Finish it the hell up - Gowdy speaks out

[Faun]

Its time to end it...Mueller needs to stand before the American people and tell us what he has.....not next month or next week....NOW!!!!!

How long was Benghazi?

This isn't a game of gotcha Coyote....we are investigating the leader of the free world....it involves all of us one way or the other....men died in Benghazi and we needed to know why and how...if Hillary and Obama had been as forth coming as Trump has been her investigation would have been short and informative but her and Obama fought every step of the way.... Blame her for the length of time...

We knew why after the first Benghazi investigation. Why did 7 more follow?

 

[iceberg]

one of the MAJOR differences here is that they were after hillary for a specific reason.

the left is after trumps camp for anything they can find as long as they keep digging. OF WHICH many have said trump isn't even the target of said investigation. so investigating trump WHO IS NOT UNDER INVESTIGATION by claiming victory by getting people to try and get to trump is a phyric victory at best.

but have at it i suppose. this only means this will become our politics now. identify, hate, and investigate whatever we feel like investigating.

 

[toobfreak]

pretty telling overall. 60 people vote to impeach w/o hearing evidence. reflection of our society today - give me what i want in lynch mob fashion, laws be damned cause i hate you.

Pretty much a reflection of this board. Every day I hear outrageous charges and accusations against Trump but when you ask them for the proof to support those claims, they run scared and disappear. The Left is caught between total denial and total delusion.

 

[Care4all]

So, how many recent white candidates were treated like this?

How many of them had a book jacket that said they were born in Kenya?

Not even Obama had that. What the **** are you talking about?

This is why they questioned his birthplace.

Barack Obama was still 'Kenyan born' in 2007 according to his literary agency...two months after announcing his bid for the U.S presidency | Daily Mail Online

Nothing in your link says anything about his book jacket stating he was born in Kenya.

So again, I ask.... what the **** are you talking about?

It was on his 1991 bio.

It was on a pamphlet, sent only to editors within the publishing company, for Obama and other new authors, so the editors of the company could get some knowledge of who their new, up and coming authors were...

it was never produced to distribute outside of the company, it was only for insiders....

plus the INTERN that had the duty of pulling these new author bios together for their staff, ADMITS to making the MISTAKE.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

This is why they questioned his birthplace.

Barack Obama was still 'Kenyan born' in 2007 according to his literary agency...two months after announcing his bid for the U.S presidency | Daily Mail Online

Nothing in your link says anything about his book jacket stating he was born in Kenya.

So again, I ask.... what the **** are you talking about?

It was on his 1991 bio.

You said it was on his book jacket.

Now we get to the point of your posts.
Semantics.Wow didnt see that coming......

LOL

What you call "semantics" is actually a lame dismissal by you after being exposed as not knowing what the **** you're talking about.

Now that we've clarified that, can you discern the difference between a book jacket, which appears in the public on millions of copies of books and represents the account of the author of the book(Obama) -- with a promotional pamphlet that was privately sent to a few thousand people on a literary agent's mailing list and represents the account of the author of the pamphlet (Acton & Dystel)?

And you didn't answer the question .... there were several news articles written around the time of that pamphlet stating Obama was born in Hawaii .... why would anyone ignore the news but accept a virtually unknown literary pamphlet?

There is plenty of info out there that brings barry's birthplace into question.

There have been no instances where a "white" potential president had any doubt cast on their birthplace for obvious reasons.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

How many of them had a book jacket that said they were born in Kenya?

Not even Obama had that. What the **** are you talking about?

This is why they questioned his birthplace.

Barack Obama was still 'Kenyan born' in 2007 according to his literary agency...two months after announcing his bid for the U.S presidency | Daily Mail Online

Nothing in your link says anything about his book jacket stating he was born in Kenya.

So again, I ask.... what the **** are you talking about?

It was on his 1991 bio.

It was on a pamphlet, sent only to editors within the publishing company, for Obama and other new authors, so the editors of the company could get some knowledge of who their new, up and coming authors were...

it was never produced to distribute outside of the company, it was only for insiders....

plus the INTERN that had the duty of pulling these new author bios together for their staff, ADMITS to making the MISTAKE.

But where did they get the idea he was born in Kenya?
And that birth certificate is sketchy as hell.

 

[iceberg]

How many of them had a book jacket that said they were born in Kenya?

Not even Obama had that. What the **** are you talking about?

This is why they questioned his birthplace.

Barack Obama was still 'Kenyan born' in 2007 according to his literary agency...two months after announcing his bid for the U.S presidency | Daily Mail Online

Nothing in your link says anything about his book jacket stating he was born in Kenya.

So again, I ask.... what the **** are you talking about?

It was on his 1991 bio.

It was on a pamphlet, sent only to editors within the publishing company, for Obama and other new authors, so the editors of the company could get some knowledge of who their new, up and coming authors were...

it was never produced to distribute outside of the company, it was only for insiders....

plus the INTERN that had the duty of pulling these new author bios together for their staff, ADMITS to making the MISTAKE.

not trying to stir a pot cause obama's time is over - not like this would really matter much at this point except fuel hate already in high gear - but an intern can't make that mistake on their own. it would take an intern and their editor and it would be hard to believe obama would not pre-read a book about himself very carefully. it's just his nature. could still have happened, but you're talking 3+ people making the same mistake at this point, i would think.

 

[Nosmo King]

lmao

How long did Gowdy spend on the Benghazi investigation?

It last SEVENTEEN MONTHS. He is a ******* hypocrite. While Benghazi was horrible, the Russia investigation is by far more important.

if nothing has been found in 17 months, it won't be. we need to stop this damn division and end this "payback" mentality you're advocating here now.

we all need to stop this bullshit that people must be investigated until they wind up in jail cause that's the only outcome you will sleep better at night with.

Two and a half years. That's how long Gowdy's Great Benghazi Adventure lasted. Withno indictments, no convictions, no guilty pleas and no prison time served. Two and a half years lasting until just after the 2016 elections when he announced 'nothing to see here!'

Meanwhile, the Mueller investigation has gone on for 13 months with lots of indictments, guilty pleas, charges filed and, in some cases already, jail time served.

Whitewater was on for longer. Watergate was on for longer.

It's clear that Trump's political allies want this to end, but justice does not start and stop on the urging of political allies.

it's clear people want this to end.

name 1 "conviction" that is actually tied to RUSSIA and the core reason for the "investigation"

That's the standard? The standard isn't let the investigation run its course? How much evidence did Cohen provide? Is it fair to understand all that means? Federal prosecutors run an investigation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

Name one conviction that actually tied Sec. Clinton to a crime in Benghazi. And that lasted two and a half years.

 

[iceberg]

lmao

How long did Gowdy spend on the Benghazi investigation?

It last SEVENTEEN MONTHS. He is a ******* hypocrite. While Benghazi was horrible, the Russia investigation is by far more important.

if nothing has been found in 17 months, it won't be. we need to stop this damn division and end this "payback" mentality you're advocating here now.

we all need to stop this bullshit that people must be investigated until they wind up in jail cause that's the only outcome you will sleep better at night with.

Two and a half years. That's how long Gowdy's Great Benghazi Adventure lasted. Withno indictments, no convictions, no guilty pleas and no prison time served. Two and a half years lasting until just after the 2016 elections when he announced 'nothing to see here!'

Meanwhile, the Mueller investigation has gone on for 13 months with lots of indictments, guilty pleas, charges filed and, in some cases already, jail time served.

Whitewater was on for longer. Watergate was on for longer.

It's clear that Trump's political allies want this to end, but justice does not start and stop on the urging of political allies.

it's clear people want this to end.

name 1 "conviction" that is actually tied to RUSSIA and the core reason for the "investigation"

That's the standard? The standard isn't let the investigation run its course? How much evidence did Cohen provide? Is it fair to understand all that means? Federal prosecutors run an investigation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

Name one conviction that actually tied Sec. Clinton to a crime in Benghazi. And that lasted two and a half years.

they weren't shotgunning it go after everyone and anyone that they could as far as i know. they were after hillary.

the left again is just after whatever they can get. just stop pretending this is anything other than petty revenge politics.

 

[Nosmo King]

lmao

How long did Gowdy spend on the Benghazi investigation?

It last SEVENTEEN MONTHS. He is a ******* hypocrite. While Benghazi was horrible, the Russia investigation is by far more important.

if nothing has been found in 17 months, it won't be. we need to stop this damn division and end this "payback" mentality you're advocating here now.

we all need to stop this bullshit that people must be investigated until they wind up in jail cause that's the only outcome you will sleep better at night with.

Two and a half years. That's how long Gowdy's Great Benghazi Adventure lasted. Withno indictments, no convictions, no guilty pleas and no prison time served. Two and a half years lasting until just after the 2016 elections when he announced 'nothing to see here!'

Meanwhile, the Mueller investigation has gone on for 13 months with lots of indictments, guilty pleas, charges filed and, in some cases already, jail time served.

Whitewater was on for longer. Watergate was on for longer.

It's clear that Trump's political allies want this to end, but justice does not start and stop on the urging of political allies.

it's clear people want this to end.

name 1 "conviction" that is actually tied to RUSSIA and the core reason for the "investigation"

That's the standard? The standard isn't let the investigation run its course? How much evidence did Cohen provide? Is it fair to understand all that means? Federal prosecutors run an investigation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

Name one conviction that actually tied Sec. Clinton to a crime in Benghazi. And that lasted two and a half years.

they weren't shotgunning it go after everyone and anyone that they could as far as i know. they were after hillary.

the left again is just after whatever they can get. just stop pretending this is anything other than petty revenge politics.

Gee! I wonder how an Arkansas real estate deal lead to a semen stained dress?

 

[iceberg]

if nothing has been found in 17 months, it won't be. we need to stop this damn division and end this "payback" mentality you're advocating here now.

we all need to stop this bullshit that people must be investigated until they wind up in jail cause that's the only outcome you will sleep better at night with.

Two and a half years. That's how long Gowdy's Great Benghazi Adventure lasted. Withno indictments, no convictions, no guilty pleas and no prison time served. Two and a half years lasting until just after the 2016 elections when he announced 'nothing to see here!'

Meanwhile, the Mueller investigation has gone on for 13 months with lots of indictments, guilty pleas, charges filed and, in some cases already, jail time served.

Whitewater was on for longer. Watergate was on for longer.

It's clear that Trump's political allies want this to end, but justice does not start and stop on the urging of political allies.

it's clear people want this to end.

name 1 "conviction" that is actually tied to RUSSIA and the core reason for the "investigation"

That's the standard? The standard isn't let the investigation run its course? How much evidence did Cohen provide? Is it fair to understand all that means? Federal prosecutors run an investigation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

Name one conviction that actually tied Sec. Clinton to a crime in Benghazi. And that lasted two and a half years.

they weren't shotgunning it go after everyone and anyone that they could as far as i know. they were after hillary.

the left again is just after whatever they can get. just stop pretending this is anything other than petty revenge politics.

Gee! I wonder how an Arkansas real estate deal lead to a semen stained dress?

so - you can't name an entire team they were after then.

later on hossnuggets. i'm not playing this circular left logic today.

 

[Faun]

Nothing in your link says anything about his book jacket stating he was born in Kenya.

So again, I ask.... what the **** are you talking about?

It was on his 1991 bio.

You said it was on his book jacket.

Now we get to the point of your posts.
Semantics.Wow didnt see that coming......

LOL

What you call "semantics" is actually a lame dismissal by you after being exposed as not knowing what the **** you're talking about.

Now that we've clarified that, can you discern the difference between a book jacket, which appears in the public on millions of copies of books and represents the account of the author of the book(Obama) -- with a promotional pamphlet that was privately sent to a few thousand people on a literary agent's mailing list and represents the account of the author of the pamphlet (Acton & Dystel)?

And you didn't answer the question .... there were several news articles written around the time of that pamphlet stating Obama was born in Hawaii .... why would anyone ignore the news but accept a virtually unknown literary pamphlet?

There is plenty of info out there that brings barry's birthplace into question.

There have been no instances where a "white" potential president had any doubt cast on their birthplace for obvious reasons.

You're lying. There is not "plenty of info" out there. There is only that from his literary agent and from a foreign newspaper which misquoted an AP article; which virtually no one in the U.S. read until birthers tried to make it an issue.

So now the question is ... why are you lying?

 

[Faun]

Not even Obama had that. What the **** are you talking about?

This is why they questioned his birthplace.

Barack Obama was still 'Kenyan born' in 2007 according to his literary agency...two months after announcing his bid for the U.S presidency | Daily Mail Online

Nothing in your link says anything about his book jacket stating he was born in Kenya.

So again, I ask.... what the **** are you talking about?

It was on his 1991 bio.

It was on a pamphlet, sent only to editors within the publishing company, for Obama and other new authors, so the editors of the company could get some knowledge of who their new, up and coming authors were...

it was never produced to distribute outside of the company, it was only for insiders....

plus the INTERN that had the duty of pulling these new author bios together for their staff, ADMITS to making the MISTAKE.

not trying to stir a pot cause obama's time is over - not like this would really matter much at this point except fuel hate already in high gear - but an intern can't make that mistake on their own. it would take an intern and their editor and it would be hard to believe obama would not pre-read a book about himself very carefully. it's just his nature. could still have happened, but you're talking 3+ people making the same mistake at this point, i would think.

We don't know how many people would have seen it and we certainly don't know that Obama ever saw it. And it wasn't a "book about him."

 

[hunarcy]

Gowdy and Jordan etc were simply show boating,

And were completely, unprofessional, asses.

They should be impeached for trying to force Ray and Rosenstein to break the rules and protocol and best practices for on going investigations....

And they DO NOT care about what they are asking for....

They haven't even read, the thousands of documents they forced Rosenstein to turn over....

They are playing DIRTY TRICKS.... SAD.

Why don't people know ANYTHING? Members of Congress cannot be impeached. Impeachment is only used to remove members of the Executive Branch from their jobs.

The word should have been expulsion instead of impeachment. The should face expulsion from congress for trying to force Ray and Rosenstein to break the rules and protocol and best practices for on going investigations.

THAT is correct.

 

[hunarcy]

Gowdy and Jordan etc were simply show boating,

And were completely, unprofessional, asses.

They should be impeached for trying to force Ray and Rosenstein to break the rules and protocol and best practices for on going investigations....

And they DO NOT care about what they are asking for....

They haven't even read, the thousands of documents they forced Rosenstein to turn over....

They are playing DIRTY TRICKS.... SAD.

Why don't people know ANYTHING? Members of Congress cannot be impeached. Impeachment is only used to remove members of the Executive Branch from their jobs.

yeah, WHY don't they Know anything?

At the federal level, Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 of the Constitution grants to the House of Representatives "the sole power of impeachment", and Article I, Section 3, Clause 6 grants to the Senate "the sole Power to try all Impeachments". In considering articles of impeachment, the House is obligated to base any charges on the constitutional standards specified in Article II, Section 4: "The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors".[2] (Full text of clauses )

Recall of Legislators and the Removal
of Members of Congress from Office
Congressional Research Service
Summary
Under the United States Constitution and congressional practice, Members of Congress may have
their services ended prior to the normal expiration of their constitutionally established terms of
office by their resignation or death, or by action of the house of Congress in which they are a
Member by way of an “expulsion,” or by a findin
g that in accepting a subsequent “incompatible”
public office, the Member would be deemed to have vacated his congressional seat.
Under Article I, Section 5, clause 2, of the Constitution, a Member of Congress may be removed
from office before the normal expiration of his or her constitutional term by an “expulsion” from
the Senate (if a Senator) or from the House of Representatives (if a Representative) upon a formal
vote on a resolution agreed to by two-thirds of
the Members of that body present and voting.
While there are no specific grounds for an expulsion expressed in the Constitution, expulsion
actions in both the House and the Senate have generally concerned cases of perceived disloyalty
to the United States, or the conviction of a criminal statutory offense which involved abuse of
one’s official position. Each house has broad authority as to the grounds, nature, timing, and
procedure for an expulsion of a Member. However,
policy
considerations, as opposed to questions
of authority, have appeared to restrain the Senate and House in the exercise of expulsion when it
might be considered as infringing on the electoral process, such as when the electorate knew of
the past misconduct under consideration and still elected or re-elected the Member.

https://www.rexsresources.com/uploads/6/5/2/1/6521405/ee067ba0-db71-4394-9a37-453316aeb453.pdf

It is called an expulsion, and needs 2/3's vote of the chamber

Yep!

 

[Nosmo King]

Two and a half years. That's how long Gowdy's Great Benghazi Adventure lasted. Withno indictments, no convictions, no guilty pleas and no prison time served. Two and a half years lasting until just after the 2016 elections when he announced 'nothing to see here!'

Meanwhile, the Mueller investigation has gone on for 13 months with lots of indictments, guilty pleas, charges filed and, in some cases already, jail time served.

Whitewater was on for longer. Watergate was on for longer.

It's clear that Trump's political allies want this to end, but justice does not start and stop on the urging of political allies.

it's clear people want this to end.

name 1 "conviction" that is actually tied to RUSSIA and the core reason for the "investigation"

That's the standard? The standard isn't let the investigation run its course? How much evidence did Cohen provide? Is it fair to understand all that means? Federal prosecutors run an investigation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

Name one conviction that actually tied Sec. Clinton to a crime in Benghazi. And that lasted two and a half years.

they weren't shotgunning it go after everyone and anyone that they could as far as i know. they were after hillary.

the left again is just after whatever they can get. just stop pretending this is anything other than petty revenge politics.

Gee! I wonder how an Arkansas real estate deal lead to a semen stained dress?

so - you can't name an entire team they were after then.

later on hossnuggets. i'm not playing this circular left logic today.

Trapped in the echo chamber I see.

 

[Coyote]

Nothing in your link says anything about his book jacket stating he was born in Kenya.

So again, I ask.... what the **** are you talking about?

It was on his 1991 bio.

You said it was on his book jacket.

Now we get to the point of your posts.
Semantics.Wow didnt see that coming......

LOL

What you call "semantics" is actually a lame dismissal by you after being exposed as not knowing what the **** you're talking about.

Now that we've clarified that, can you discern the difference between a book jacket, which appears in the public on millions of copies of books and represents the account of the author of the book(Obama) -- with a promotional pamphlet that was privately sent to a few thousand people on a literary agent's mailing list and represents the account of the author of the pamphlet (Acton & Dystel)?

And you didn't answer the question .... there were several news articles written around the time of that pamphlet stating Obama was born in Hawaii .... why would anyone ignore the news but accept a virtually unknown literary pamphlet?

There is plenty of info out there that brings barry's birthplace into question.

There have been no instances where a "white" potential president had any doubt cast on their birthplace for obvious reasons.

No. There hasnt been. Wait yes...McCain. But you all accepted his credentials in a way you wouldn't Obama's.

Wonder why?

 

[DrLove]

God what a clown show that was - and Howdy Gowdy may have been my favorite ...
Although Rosenstein's smackdown of Jim Jordan's was a damn close second!
"Finish it the hell up" -- in barely over a year?
F you Howdy - You took 2 and 1/2 years to finish the 9th Benghazi investigation.
And of course you quietly wrapped it up and admitted you had nothing right AFTER Hillary lost.
What an a-hole you are

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

It was on his 1991 bio.

You said it was on his book jacket.

Now we get to the point of your posts.
Semantics.Wow didnt see that coming......

LOL

What you call "semantics" is actually a lame dismissal by you after being exposed as not knowing what the **** you're talking about.

Now that we've clarified that, can you discern the difference between a book jacket, which appears in the public on millions of copies of books and represents the account of the author of the book(Obama) -- with a promotional pamphlet that was privately sent to a few thousand people on a literary agent's mailing list and represents the account of the author of the pamphlet (Acton & Dystel)?

And you didn't answer the question .... there were several news articles written around the time of that pamphlet stating Obama was born in Hawaii .... why would anyone ignore the news but accept a virtually unknown literary pamphlet?

There is plenty of info out there that brings barry's birthplace into question.

There have been no instances where a "white" potential president had any doubt cast on their birthplace for obvious reasons.

No. There hasnt been. Wait yes...McCain. But you all accepted his credentials in a way you wouldn't Obama's.

Wonder why?

Because he'd been a prominent face in politics for years while barry appeared from nowhere.

 

[Coyote]

You said it was on his book jacket.

Now we get to the point of your posts.
Semantics.Wow didnt see that coming......

LOL

What you call "semantics" is actually a lame dismissal by you after being exposed as not knowing what the **** you're talking about.

Now that we've clarified that, can you discern the difference between a book jacket, which appears in the public on millions of copies of books and represents the account of the author of the book(Obama) -- with a promotional pamphlet that was privately sent to a few thousand people on a literary agent's mailing list and represents the account of the author of the pamphlet (Acton & Dystel)?

And you didn't answer the question .... there were several news articles written around the time of that pamphlet stating Obama was born in Hawaii .... why would anyone ignore the news but accept a virtually unknown literary pamphlet?

There is plenty of info out there that brings barry's birthplace into question.

There have been no instances where a "white" potential president had any doubt cast on their birthplace for obvious reasons.

No. There hasnt been. Wait yes...McCain. But you all accepted his credentials in a way you wouldn't Obama's.

Wonder why?

Because he'd been a prominent face in politics for years while barry appeared from nowhere.

No he didnt.