Freedom of the Press? Not Any More

He didnt break their rules. Are you not paying attention to our discussion?
They say he did. End of discussion. Their house, their rules.
 

Their house. Their rules
and we know now, the reality was that the Demafacist billionaires that owned twitter were acting on orders to censor anything that harmed the Demafascsit party...hence why they banned Trump, and censored news.

That is what an assault on Free Press really looks like.

Remember when Xiden and the Demafacist tried to create a Orwellian Ministry of Truth? https://ago.mo.gov/wp-content/uploads/missouri-v-biden-ruling.pdf

The Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits in establishing that the Government has used its power to silence the opposition. Opposition to COVID-19 vaccines; opposition to COVID-19 masking and lockdowns; opposition to the lab-leak theory of COVID-19; opposition to the validity of the 2020 election; opposition to President Biden’s policies; statements that the Hunter Biden laptop story was true; and opposition to policies of the government officials in power. All were suppressed. It is quite telling that each example or category of suppressed speech was conservative in nature. This targeted suppression of conservative ideas is a perfect example of viewpoint discrimination of political speech. American citizens have the right to engage in free debate about the significant issues affecting the country. Although this case is still relatively young, and at this stage the Court is only examining it in terms of Plaintiffs’ likelihood of success on the merits, the evidence produced thus far depicts an almost dystopian scenario. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a period perhaps best characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the United States Government seems to have assumed a role similar to an Orwellian “Ministry of Truth.”721 The Plaintiffs have presented substantial evidence in support of their claims that they were the victims of a far-reaching and widespread censorship campaign.
 
Here's what it means: Is Obama Criminalizing National Security Reporting?

The Obama Justice Department’s crusade against leakers just took a quantum leap—and it’s extremely worrisome.

It’s one thing to go after officials who leak classified information to the press. The Obama administration has gone after more of them than all previous administrations combined. Nonetheless, officials with security clearances sign a contract pledging not to share material with the outside world—and they know they could face criminal penalties if they do. (Daniel Ellsberg figured he might go to prison for leaking the Pentagon Papers and was willing to make the sacrifice.)

However, it’s something else entirely to go after a reporter who receives the leak. That’s what federal prosecutors are doing to James Rosen, the chief Washington correspondent for Fox News. And they’re going after him not as a witness to a crime—nor as a pressure tactic to get him to give up his source (in this case, the source has already been caught)—but rather, in the words of a Justice Department affidavit, as “an aider, an abettor, and/or a co-conspirator”: in short, as someone who might be indicted under the Espionage Act.
All done in the effort to gather information on the creep who WAS indicted and convicted.
 
America is currently engaged in creeping fascism.

Except it's going a bit faster than creeping.
False. No fascism at all.

You’d know that if you knew )or gave a shit about) the actual meaning of words, Malcolm ExLax.
 
False. No fascism at all.

You’d know that if you knew )or gave a shit about) the actual meaning of words, Malcolm ExLax.
Post your understand of what fascism means.
 
Post your understand of what fascism means.

This:

1745423885987.webp
 
Rosen was not charged
Rosen was not indicted

He did act in concert with this creep


Who was indicted and rightfully so.
And not a single "journalist" has even been investigated under Trump. Yet you're birthing kittens because of a single tweet. You're a hoot Lush, a hoot.
 
Why do you believe this is accurate and authoritative description of fascism?
Because it accurately describes what fascists did throughout history.

Which one of those characteristics are wrong?
 
All done in the effort to gather information on the creep who WAS indicted and convicted.
He was already indicted. It was a war on reporters, it was done to intimate anyone that would dare to report truthful on the Obama admin.

Dems hate the free press, they hate the entire first amendment, and the entire bill of rights.
 
Back
Top Bottom