- Dec 16, 2017
- 24,209
- 13,205
- 1,290
Abrego-Garcia Case Dismissed
- Thread starter Lesh
- Start date
You asked about his report. He wasn't in charge of the investigation started under Biden.
Not according to Cato.
Post #289
The case brought against him by the DOJ was vindictive and thrown out. So whatever they claim is untrustworthy...
Gemini A/I
A federal judge officially ruled that the Department of Justice brought vindictive, selective human smuggling charges against Kilmar Armando Ábrego García. The judge found that the government reopened a closed 2022 traffic stop case solely to punish him for successfully challenging his wrongful 2025 deportation to El Salvador. While the DOJ denied wrongdoing and plans to appeal, the court threw out the indictment because the prosecution was deemed politically motivated rather than a legitimate criminal case.
Gemini A/I
A federal judge officially ruled that the Department of Justice brought vindictive, selective human smuggling charges against Kilmar Armando Ábrego García. The judge found that the government reopened a closed 2022 traffic stop case solely to punish him for successfully challenging his wrongful 2025 deportation to El Salvador. While the DOJ denied wrongdoing and plans to appeal, the court threw out the indictment because the prosecution was deemed politically motivated rather than a legitimate criminal case.
Proof? Because it was only after bigots like me lost power that things went to shit in this country, funny how works.
His brain isn’t, that’s for damn sure.
Your side has lied about numbers for years, no one believes you.
They'll win on appeal. There's evidence of his trafficking.
WorldWatcher
Platinum Member
Anything can happen on appeal, but the appeal isn't about did he commit the offense. The vindictive prosecution is based on whether the prosecution was just. DOJ had the traffic stop for years, closed the case and only reopened it to prosecute Abrego Garcia when he embarrassed the President and DOJ. The appeal will be based not on the traffic stop, but whether the prosecution was vindictive which is clearly was.
And No, it wasn't human trafficking. Which under the law has a very specific meaning.
He wasn't charged with Human Trafficking (18 U.S. Code § 1590 - Trafficking with respect to peonage, slavery, involuntary servitude, or forced labor).
He was charged under 8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens. Commonly referrred to as human smuggling.
The difference is that human trafficing involves forced slave labor and often protestution of women. Which is not the case here. The charge is "human smugglindsg" which typically involes voluntary movement of illegal aliens for financial gain from one location to another.
WW
Charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia
US District Court Middle District of Tennessee
www.documentcloud.org
8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
It was TSP who did the stop not DOJ.
DOJ has the right to 'vindictive prosecution'.
They have evidence of his long term involvement trafficking.
WorldWatcher
Platinum Member
I didn't say DOJ "did" the stop, I said they "had" the stop for years.
No they don't.
Government entities don't have rights, people have rights. Government entities have powers.
He wasn't charged with trafficking.
WW
So what?
Long term involvement.
Yeah, ask Paul Manafort about vindictive prosecutions.
WorldWatcher
Platinum Member
You seemed to think it was important.
So what? Doesn't change movement of illegals (smuggling) into slave labor and forced prostitution (trafficking). See previous post on what he was actually charged with for the difference.
Look instead at the court records from the trial and appeal. The judges laughed at him and said "get out'ta here".
WW
JoeB131
Diamond Member
Really? It seems to me that we gained 16.6 million new jobs, ended Covid, Crime decreased, and the biggest thing you had to worry about was that some Transgender Girl was playing badminton.
You went out of your way to try and make it pertinent.
My point is and was he was muling Mexicans outa Texas long term and had been under investigation for trafficking and that's why TSP was told to lay off.
They only charged him with smuggling. Guarantee the investigation was focused on trafficking.
Bondi mentioned they had evidence of long term involvement previously.
JoeB131
Diamond Member
Bondi claimed a lot of things trying to please her Orange God. Not that it did her much good.
It's spelled out in Garcia's indictment Einstein.
JoeB131
Diamond Member
You mean the one the judge threw out because it was pure bullshit?
Not why the charges were dropped. Stop lying.
WorldWatcher
Platinum Member
With no evidence or mention of evidence other than the TSP stop and the word of an informant that got a sweetheart deal for making claims.
Please show us in the indictment dates, times, locations other than the TSP stop. Not the "claimes" but the actual date, times, locations.
If I were Abrego Garcia's attorney, I'd already - and given that Abrego Garcia was given legal authorization to work and was a union apprentice - I'd have work schedules, tax forms (W-2's, 1099's), EE and ER Social Security records for FICA taxes, and employer/union time and labor records, bank records, credit card records, etc. that show his location activity ready to go.
WW
Similar threads
New Topics
-
James Woods Posted 13 Lines That the Democrat Party Cannot Answer- Started by Stryder50
- Replies: 1
-
-
-
-
