Firefighters Professional Trade Journal Concludes 9/11 Was "Explosive Demolition"

[Toddsterpatriot]

I say again Toddster--these events were examined by citizen investigators 20+ years ago. Citizen investigators had to do all the work because POTUS decided a government investigation was not needed because he and others already knew all the answers.

So I've been aware of those facts for 20+ years. I did not just discover them yesterday. You have no obligation to believe what few points I've made here. My guess is that you will continue to believe as you've been told by your government because that's just the way you are.

Which citizen investigator discovered a nuke was used?
You made a lot of points and provided zero evidence.
I didn't need the government to point out your lack of evidence.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The identities were real, though in many ways suspicious regarding the passengers, but the crew members were real. They just were not in those airplanes that struck the towers.

More importantly Todd, you cannot prove the official narrative. Nobody can. They use an appeal to authority, and of course appeals to emotion, but nobody including you can prove a single element of the official narrative.

You can prove no real crew or real passengers died?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Watch the OPs documentary.

The owner of WTC 7, Larry Silverstein, made a statement at a conference in Isreal, that he was already designing a new building for that location. . . IN 1999. . or it might have been 2000, either way, it was at least a year before the attack.


I had never seen that footage, very, very interesting.

.

I thought the BBC's Jane Standley announcing the collapse of WTC 7 before it happened was fairly telling.

 

[MisterBeale]

.

I thought the BBC's Jane Standley announcing the collapse of WTC 7 before it happened was fairly telling.

Agreed.

Most folks know about that one, b/c the CNN announcement has been memory holed. I'm pretty sure they announced it would collapse first.

Even though, never in history, or since, has this type of building collapsed due to just office fires. There is no way they could have known this information unless the folks that were responsible for the collapse had told the media it was coming down.


See posts #185 and #186.

Better yet, if this topic interests you, I highly recommend you watch the documentary in the OP, & Tucker's interview of Curt Weldon, post #163.

I thought I had known everything about this false flag, but no, there is new information in this thread.

 

[MisterBeale]

You made a lot of points and provided zero evidence.

Much like all the posts you have made in this thread.


. . . and really? What would it matter?


You ignore great evidence in the OP, and throughout this thread.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Much like all the posts you have made in this thread.


. . . and really? What would it matter?


You ignore great evidence in the OP, and throughout this thread.

There is no evidence in the OP dumbass

Nor any evidence throughout the thread of a cover up or inside job or any of the other crap you spew

EVERY claim you have made has been DISPROVEN. Not debunked or refuted but DISPROVEN

Now post a meme cause all twoofer claims are memes

 

[MisterBeale]

There is no evidence in the OP dumbass

Nor any evidence throughout the thread of a cover up or inside job or any of the other crap you spew

EVERY claim you have made has been DISPROVEN. Not debunked or refuted but DISPROVEN

Now post a meme cause all twoofer claims are memes

 

[Soupnazi630]

Like I told you to do

very good

There is still no evidence anywhere iin the op

Go ahead and cite some evidence

 

[ranfunck]

Like I told you to do

very good

There is still no evidence anywhere iin the op

Go ahead and cite some evidence

The evidence has been posted, but you refuse to look at it or accept it.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The evidence has been posted, but you refuse to look at it or accept it.

No it has not

False claims have been posted not evidence

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

.

I thought the BBC's Jane Standley announcing the collapse of WTC 7 before it happened was fairly telling.

Fairly telling of what?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Much like all the posts you have made in this thread.


. . . and really? What would it matter?


You ignore great evidence in the OP, and throughout this thread.

There was evidence that it was an explosive demolition? Where?
Post it again if you can find it.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Fairly telling of what?

.

The fact that they knew it was going to happen before it happened.

Not too organic.



.

 

[Soupnazi630]

.

The fact that they knew it was going to happen before it happened.

Not too organic.



.

No one did

once again zero fucking evidence from you retarded twoofers

 

[ranfunck]

No it has not

False claims have been posted not evidence

I understand this is your job, but this just makes you look stupid.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

.

The fact that they knew it was going to happen before it happened.

Not too organic.



.

They knew it was going to collapse, that's why they pulled all the firefighters out.

Now how did they know it was going to collapse?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

They knew it was going to collapse, that's why they pulled all the firefighters out.

Now how did they know it was going to collapse?

The structural engineers on the ground made that determination.

Neither you nor I could, for sure.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The structural engineers on the ground made that determination.

Neither you nor I could, for sure.

Right, it was leaning and the lean continued to worsen.
And it burned, uncontrolled, for hours.
It was only a matter of time.
That's why the BBC knew, because everyone was saying, "It's going to collapse", not because it was a secret, mistakenly leaked early to the BBC.

 

[MisterBeale]

The structural engineers on the ground made that determination.

I have never heard this.

What were their names, and who did they work for.

Link?

 

[MisterBeale]

Right, it was leaning and the lean continued to worsen.
And it burned, uncontrolled, for hours.
It was only a matter of time.

False. If it were leaning, it would not have collapsed into its own footprint.

. . . and fire from office furniture has never caused a collapse before or since. Are you really this dumb?