
There was no trial, dumbass! he was never accused of anything other than being an illegal. That was all that was required.An error that wound up violating a court order. That gets it thrown out. It needs to be retried.
Usually, a judge would not order a mistrial for prosecutorial misconduct. It would be a directed verdict of not guilty.
Try reading it and see if it makes sense to you. If it does, something is wrong.Such as?