Recognizing that rebellion against one's country and one's oaths is not honorable is reverting to history, not changing, altering or revising it.
THAT is revisionist history.
The oath to the constitution that our politicians and elected officials are sworn to uphold maintains they will not operate against the tenets of the constitution.
Which of course the Union did when they sought to control and steal from the south...and which is what the feds today are doing when they seek to control and steal from the remaining residents of rural areas in the west.
And when they violate the oath, and when the government oppresses and harms the people in violation of the constitution, then we absolutely are obliged to raise up against them.
Psst...seeking to oust tyrants and criminals from seats of powers isn't the same as "rebellion against one's country"...any more than "public lands" and "federally owned lands" are the same thing.