It is interesting to me how "you people" ignore the basic reality of EV's.
MOST people who own EV's have more than one vehicle in the household. MOST of such people have either a garage where they park their car(s) or a place where it could be charged conveniently from home current. They will charge it every couple days and the battery will never go below 40% capacity.
MOST households will divide their vehicle use as follows: When it is easier and cheaper to use the EV, they use the EV (commuting to work, running errands, taking the kids to yoga classes, etc.). When they are going to take a trip, or won't have a chance to charge for a couple of days, they will take the ICE "CRV" (or equivalent).
Occasionally, they will take the EV to a local charging station for a quick, "free" charge, if available.
In short, there will be virtually no inconvenience whatsoever in owning an EV. It will bring about a significant savings in fuel costs annually, and the carbon footprint of the household will arguably be reduced. The ICE will benefit from having lower miles per year than before.
It is actually perverse how the anti-EV folks try to invent inconveniences and downsides that, in fact, won't come into play in the real world.
The magic numbers are already known: $35k/250mi/45min. When EV's can reach those levels, ICE cars will be like stick-shifts are now...gradually dying off, with a few holdouts refusing to embrace the inevitable.
I drive a stick.