Firefighters Professional Trade Journal Concludes 9/11 Was "Explosive Demolition"

[PeterPilot]

MisterBeale

Do you mean to say there is no evidence that planes were hijacked and no evidence they were not hijacked? If that's what you are saying, you have a contradiction in terms. It cannot be both ways. Either they were hijacked or they were not.

There is a government narrative that they were hijacked, but no evidence to prove that claim.

 

[PeterPilot]

Do you have this footage? Can you post it please.

No I don't have it. It happened 23 years ago. The story is also covered by Christopher Bollyn in his books about 911. Bollyn interviewed Wally Miller about 10 years later on another matter, and it was at that time that Miller told him how the FBI leaned on him to "be a team player".

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No I don't have it. It happened 23 years ago. The story is also covered by Christopher Bollyn in his books about 911. Bollyn interviewed Wally Miller about 10 years later on another matter, and it was at that time that Miller told him how the FBI leaned on him to "be a team player".

You have no evidence that the dead passengers and crew were all faked?

Weird.

 

[Soupnazi630]

MisterBeale

Do you mean to say there is no evidence that planes were hijacked and no evidence they were not hijacked? If that's what you are saying, you have a contradiction in terms. It cannot be both ways. Either they were hijacked or they were not.

There is a government narrative that they were hijacked, but no evidence to prove that claim.

Wrong there is in fact overwhelming evidence they were hijacked.

It is you and all other twoofers with no evidence

 

[ranfunck]

Wrong there is in fact overwhelming evidence they were hijacked.

It is you and all other twoofers with no evidence

Paid to post

 

[Soupnazi630]

Paid to post

No one is

 

[MisterBeale]

MisterBeale

Do you mean to say there is no evidence that planes were hijacked and no evidence they were not hijacked? If that's what you are saying, you have a contradiction in terms. It cannot be both ways. Either they were hijacked or they were not.

There is a government narrative that they were hijacked, but no evidence to prove that claim.

The only evidence that exists that there were hijackers on those planes is entirely circumstantial.

Passports that somehow survived when nothing else did. . . and I have seen some video of some of the "terrorists," at the airport before the planes took off.

. . . of course, that doesn't prove anything. Especially when we find out that two. . or was it three? . . .of those "terrorists" were CIA confidential informants. SO yeah, it does take a bit to swallow that they were actually on those planes.

But? We don't have any proof that they weren't. It is an article of faith for some. I had heard some rumors, a few years after 9/11 that some of the so-called "terrorists," were spotted somewhere. I dunno if that account is accurate and true though.

Others know that there is some likelihood that at least some of those terrorists were on the planes, and more than likely were told to take control of them. Anyone that is familiar with how the establishment can create mass shooters, and "lone-nut-assassins," knows, this is not out of the realm of possibility.


I don't, however, believe they knew how to fly well enough to accomplish the type of flying that would be required to nail the Pentagon of course, probably not even the towers either. This is well known, Pilots for Truth have dispensed with the radical Islamists learning to fly silly narrative.

More than likely, once the planes were rested from the airline pilots, the deep state used drone technology before it was well known.

The plane that was spotted in restricted airspace above the White House that day? That more than likely was the platform from which they controlled the "hijacked planes." Very few folks knew about that plane, even people that are keen on researching this tragedy. It is on the cover of one of Peter Dale Scott's book. He's a well regarded tenured professor from Berkley. If this topic interests you, I suggest you read that.

9-11/E-4B - Wikispooks

wikispooks.com

9/11: Fifth mystery plane above White House 'was £170m US Air Force doomsday jet'

THE US military deployed a top-secret doomsday plane to protect President George W Bush during the 9/11 attacks, according to claims online.

www.dailystar.co.uk

. . . this is just my personal conjecture. No one really knows, and after the scamdemic, everyone should be clear about trusting the government's word on anything.

False Flags: The Secret History of Al Qaeda; Can you admit when you have been conned?​

Thread 'False Flags: The Secret History of Al Qaeda; Can you admit when you have been conned?'

Sep 24, 2022

The week-end is a nice time to watch a documentary, and maybe take a new look on an old paradigm.

Episode 407 - False Flags: The Secret History of Al Qaeda — Part 1 (video)​

Corbett • 09/13/2021

Episode 407 – False Flags: The Secret History of Al Qaeda — Part 1 (video) | The Corbett Report

www.corbettreport.com

We all know the story of bin Laden and Al Qaeda, the story that was repeated ad nauseam in the days, weeks and months after the catastrophic, catalyzing events of 9/11. So often was that story repeated that the hypnotized public forgot that...

• MisterBeale

• 
• 

 

[MisterBeale]

Paid to post

I'll like gipper 's hypothesis on why SoupNazi posts the drivel he does.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

 

[Soupnazi630]

The only evidence that exists that there were hijackers on those planes is entirely circumstantial.

Passports that somehow survived when nothing else did. . . and I have seen some video of some of the "terrorists," at the airport before the planes took off.

. . . of course, that doesn't prove anything. Especially when we find out that two. . or was it three? . . .of those "terrorists" were CIA confidential informants. SO yeah, it does take a bit to swallow that they were actually on those planes.

But? We don't have any proof that they weren't. It is an article of faith for some. I had heard some rumors, a few years after 9/11 that some of the so-called "terrorists," were spotted somewhere. I dunno if that account is accurate and true though.

Others know that there is some likelihood that at least some of those terrorists were on the planes, and more than likely were told to take control of them. Anyone that is familiar with how the establishment can create mass shooters, and "lone-nut-assassins," knows, this is not out of the realm of possibility.


I don't, however, believe they knew how to fly well enough to accomplish the type of flying that would be required to nail the Pentagon of course, probably not even the towers either. This is well known, Pilots for Truth have dispensed with the radical Islamists learning to fly silly narrative.

More than likely, once the planes were rested from the airline pilots, the deep state used drone technology before it was well known.

The plane that was spotted in restricted airspace above the White House that day? That more than likely was the platform from which they controlled the "hijacked planes." Very few folks knew about that plane, even people that are keen on researching this tragedy. It is on the cover of one of Peter Dale Scott's book. He's a well regarded tenured professor from Berkley. If this topic interests you, I suggest you read that.

9-11/E-4B - Wikispooks

wikispooks.com

9/11: Fifth mystery plane above White House 'was £170m US Air Force doomsday jet'

THE US military deployed a top-secret doomsday plane to protect President George W Bush during the 9/11 attacks, according to claims online.

www.dailystar.co.uk

. . . this is just my personal conjecture. No one really knows, and after the scamdemic, everyone should be clear about trusting the government's word on anything.

False Flags: The Secret History of Al Qaeda; Can you admit when you have been conned?​

Thread 'False Flags: The Secret History of Al Qaeda; Can you admit when you have been conned?'

Sep 24, 2022

The week-end is a nice time to watch a documentary, and maybe take a new look on an old paradigm.

Episode 407 - False Flags: The Secret History of Al Qaeda — Part 1 (video)​

Corbett • 09/13/2021

Episode 407 – False Flags: The Secret History of Al Qaeda — Part 1 (video) | The Corbett Report

www.corbettreport.com

We all know the story of bin Laden and Al Qaeda, the story that was repeated ad nauseam in the days, weeks and months after the catastrophic, catalyzing events of 9/11. So often was that story repeated that the hypnotized public forgot that...

• MisterBeale

• 
• 

Wrong it is conclusive evidence not circumstantial

witnesses who called from the planes for one thing.

There was only one such passport not passports

there was no such revelatiuon that any of them were CIA informants

Hitting the pentagon was easy it did not require fancy flying, any novice can do it. No pilots refute that fact'

'Stick to FACTS.

you are making shit up

 

[gipper]

Wrong it is conclusive evidence not circumstantial

witnesses who called from the planes for one thing.

There was only one such passport not passports

there was no such revelatiuon that any of them were CIA informants

Hitting the pentagon was easy it did not require fancy flying, any novice can do it. No pilots refute that fact'

'Stick to FACTS.

you are making shit up

Yeah sure thing Allan, and Oswald acted alone and never had any involvement with your grandpa’s CIA.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yeah sure thing Allan, and Oswald acted alone and never had any involvement with your grandpa’s CIA.

yes that is proven

You have never posted evidence to the contrary

That is FACT liar

 

[MisterBeale]

Wrong it is conclusive evidence not circumstantial

witnesses who called from the planes for one thing.

There was only one such passport not passports

there was no such revelatiuon that any of them were CIA informants

Hitting the pentagon was easy it did not require fancy flying, any novice can do it. No pilots refute that fact'

'Stick to FACTS.

you are making shit up

 

[gipper]

yes that is proven

You have never posted evidence to the contrary

That is FACT liar

Yes it’s proven Oswald was involved with the CIA. Your godfather Angelton was running him, but you already knew this.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Yes it’s proven Oswald was involved with the CIA. Your godfather Angelton was running him, but you already knew this.

No it is not.

It is only proven they and angelton were AWARE of him which is not the same thing you stupid motherfucker

As always you are a liar with no fucking evidence

 

[PeterPilot]

Close examination of ATC ground control records at Boston where the first 2 aircraft departed showed that 2 different aircraft using the call sign United 175 called in about 20 minutes apart.

Wow! Sounds serious!
Please post those records so I can closely examine them.

Yes, drones were the aircraft that hit the towers, not AA11 or UA175.

So, all the passengers and crew were fabricated? Can you prove that?

The country coroner in Shanksville clearly stated in his filmed interview after examining the field that there was nothing resembling an airliner in that field.

How many airliner crashes has he examined before? Since?
What should one look like after crashing into the ground at 400 mph plus?
Shredded aluminum?

No engines, no landing gear, no baggage and no human bodies.

Parts of engines, landing gear, seats, baggage and bodies were recovered.

I say again Toddster--these events were examined by citizen investigators 20+ years ago. Citizen investigators had to do all the work because POTUS decided a government investigation was not needed because he and others already knew all the answers.

So I've been aware of those facts for 20+ years. I did not just discover them yesterday. You have no obligation to believe what few points I've made here. My guess is that you will continue to believe as you've been told by your government because that's just the way you are.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

I once asked a conspiracy theorist where would they hide that much explosives. He didn't have an answer and the conversation ended on that note.

.


So your friend was an explosives expert.



.

 

[PeterPilot]

You have no evidence that the dead passengers and crew were all faked?

Weird.

The identities were real, though in many ways suspicious regarding the passengers, but the crew members were real. They just were not in those airplanes that struck the towers.

More importantly Todd, you cannot prove the official narrative. Nobody can. They use an appeal to authority, and of course appeals to emotion, but nobody including you can prove a single element of the official narrative.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

nobody including you can prove a single element

.

Bottom line.


.

 

[Donald H]

Watch the OPs documentary.

The owner of WTC 7, Larry Silverstein, made a statement at a conference in Isreal, that he was already designing a new building for that location. . . IN 1999. . or it might have been 2000, either way, it was at least a year before the attack.


I had never seen that footage, very, very interesting.

Silversteing must have staged a full dress rehearsal of building 7 coming down. Maybe during the dark of night on September 10?