Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's true for company trucks but not so much for owner operators. Repair costs on lease trucks don't come out of the company's pocket.Several trucking companies won't let you be an O/O of a big rig if your truck is too old. Why? Because their name is on that freight and they need it delivered on time, every time. An old truck constantly breaking down and such is a drag on the companies bottom line.
Its intentional.Democrats have the amazing ability to literally fuck up everything they touch.
It is like their super power.
That's true for company trucks but not so much for owner operators. Repair costs on lease trucks don't come out of the company's pocket.
Wait...so California truck regs are causing delays in GEORGIA?Upgrading infrastructure should include mass storage and mass transit.
Late deliveries don't hurt revenue generation too terribly bad.I never said they did, did you read what I wrote? I said an old O/O truck breaking down hurts their bottom line. I didn't say they had to repair the truck. It hurts their bottom line because the freight is delivered late and that hurts the company.
So you agree that the law is senseless and should be repealed.Every major trucking company has similar or stricter requirements for trucks they own or lease. Down time and insurance cost makes older trucks too expensive to run. Almost all refineries and plants have similar requirements for trucks hauling to or from their facilities.
Nothing I wrote could be construed by a sane person as me wanting to repeal that law. What is wrong with you?So you agree that the law is senseless and should be repealed.
Just imagine if California had spent those hundreds of billions of dollars on expanding their freight and rail system rather on a senseless highspeed rail system?Upgrading infrastructure should include mass storage and mass transit.
That should have happened concurrently, regardless.Just imagine if California had spent those hundreds of billions of dollars on expanding their freight and rail system rather on a senseless highspeed rail system?
Say wut??Late deliveries don't hurt revenue generation too terribly bad.
Why? Highspeed rail is useless and nothing but a boondoggle.That should have happened concurrently, regardless.
Being the Commander in Chief is a far cry from TAKING responsibility.Not sure what you are talking about. He is the commander in chief of the entire military.
In that case the Secretary is redundant, dead weight.Shouldn't be anything an assistant secretary would not be able to handle.
Are you relieved, as I am, that all of the experts in viral diseases, electoral laws, voters rights legislation are now tackling supply chain logistics?I did repeated searches relating to semi-truck shortage in California. Could not find it, except for PJ Media, which is high traffic, low credibility site, so I don't buy it as a cause of the current problem getting containers off the docks and on the highway. Though, it might be, in the future.
I used to drive a truck, with license back to the Special Chauffeurs license predating the modern CDL, which I also held, as a hedge against driver shortage, where I managed transportation and logistics.
I wouldn't be too quick to put 18-year-olds behind to wheel of a big rig, if I were you. They generally lack self-discipline, attention to detail, and good judgement, as that is how they are wired at that age. They also make up the group most often involved in deadly motor vehicle accidents.
If you're housebound I guess...Why? Highspeed rail is useless and nothing but a boondoggle.
As long as the load gets delivered, the company still gets paid.Say wut??
You seem to have forgotten to include your reliable source and working links. Would you include them for us please?Trump caused the trucker shortage. Trump admin regulations in 2017 forcing 35% of truckers out of service for sleep apnea!