Fox News legal expert sees “no viable case” against James Comey

[Delldude]

Fine. Just don’t pretend like the indictment is specific. It’s not.

It's not the indictment that will be on trial.

 

[Marener]

It's not the indictment that will be on trial.

Again, that’s fine. Just don’t pretend like the indictment is specific.

 

[Delldude]

Again, that’s fine. Just don’t pretend like the indictment is specific.

It doesn't have to be.

 

[MisterBeale]

If Comey walks, our legal system isn't worth a ****.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Comey wasn't a politician.

Trump is. When does he go to jail?

 

[BackAgain]

That is count two that I posted. I posted count one earlier and it is very specific. Here it is again:

View attachment 1167302

We still don’t know what evidence was presented to the GJ (if any) to establish that Comey knew that he had indeed authorized
“person 3” to to be an anonymous source to release information known to the FBI, making his Senate testimony a lie.

 

[Leo123]

This explains why my fellow conservatives here have no answer when I ask them what James Comey lied about. Even Fox News says there’s no proof James Comey lied.

"[The indictment] seems to be premised on something that's not true, which is that [former Deputy Director Andrew] McCabe said that Comey authorized him to leak to the Wall Street Journal. If you look closely at what McCabe said, what McCabe said was that he directed a leak to The Wall Street Journal and told Comey about it after the fact," McCarthy explained.

“"So it's true that Comey never authorized it in the sense of okaying it before it happened," the legal expert expanded. "So I don't see how they can make that case."

Legal expert sees no viable case against James Comey after Trump DOJ indictment

The indictment against former FBI Director James Comey "seems to be premised on something that's not true," Fox News contributor and legal analyst Andrew McCarthy cautions.

www.foxbusiness.com

But Comey new about it and kept quiet.

 

[BackAgain]

This explains why my fellow conservatives here have no answer when I ask them what James Comey lied about. Even Fox News says there’s no proof James Comey lied.

"[The indictment] seems to be premised on something that's not true, which is that [former Deputy Director Andrew] McCabe said that Comey authorized him to leak to the Wall Street Journal. If you look closely at what McCabe said, what McCabe said was that he directed a leak to The Wall Street Journal and told Comey about it after the fact," McCarthy explained.

“"So it's true that Comey never authorized it in the sense of okaying it before it happened," the legal expert expanded. "So I don't see how they can make that case."

Legal expert sees no viable case against James Comey after Trump DOJ indictment

The indictment against former FBI Director James Comey "seems to be premised on something that's not true," Fox News contributor and legal analyst Andrew McCarthy cautions.

www.foxbusiness.com

You don’t have “fellow” conservatives since you’re a lying lib.

And Comey lied about not having authorized anyone to serve as an anonymous source for the media regarding info known to the FBI.

NOT exactly a mystery. It’s exactly what the Indictment alleges, you moron

And again, you don’t know shit about what evidence was presented before the Grand Jury.

You’re always a fraud. But you’re getting more and more obvious about it, Lib.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

And Comey lied about not having authorized anyone to serve as an anonymous source for the media regarding info known to the FBI.

That's a lie.

 

[hjmick]

This explains why my fellow conservatives here have no answer when I ask them what James Comey lied about. Even Fox News says there’s no proof James Comey lied.

"[The indictment] seems to be premised on something that's not true, which is that [former Deputy Director Andrew] McCabe said that Comey authorized him to leak to the Wall Street Journal. If you look closely at what McCabe said, what McCabe said was that he directed a leak to The Wall Street Journal and told Comey about it after the fact," McCarthy explained.

“"So it's true that Comey never authorized it in the sense of okaying it before it happened," the legal expert expanded. "So I don't see how they can make that case."

Legal expert sees no viable case against James Comey after Trump DOJ indictment

The indictment against former FBI Director James Comey "seems to be premised on something that's not true," Fox News contributor and legal analyst Andrew McCarthy cautions.

www.foxbusiness.com

In other news, Fox News contributor and legal analyst Andrew McCarthy was fired today...

 

[Delldude]

That's a lie.

That a lie.

 

[BackAgain]

That's a lie.

It’s the charge, you dope.

It can either be proved or it can’t. But it can’t possibly be a “lie” since I was only answering the imbecile OP’s false claim.

Read the indictment. It’s only two pages.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It’s the charge, you dope.

So?

It's a lie.

Trump has corrupted another lawyer.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Fine. Just don’t pretend like the indictment is specific. It’s not.

It is quite specific as to what Comey said and why it is alleged to be false.

 

[Seymour Flops]

We still don’t know what evidence was presented to the GJ (if any) to establish that Comey knew that he had indeed authorized
“person 3” to to be an anonymous source to release information known to the FBI, making his Senate testimony a lie.

Correct.

That will come out at the trial. Comey's lawyers will get that information before the trial.

 

[Leo123]

This explains why my fellow conservatives here have no answer when I ask them what James Comey lied about. Even Fox News says there’s no proof James Comey lied.

"[The indictment] seems to be premised on something that's not true, which is that [former Deputy Director Andrew] McCabe said that Comey authorized him to leak to the Wall Street Journal. If you look closely at what McCabe said, what McCabe said was that he directed a leak to The Wall Street Journal and told Comey about it after the fact," McCarthy explained.

“"So it's true that Comey never authorized it in the sense of okaying it before it happened," the legal expert expanded. "So I don't see how they can make that case."

Legal expert sees no viable case against James Comey after Trump DOJ indictment

The indictment against former FBI Director James Comey "seems to be premised on something that's not true," Fox News contributor and legal analyst Andrew McCarthy cautions.

www.foxbusiness.com

From your link, McCarthy says: "I [have known] Comey for 40 years. I like him, I was in the office with him," Fox News' Andrew McCarthy is the 'expert' you cite. Seems like he is pretty biased for Comey.

 

[BackAgain]

In other news, Fox News contributor and legal analyst Andrew McCarthy was fired today...

If that’s supposed to be funny, it failed.

No. He wasn’t fired.

And he is entitled to his opinion. But I doubt, in this matter, that he has been given access to the Grand Jury transcript or evidence.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Comey wasn't a politician.

Trump is. When does he go to jail?

I had to click the link to take all you Leftists off IGNORE and then was scrolling down and saw this piece of excreta you blathered.
1. Trials and jail are not exclusively reserved for politicians. Obviously you didn't know that or don't care. Just standing up for your fellow haters/leftists makes you feel all good inside.

2. The long list of felonies against a long list of your Leftist pals is sickening. I pray that many of them go to prison.

 

[BackAgain]

So?

It's a lie.

Trump has corrupted another lawyer.

You claim it’s a “lie.” But you don’t know that it’s a lie.

Your baseless speculation doesn’t count.

 

[BackAgain]

From your link, McCarthy says: "I [have known] Comey for 40 years. I like him, I was in the office with him," Fox News' Andrew McCarthy is the 'expert' you cite. Seems like he is pretty biased for Comey.

I happen to be a fan of McCarthy.

That doesn’t make him right.

But, at least he acknowledges things like his own personal biases.