Fox News legal expert sees “no viable case” against James Comey

[Seymour Flops]

There’s nothing specific in the indictment.

Compare it with the Flynn indictment.

https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1015126/dl

Count one is very specific. It is absurd to say otherwise.

Flynn has been talked to death, please don't try to derail Connie's thread.

 

[Ropey]

Or maybe you're not playing?

Let's take this from the other side of the logic.

It's not easy for idiots to play smart, and I've yet to see him craft anything that even alluded to intelectual responses.

As a matter of a fact, you could have a group discussion with him and then just record what he says. After a full tape, then he could just be kicked out. Now and then you could say:

"What do you think about that RW?"

Then press play for a few minutes. No need for him whatsoever.

 

[Marener]

Count one is very specific. It is absurd to say otherwise.

Flynn has been talked to death, please don't try to derail Connie's thread.

So who did Comey instruct to leak?

 

[Conservative from Georgia]

I've made my prediction:

The jury will pay close attention to the evidence and render a verdict that will be either guilty or not guilty. I further predict that I will be fine with whatever their verdict is, since they will have seen all the evidence and heard all of the arguments.

Why would you think I would predict anything else, ma'am?

You didn’t issue a prediction at all, young lady, because you know very well that the fact that the jury will issue a verdict at all is not in doubt by anyone in the world.

Dodging was still better than pretending Comey is at risk here, so your empty comment was a smart move actually.
I will give it a trophy

 

[Seymour Flops]

So who did Comey instruct to leak?

I don't know.

We'll get those details at the trial.

You didn’t issue a prediction at all, young lady, because you know very well that the fact that the jury will issue a verdict at all is not in doubt by anyone in the world.

Not at all, because the case could be dropped, Comey could cop a plea, a judge could stop the trial.

Dodging was still better than pretending Comey is at risk here, so your empty comment was a smart move actually.

I've said that if Comey is not guilty, he has nothing to worry about. I'm not the one worried.

I will give it a trophy

Thanks if you really do . . .

 

[Tommy Tainant]

This explains why my fellow conservatives here have no answer when I ask them what James Comey lied about. Even Fox News says there’s no proof James Comey lied.

"[The indictment] seems to be premised on something that's not true, which is that [former Deputy Director Andrew] McCabe said that Comey authorized him to leak to the Wall Street Journal. If you look closely at what McCabe said, what McCabe said was that he directed a leak to The Wall Street Journal and told Comey about it after the fact," McCarthy explained.

“"So it's true that Comey never authorized it in the sense of okaying it before it happened," the legal expert expanded. "So I don't see how they can make that case."

Legal expert sees no viable case against James Comey after Trump DOJ indictment

The indictment against former FBI Director James Comey "seems to be premised on something that's not true," Fox News contributor and legal analyst Andrew McCarthy cautions.

www.foxbusiness.com

He was charged a day after trump asked for it. Banana republic stuff.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If Comey walks, our legal system isn't worth a ****.

Based on what... your lizard brain, programmed dislike for Comey?

Yes, thank goodness that isn't our legal system.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I don't know.

Neither does the poor empty suit Trump has corrupted into indicting him.

Looks like you're overqualified for the prosecutors' team.

 

[Marener]

I don't know.

Because it’s not specific enough.

 

[westwall]

He was charged a day after trump asked for it. Banana republic stuff.

Months after he should have been. Deep state corruptocrats protecting their own.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Months after he should have been. Deep state corruptocrats protecting their own.

A nazi speaks.

 

[westwall]

liar.

Your speciality

 

[Seymour Flops]

Because it’s not specific enough.

It says "PERSON 3." As long as PERSON 3 is a real person, it is plenty specific, I just don't know who PERSON 3 is. I can't imagine a case without testimony from PERSON 3, so we'll find out then.

There's a little desperation coming into your arguments now. I think you'd best wait for the evidence.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Months after he should have been. Deep state corruptocrats protecting their own.

Here is where you start lining up the excuses for when it gets laughed out of court.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It says "PERSON 3." As long as PERSON 3 is a real person, it is plenty specific, I just don't know who PERSON 3 is. I can't imagine a case without testimony from PERSON 3, so we'll find out then.

There's a little desperation coming into your arguments now. I think you'd best wait for the evidence.

Typical nonsense from you.

The statement of facts is lacking. The evidence will only be presented to try to show those as true.

 

[Marener]

It says "PERSON 3." As long as PERSON 3 is a real person, it is plenty specific, I just don't know who PERSON 3 is. I can't imagine a case without testimony from PERSON 3, so we'll find out then.

There's a little desperation coming into your arguments now. I think you'd best wait for the evidence.

Yeah, it narrows it down to a few billion people right?

Not specific.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Yeah, it narrows it down to a few billion people right?

Not specific.

Of course not.

PERSON 3 will be identified at the trial.

Or if not, a conviction is very unlikely.

That would make you very happy, right?

 

[Seymour Flops]

MSNBC's Michal Cohen predicts that Comey will be found guilty:



Skip to 1:20 for Cohen to start, and/or to 3:20 to hear his prediction.

LOL!

Cohen: I believe likely he committed a crime.

MSNBC Hostess: (hushed tone) wha-at?

 

[Marener]

Of course not.

PERSON 3 will be identified at the trial.

Or if not, a conviction is very unlikely.

That would make you very happy, right?

Fine. Just don’t pretend like the indictment is specific. It’s not.

 

[Delldude]

liar.

Lol......you should watch Fox News more often.