For one we have to pay interest on it for two yes it's true the government gets the money through capitalism..The government gets the money through capitalismLMFAO from the link, he never said anything about the land feeding people..
What farmers do with their land has a huge impact on water quality, wildlife and climate change, Kling says. The USDA has programs that pay farmers to help the environment, doing things like restoring wetlands.
The government paying farmers is capitalism? Where do I find this so I can learn more?
You can't comprehend what I posted?
This fuck head bitches about climate change and the like but never mentions the land being used to grow food.
Can you show where I have even mentioned climate change?
Once again from the link...
What farmers do with their land has a huge impact on water quality, wildlife and climate change, Kling says. The USDA has programs that pay farmers to help the environment, doing things like restoring wetlands.
OK, now once again, where in Capitalism do we find the government paying business to do anything?
Why do you pretend to support things you aren't even able to defend?
Is that right? LOL
The Fed doesn't just create it?
All the same even if true (which it isn't) again, how is taking from those who created it to give to others capitalism?
We didn't "borrow" the money that was used to create years and years of Quantitative Easing.
Name one bank that has the money? There is none. You can't show a single bank that has money directly from the Fed, or the Government, from Quantitative Easing.
Show me. Post the government document, showing which bank simply "got money" from the government. There is none.
Because the way Quantitative Easing works, is that it moves assets and credits around.
If you sell me a car, did you get the money for nothing? No, we trade asset for value.
Let me put it another way.
I'm not sure why they put China on there in red.... .whatever. It makes my point.
See the blue line? That's from 1980 to 2018. There is not particularly significant increase in the total money supply.
There certainly is no dramatic change in the money supply from quantitative easing.
Now I'm against Quantitative Easing, because it places the government into buying assets with uncertain value. It's simply not a wise move, that could pose future problems.
But your dumb as crap ignorant claims about how companies are only in business because the Fed is printing money... you are dumb fool, saying utterly ignorant crap.