Do you have a link to support that claim? Because the information I have seen has been mostly very vague on that, and if my understanding of the victims being all, or nearly all white, is incorrect that does change some things some.
Sure, no problem.
Rotherham: ‘It’s sad that it’s taken something so horrific to give voice to these girls’
Muslim Women Network
Jay Report into child sexual exploitation in Rotherham
Normally in this type of situation, I would demand that instead of a link, or worse a series of links, that you show me where the point is.
BUT, I really wanted this information, because I have looked and not been able to find it, so I looked at your links.
THe first one, is the only one on topic.
It refers to the victims of the Rotherham Ring as "mostly white", and then wanders a bit, and then starts talking about other girls, non white girls being preyed on by older men.
The context IMPLIES that there might be overlap between the rotherham ring and the set of predators that they are referring to, but the claim is not actually MADE.
And, there is nothing I saw about who many non-whites, if any, were molested by the rotherham ring.
So, "mostly white"? Does that mean 51%? Or does that mean 1399 white girls and one black?
This is a reoccurring issue I have with protections for minors. I understand the reason for it. But we as a society need these answers so that we can understand the problem(s) we are facing.
THe other two links, make the case that while the Rotherham Rape Ring was going on, other people were committing other crimes, sometimes against young girls.
It is silly of you to post them. I will not insult your intelligence by explaining why.
I don't think the numbers are available. I think the numbers have been suppressed by the UK government to hide how bad it is.