Justice Dept. Will Appeal Dismissal of Comey and James Indictments

[Oddball]

Blondi is ******* up on purpose....

 

[otto105]

The Democrats spent countless millions of taxpayer dollars on lawfare to get Trump.

Sure, where and how.

 

[DonGlock26]

Sure, where and how.

DC, NY, and Georgia. Lawfare.

 

[otto105]

DC, NY, and Georgia. Lawfare.

I have no idea what the **** that you’re itching about.

Can you explain WTF your posting about.

 

[DonGlock26]

I have no idea what the **** that you’re itching about.

Can you explain WTF your posting about.

You've never heard of the Democrat lawfare campaign launched against Trump?

 

[otto105]

You've never heard of the Democrat lawfare campaign launched against Trump?

Hilarious

We all have seen what Shitler! did all by himself.

Stop with the idiotic bullshit ballsack licker.

 

[DonGlock26]

Hilarious

We all have seen what Shitler! did all by himself.

Stop with the idiotic bullshit ballsack licker.

Why do USMB progressives always insert homosexual sex acts into their posts?

 

[otto105]

Why do USMB progressives always insert homosexual sex acts into their posts?

Hilarious ballsacker.

 

[Concerned American]

If you lose over and over, you are or become losers. Insanity is keeping on, doing the same thing, expecting different results.

That's exactly what the democrats have been told over the nine years that they have wasted taxpayer $$$ on frivolous, vindictive, scam impeachments and lawfare. Where was your disapproval during that time, six?

 

[Concerned American]

Who? Not that he might not deserve it, but nobody thought it would happen. Found guilty? Sure. Disgraced? Sure, but pretty much disgraced anyway, as everybody knows what he did. The fat orange blob, needs to move on. Being and having been a President and wealthy may have let him get out of public trial, but it won't get those that had and presented evidence against him jailed. Team Trump is just making itself look weak and ineffective, due to somebody's emotional tantrum.

Tsk, tsk, tsk, you're not in a real good position to be whining about an emotional tantrum, six. After nine years of howling at the moon every time he sneezed, you should give it up. LMAO. Three years and a month to go! Merry Christmas!

 

[DonGlock26]

Hilarious ballsacker.

Fact: The Biden Admin met with the blue state prosecutor and Jack Smith's aides prosecuting Joe Biden's political opponent- Donald Trump.
Fact: A member of the Biden admin went to New York to take part in the prosecution of Donald Trump.

Grand juries will likely be interviewing members of the Biden DOJ regarding the conspiracy to prosecute
Joe Biden's political opponent. President Trump had a right to run for reelection free of persecution by the Biden DOJ and Democrats in Blue States conspiring with the Biden admin.

No wonder, we have been reading articles in the media that Biden DOJ lawyers are panicking over the election victory of President Trump.


See below federal law:

See below federal law:

CIVIL RIGHTS CONSPIRACY

Statutes Enforced by the Criminal Section​

www.justice.gov

House panel wants records on Jack Smith deputy’s White House visits before Trump charges
August 29, 2023
In The News
Steven Nelson

New York Post
WASHINGTON — The House Judiciary Committee demanded Tuesday that the Biden administration explain why a prosecutor working for special counsel Jack Smith visited the West Wing before former President Donald Trump’s indictment for allegedly mishandling classified national security records.

Committee chairman Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) wrote Attorney General Merrick Garland and White House chief of staff Jeff Zients requesting all relevant documents on attorney Jay Bratt’s three known meetings at the executive mansion, which were first reported Saturday by The Post.

“According to recent reporting, Jay Bratt—a Department of Justice employee and top aide to Special Counsel Jack Smith—met with White House officials multiple times, just weeks before Mr. Smith indicted former President Donald Trump,” Jordan wrote.

“This new information raises serious concerns regarding the potential for a coordinated effort between the Department and the White House to investigate and prosecute President Biden’s political opponents.”

House panel wants records on Jack Smith deputy’s White House visits before Trump charges​

WASHINGTON — The House Judiciary Committee demanded Tuesday that the Biden administration explain why a prosecutor working for special counsel Jack Smith visited the West Wing before former President Donald Trump’s indictment for allegedly mishandling classifi

judiciary.house.gov
Click to expand...

Trump Seeks Details of Atlanta Prosecutor’s Communications with Biden Aides​

Nathan Wade talked to White House staff members in 2022, when he was seeking witnesses for the investigation into whether Donald J. Trump interfered in the 2020 election in Georgia.

Trump Seeks Details of Atlanta Prosecutor’s Communications with Biden Aides (Published 2024)​

Nathan Wade talked to White House staff members in 2022, when he was seeking witnesses for the investigation into whether Donald J. Trump interfered in the 2020 election in Georgia.

www.nytimes.com
Click to expand...

Chairman Jordan Demands Documents about Bragg Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo from Letitia James

May 15, 2024
Press Release

Matthew Colangelo, a former senior Biden Justice Department official, is a lead attorney in the political prosecution of President Trump with Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg
WASHINGTON, D.C. – House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) sent a letter to New York Attorney General Letitia James demanding documents about New York County District Attorney (DANY) Alvin Bragg's lead prosecutor Matthew Colangelo as the Committee continues its investigation into politicized prosecutions.

Given the perception that the Biden DOJ is assisting in District Attorney Bragg's prosecution, Chairman Jordan has requested communications and documents related to Colangelo's previous employment at the New York Attorney General's Office, where he worked several anti-Trump investigations. The fact that a former senior Biden DOJ official—whose previous employment consisted of leading "a wave of state litigation against Trump administration policies"—is now leading the prosecution of President Biden's chief political rival only adds to the perception that the Biden DOJ is politicized and weaponized.

Yesterday, May 15, 2024, at 10:00 am ET the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government held a hearing to examine the weaponization of the rule of law.

Chairman Jordan Demands Documents about Bragg Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo from Letitia James​

WASHINGTON, D.C. – House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) sent a letter to New York Attorney General Letitia James demanding documents about New York County District Attorney (DANY

judiciary.house.gov
Click to expand...

District Attorney Bragg Announces Matthew Colangelo as New Senior Counsel​

December 5, 2022
Former Acting Associate Attorney General for the U.S. Department of Justice will Support Office’s Housing & Tenant Protection, Labor & Worker Protection, and White-Collar Investigations

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., today announced the appointment of Matthew Colangelo as new Senior Counsel to the District Attorney. Colangelo, who most recently served as a senior official at the U.S. Department of Justice, will focus on the Office’s cases, policies, and strategies in housing and tenant protection and labor and worker protection, as well as the Office’s most sensitive and high-profile white-collar investigations.

District Attorney Bragg Announces Matthew Colangelo as New Senior Counsel​

“Public safety requires economic stability, and all New Yorkers deserve to live and work without risk of harassment, wage theft, or dangerous workplaces,” said District Attorney Bragg. “Matthew Colangelo brings a wealth of economic justice experience combined with complex white-collar investigations

manhattanda.org
Click to expand...

Manhattan DA hires former DOJ official who previously investigated Trump Foundation
Matthew Colangelo served in the DOJ and the New York attorney general's office.

Manhattan DA hires former DOJ official who previously investigated Trump Foundation​

Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg announced that his office has hired ex-DOJ official Matthew Colangelo, who previously investigated former President Trump's charity foundation.

abcnews.go.com
Click to expand...

I

 

[otto105]

See below federal law:





















I

And you so-called evidence is what ballsacker?

Didn’t Shitler! call the GA Secretary of State and ask him to find votes.

 

[White 6]

That's exactly what the democrats have been told over the nine years that they have wasted taxpayer $$$ on frivolous, vindictive, scam impeachments and lawfare. Where was your disapproval during that time, six?

Working for a living, to rebuild assets lost in the Bush crash, and then after Nov 2019 commenting on the Anti-American trump 1.0 and now the 2.0 fascist period.

 

[DonGlock26]

And you so-called evidence is what ballsacker?

Didn’t Shitler! call the GA Secretary of State and ask him to find votes.

 

[otto105]

Whose crazy maga fuckup

 

[DonGlock26]

Whose crazy maga fuckup

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"Justice Dept. Will Appeal Dismissal of Comey and James Indictments


The Trump administration had vowed to fight a judge’s decision to dismiss unrelated criminal charges against James Comey, the former F.B.I. director, and Letitia James, the attorney general of New York.



The Justice Department said on Friday that it would appeal the dismissals of its criminal cases against James B. Comey, the former F.B.I. director, and Attorney General Letitia James of New York, two frequent targets of President Trump.

The move could provide the department with a path to revive charges against Mr. Comey and Ms. James after the courts threw up a number of roadblocks to the administration’s bid to bring new indictments against them. It came weeks after Attorney General Pam Bondi pledged to do so.

Any appeal would be handled by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which sits in Richmond, Va. Because the cases raise questions about the boundaries between presidential power and congressional authority, they could ultimately go to the Supreme Court."

https://archive.is/96FNM#selection-683.0-691.253

Let's go. The progressive federal judicial resistance doesn't do very well at the appellate level.

I think the correct phrase is "premeditated incompetence".

If anyone was going to be held accountable it would have already happened

 

[DonGlock26]

I think the correct phrase is "premeditated incompetence".

If anyone was going to be held accountable it would have already happened

They are appealing.

 

[otto105]

 

[forkup]

"Justice Dept. Will Appeal Dismissal of Comey and James Indictments


The Trump administration had vowed to fight a judge’s decision to dismiss unrelated criminal charges against James Comey, the former F.B.I. director, and Letitia James, the attorney general of New York.



The Justice Department said on Friday that it would appeal the dismissals of its criminal cases against James B. Comey, the former F.B.I. director, and Attorney General Letitia James of New York, two frequent targets of President Trump.

The move could provide the department with a path to revive charges against Mr. Comey and Ms. James after the courts threw up a number of roadblocks to the administration’s bid to bring new indictments against them. It came weeks after Attorney General Pam Bondi pledged to do so.

Any appeal would be handled by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, which sits in Richmond, Va. Because the cases raise questions about the boundaries between presidential power and congressional authority, they could ultimately go to the Supreme Court."

https://archive.is/96FNM#selection-683.0-691.253

Let's go. The progressive federal judicial resistance doesn't do very well at the appellate level.

It seems this particular issue has done perfectly fine

https://www.reuters.com/world/us-appeals-court-disqualifies-trump-ally-habba-us-attorney-2025-12-01/

So what legal rationale do you think this appellate court will decide on that they didn't in New Yersey