Freedom of the Press? Not Any More

[Lesh]

Twitter bans President Trump’s account | CNN Business

Twitter has suspended President Trump from its platform, the company said Friday evening.

amp.cnn.com

Their house. Their rules

 

[RetiredGySgt]

“The government puts you up to it”..

The government does not control twatter. They issued no order. Passed no law

No they asked and got it it was done because Biden wanted it done. And cite for us what rule he broke to get banned?

 

[Frankenstein]

who's pride?

Whomever you were addressing in post #115

 

[Billiejeens]

Whomever you were addressing in post #115

Gotcha

No one in particular really on that one.

Stream of consciousness, really -

 

[Frankenstein]

Gotcha

No one in particular really on that one.

Stream of consciousness, really -

It is an easy thing to say about most Liberal progressives

 

[struth]

Again.. publish classified information and you get investigated.
Not unreasonable

They didn’t just investigate the leak, they attempted to indict the reporter

For publishing facts

No. Not just like…

The Constitution says that the house belongs to all of us and the government can not infringe on a free press… or free speech.

You can make any rules you want in YOUR HOUSE.

The government in not YOUR house

You seem profoundly confused about the Constitution

No, the Constitution does not say that the country belongs to all of us, just the citizens of this country. In fact, it specifically states that the Congress can make laws regarding naturalization. Once again, you are wrong.

Agreed the Govt can't infringe on free press, that's what I've been saying and why the assult by Obama, Xiden and the demafacist was so horrifying.

The Constitution creates the Federal Govt, the Govt is designed to run the House.

 

[struth]

Classified facts

Not sure your point? A free press is allowed to report on facts that are leaked to them. You seem profoundly confused on what a free press is

 

[Lesh]

Not sure your point? A free press is allowed to report on facts that are leaked to them. You seem profoundly confused on what a free press is

If they publish classified information they will get investigated.And rightfully so. It’s always been that way

That’s a fact.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

If they publish classified information they will get investigated.And rightfully so. It’s always been that way

That’s a fact.

I see you keep ignoring the point.

 

[Lesh]

They didn’t just investigate the leak, they attempted to indict the reporter

For publishing facts

No, the Constitution does not say that the country belongs to all of us, just the citizens of this country. In fact, it specifically states that the Congress can make laws regarding naturalization. Once again, you are wrong.

Agreed the Govt can't infringe on free press, that's what I've been saying and why the assult by Obama, Xiden and the demafacist was so horrifying.

The Constitution creates the Federal Govt, the Govt is designed to run the House.

Hey stupid… the word “citizen” does not appear on the Constitution

 

[Lesh]

They didn’t just investigate the leak, they attempted to indict the reporter

For publishing facts

No, the Constitution does not say that the country belongs to all of us, just the citizens of this country. In fact, it specifically states that the Congress can make laws regarding naturalization. Once again, you are wrong.

Agreed the Govt can't infringe on free press, that's what I've been saying and why the assult by Obama, Xiden and the demafacist was so horrifying.

The Constitution creates the Federal Govt, the Govt is designed to run the House.

“Attempted to indict”

What does that even mean?

 

[Lesh]

Rosen was not charged
Rosen was not indicted

He did act in concert with this creep

Stephen Jin-Woo Kim - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

Who was indicted and rightfully so.

 

[M14 Shooter]

If they publish classified information they will get investigated.And rightfully so. It’s always been that way
That’s a fact.

So you agree:

 

[Nostra]

I just googled “free press”.

Zero results. I guess it’s gone.

 

[Lesh]

So you agree:

View attachment 1103403

If they write about classified information they will be investigated

That’s NOT what Trump is proposing

He’s talking about prosecutions of journalists who publish shit he doesn’t LIKE

 

[M14 Shooter]

If they write about classified information they will be investigated

So, the correct answer to your question:
Depends entirely on what they write.
Just like I said.
Glad you agree.

He’s talking about prosecutions of journalists who publish shit he doesn’t LIKE

Not according to the story you posted in the OP.
If you had read it, you'd know that.

 

[berg80]

No they asked and got it it was done because Biden wanted it done. And cite for us what rule he broke to get banned?

Read Twitter's statement.

 

[struth]

If they publish classified information they will get investigated.And rightfully so. It’s always been that way

That’s a fact.

Provide us with another example of a reporter being indicted as a co-conspirator in a criminal case because they reported information leaked to them....

 

[struth]

Hey stupid… the word “citizen” does not appear on the Constitution

Geez man, you really are clueless....maybe you should read it: The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription

You can't even get through the third paragraph of Art 1 wihtout it popping up.

 

[struth]

“Attempted to indict”

What does that even mean?

Here's what it means: Is Obama Criminalizing National Security Reporting?

The Obama Justice Department’s crusade against leakers just took a quantum leap—and it’s extremely worrisome.

It’s one thing to go after officials who leak classified information to the press. The Obama administration has gone after more of them than all previous administrations combined. Nonetheless, officials with security clearances sign a contract pledging not to share material with the outside world—and they know they could face criminal penalties if they do. (Daniel Ellsberg figured he might go to prison for leaking the Pentagon Papers and was willing to make the sacrifice.)

However, it’s something else entirely to go after a reporter who receives the leak. That’s what federal prosecutors are doing to James Rosen, the chief Washington correspondent for Fox News. And they’re going after him not as a witness to a crime—nor as a pressure tactic to get him to give up his source (in this case, the source has already been caught)—but rather, in the words of a Justice Department affidavit, as “an aider, an abettor, and/or a co-conspirator”: in short, as someone who might be indicted under the Espionage Act.