FBI opens investigation into Letitia James

[Marener]

Tish committed wire fraud. That's a Federal felony.

With a statute of limitations. I think 10 years. As far as I can tell, almost all of this was from well over 15 years ago.

 

[Godboy]

You’re claiming the banks did appraisals and none of it was brought up at trial.

Which is WAY more absurd.

“I assumed that the representations of the assets and liabilities were broadly accurate,” Haigh said of Trump’s financial statements.

Banker says Trump’s financial statements were key to loan approvals, but there were ‘sanity checks’

A judge last month ruled Trump and his company committed years of fraud by exaggerating the value of Trump’s assets and net worth.

www.fox8live.com

Key word. ASSUMED.

It WAS brought up when they said "we thought Trumps appraisals were broadly accurate". Banks always do appraisals. Unless you have evidence to the contrary, you are dumb as hell for continuing to welcome this epic beating at my hands.

 

[Marener]

It WAS brought up when they said "we thought Trumps appraisals were broadly accurate". Banks always do appraisals. Unless you have evidence to the contrary, you are dumb as hell for continuing to welcome this epic beating at my hands.

The banker said they “assumed”. Don’t change the language.

What does “assume” mean?

1. suppose to be the case, without proof.

They didn’t have proof, I.e. appraisals, that the values were accurate.

 

[Godboy]

The banker said they “assumed”. Don’t change the language.

What does “assume” mean?

1. suppose to be the case, without proof.

They didn’t have proof, I.e. appraisals, that the values were accurate.

No bank in history hasnt done an appraisal on assets being used as collateral for massive loans. I dont know where youre getting this "assumed" word from, but they absolutely did their own appraisals.

Youre a fucking retard and your idiocy is boring me now. Just admit you are wrong you stupid fucking coward.

 

[Paradoxical#1]

Hilarious she went after Trump for EXACTLY the same thing she was doing.

We have always said, watch democrats. They DO what they accuse YOU of doing. More proof of that. Trump colluding with Russia? Nope, DEMOCRATS COLLUDED with Russia. Trump intentionally misvaluing properties for benefits? Nope, THE PROSECUTOR FOR TRUMP FOR THIS was the one doing it. I could go on and on.

The left is famous for going after Republicans for what it is THEY do because they have experience in committing fraud and getting away with it. Here she knew she lied intentionally to get a better loan deal; and since she knew how it was done, accused Trump of doing what SHE did.

Karma has reared its ugly head.

 

[Marener]

No bank in history hasnt done an appraisal on assets being used as collateral for massive loans. I dont know where youre getting this "assumed" word from, but they absolutely did their own appraisals.

Youre a fucking retard and your idiocy is boring me now. Just admit you are wrong you stupid fucking coward.

As I already explained, the assets we are discussing weren’t being used as collateral.

You really shouldn’t talk this way. I’m smarter and better informed than you.

You have provided nothing to back up your assertion and purposefully altered the language used in testimony at the trial to make it seem consistent with your narrative.

You’re very dishonest, very stupid or very delusional. I don’t know which.

 

[marvin martian]

Of course. Vindman is next. Anyone who disparaged Trump must pay.

Vindman the Russian spy?

 

[Godboy]

The banker said they “assumed”. Don’t change the language.

What does “assume” mean?

1. suppose to be the case, without proof.

They didn’t have proof, I.e. appraisals, that the values were accurate.

Here, retard...

Bankers whom Donald J. Trump is accused of defrauding testified at his civil fraud trial this week that they did not rely on his embellished claims of wealth, lending support to the central plank of the former president’s defense.

Mr. Trump has protested the premise of the case, insisting that the banks did their own due diligence and that misstatements in the financial documents would not have affected the overall terms of the loans. It follows, his lawyers have argued, that the alleged fraud had no victim.

The bankers who testified this week supported that argument when asked about the loan process.

“We are expected to conduct some due diligence and verify the information provided, to the extent that is possible,” David Williams, a banker in the wealth management group at Deutsche Bank, said on Tuesday. He said repeatedly that the bank had performed that diligence and factored its own analysis into the relationship with Mr. Trump.

Trump’s Bankers Say His Exaggerated Net Worth Did Not Affect Loans (Published 2023)

The testimony of witnesses from Deutsche Bank lent support to a central plank of former President Donald Trump’s defense in the civil fraud case against him.

www.nytimes.com

 

[Marener]

Here, retard...

Bankers whom Donald J. Trump is accused of defrauding testified at his civil fraud trial this week that they did not rely on his embellished claims of wealth, lending support to the central plank of the former president’s defense.

Mr. Trump has protested the premise of the case, insisting that the banks did their own due diligence and that misstatements in the financial documents would not have affected the overall terms of the loans. It follows, his lawyers have argued, that the alleged fraud had no victim.

The bankers who testified this week supported that argument when asked about the loan process.

“We are expected to conduct some due diligence and verify the information provided, to the extent that is possible,” David Williams, a banker in the wealth management group at Deutsche Bank, said on Tuesday. He said repeatedly that the bank had performed that diligence and factored its own analysis into the relationship with Mr. Trump.

Trump’s Bankers Say His Exaggerated Net Worth Did Not Affect Loans (Published 2023)

The testimony of witnesses from Deutsche Bank lent support to a central plank of former President Donald Trump’s defense in the civil fraud case against him.

www.nytimes.com

Do you see any mention of the bank doing appraisals in that article?

 

[marvin martian]

They assumed Trump was telling the truth on his statement. Why wouldn’t they? It’s illegal to lie in financial documents. It’s fraud.

^^^This is what someone who has never dealt with a bank, or any other financial institution, would believe. LOL

You're a dupe, and an embarrassingly unself-aware one at that.

 

[Godboy]

Do you see any mention of the bank doing appraisals in that article?

How else would they verify his assets worth? Bro, whats wrong with your brain? You really suck at this.

 

[marvin martian]

How else would they verify his assets worth? Bro, whats wrong with your brain? You really suck at this.

It's clear Marener has never had any interaction with a financial institution other than probably a basic checking account.

No one who's had significant life experience believes banks give loans based on a client's word.

 

[Papageorgio]

How are the alleged illegal actions of James morphed into another but… but… but… Trump thread?

Let them go after James, if she is committed a felony then she needs to be punished, like everyone else.

 

[Marener]

How else would they verify his assets worth? Bro, whats wrong with your brain? You really suck at this.

That was discussed at trial. I thought you said you watched it?

They didn’t do appraisals. Yet again, you’re making assumptions.

All this attention to this case. So many statements, so much testimony, so many articles.

No ONE mention that the bank did independent appraisals. But we are supposed to believe you?

 

[Marener]

It's clear Marener has never had any interaction with a financial institution other than probably a basic checking account.

No one who's had significant life experience believes banks give loans based on a client's word.

You can do your little co-cultist a huge favor by providing any evidence that Deutsche Bank did an independent appraisal on the properties in question.

Because Godboy has been flailing for a long time now and I’m not sure how long he can keep up the facade.

 

[Godboy]

That was discussed at trial. I thought you said you watched it?

They didn’t do appraisals. Yet again, you’re making assumptions.

All this attention to this case. So many statements, so much testimony, so many articles.

No ONE mention that the bank did independent appraisals. But we are supposed to believe you?

Why would anyone "mention that the banks did appraisals" in the hearing? Thats a given on any significant loan, let alone a multi hundred million dollar loan.

They said they "did their due dilligence". What the fuck would that entail OTHER than doing an appraisal? Is there some miracle short cut that us appraisers arent aware of? Please inform me and i will use your trick to start the most profitable appraisal company in the world.

 

[Marener]

Why would anyone "mention that the banks did appraisals" in the hearing? Thats a given on any significant loan, let alone a multi hundred million dollar loan.

This is hands down the dumbest fucking question you have said so far.

If the bank did appraisals, that would be VERY relevant and could exonerate Trump.

Why WOULDNT they mention it at trial? Why WOUDLNT they mention it anywhere else in any other context?

They said they "did their due dilligence". What the fuck would that entail OTHER than doing an appraisal? Is there some miracle short cut that us appraisers arent aware of?

This was explained extensively during the trial, and the “due diligence” was hilariously and embarrassingly simplistic. They took Trump’s numbers and divided by 2.

 

[Godboy]

This is hands down the dumbest fucking question you have said so far.

If the bank did appraisals, that would be VERY relevant and could exonerate Trump.

Why WOULDNT they mention it at trial? Why WOUDLNT they mention it anywhere else in any other context?



This was explained extensively during the trial, and the “due diligence” was hilariously and embarrassingly simplistic. They took Trump’s numbers and divided by 2.

They did their appraisals which is why Trump WILL be exhonerated. You actually thought a bank would hand someone $400,000,000 dollars without checking the value of his assets?

Seriously, you are standing behind the dumbest fucking position ive seen at USMB for a LONG time. You just completely disregard reality and common sense and its super god damn weird. Something is seriously wrong with you.

 

[Marener]

They did their appraisals which is why Trump WILL be exhonerated. You actually thought a bank would hand someone $400,000,000 dollars without checking the value of his assets?

Seriously, you are standing behind the dumbest fucking position ive seen at USMB for a LONG time. You just completely disregard reality and common sense and its super god damn weird. Something is seriously wrong with you.

Reality is banks didn’t do their own appraisals for the properties in question.

You can’t explain why there is ZERO evidence they did in any media source, testimony or documentation.

You believe they did because you want to believe it. That’s not reality. That’s self deception.

 

[marvin martian]

They did their appraisals which is why Trump WILL be exhonerated. You actually thought a bank would hand someone $400,000,000 dollars without checking the value of his assets?

Seriously, you are standing behind the dumbest fucking position ive seen at USMB for a LONG time. You just completely disregard reality and common sense and its super god damn weird. Something is seriously wrong with you.

Marener is coming from a place of deep, deep ignorance, fear, and hatred. People like that are not rational.

At any rate, this thread is about the alleged crimes of Leticia James. Don't let the weirdos turn it into another Trump hate-fest.