Everyones favourite football hooligan/drug dealer/fraudster/wife beater in trouble again

[Dogmaphobe]

My youngest is on lockdown at the moment. Its very worrying.

Your youngest what?

 

[Correll]

Tommy Robinson faces assault charge after Center Parcs arrest
The former English Defence League leader Tommy Robinson has been charged with common assault following an incident at Center Parcs in Bedfordshire.

Bedfordshire police said the 37-year-old, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, was due to appear at Luton magistrates court on 2 April and had been released on bail.

I hope the courts show some compassion. Tommy hasnt been in trouble all year.

Hasn't he only just got out of prison?

He has been out for 6 months at least.This just sounds like a row rather than one of his stunts.

Reveals a lot about his character though.

You're assuming he's the bad guy?

You Tell Me

In April 2005 at Luton Crown Court, Robinson was convicted of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and assault with intent to resist arrest against an off-duty police officer in July 2004. The officer had intervened in an argument in the street between Robinson and his then girlfriend, Jenna Vowles. In the struggle that followed, Robinson kicked the officer in the head as he laid on the ground. Robinson received sentences of 12 months and 3 months, which were served concurrently.[1]

In September 2011, at Preston Magistrates' Court, Robinson was convicted of assault for headbutting a man in Blackburn on 2 April 2011.[6][4] In November 2011, he was given a 12-week jail term, suspended for 12 months.[7]

Public order offence
In July 2011, at Luton and South Bedfordshire Magistrates' Court, Robinson was convicted of using threatening, abusive or insulting behaviour, for leading a group of Luton Town F.C. supporters into a brawl involving 100 people in Luton on 24 August 2010. He was sentenced to a 12-month community rehabilitation order, 150 hours of unpaid work and given a three-year football banning order.[2][3]

False passport
In October 2012, Robinson was arrested and held on the charge of having entered the United States illegally. Robinson pleaded guilty at Southwark Crown Court to using someone else's passport to travel to the United States in September 2012, and was sentenced in January 2013 to 10 months' imprisonment.[10][11][190]

Robinson had used a passport in the name of Andrew McMaster to board a Virgin Atlantic flight from Heathrow to New York.[10] He had been banned from entering the US due to his criminal record. When he arrived at New York's JFK Airport, customs officials who took his fingerprints realised he was not McMaster. He was asked to attend a second interview but left the airport, entering the US illegally. He stayed one night and returned to the UK the following day using his own legitimate passport – which bears the name Paul Harris.[9]

Judge Alistair McCreath told him: "What you did went absolutely to the heart of the immigration controls that the United States are entitled to have. It's not in any sense trivial."[10]

He was released on electronic tag on 22 February 2013.[191]

Fraud
In November 2012, Robinson was charged with three counts of conspiracy to commit fraud by misrepresentation in relation to a mortgage application, along with five other defendants.[192] He pleaded guilty to two charges and in January 2014 was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment.[13][190]

Robinson's fraud amounted to £160,000 over a period of six months. Judge Andrew Bright QC described him as the "instigator, if not the architect" of a series of frauds totalling £640,000. "This was an operation which was fraudulent from the outset and involved a significant amount of forward planning." He described Robinson as a "fixer" who had introduced others to fraudulent mortgage broker Deborah Rothschild. Rothschild had assisted some defendants by providing fake pay slips and income details.[14]

Tommy Robinson (activist) - Wikipedia

Funny, you didnt' catch that I was talking about your assumption in the current case? I thought that was pretty obvious.

 

[Correll]

You're assuming he's the bad guy?

If you define child-raping savages as the good guys, then of course, people like Tommy Robinson, who dare to speak out against them, must be the bad guys.

Isaiah 5:20 comes to mind.

It is so funny, to see these brits making such a fuss over shit like reporting on a trial, or verbal abuse, when their government let a rape ring operate for years, raping literally thousands of white children, enslaving many of them, torturing them.


In a sane world, Tommy would be getting the pass, while the brit government would be facing trials for their criminal betrayal of their people.

 

[Correll]

The Brits don't like it, when you report on their rape rings.

What did the Human Rights Commission have to say about the rape rings your government allowed to operate, out of fear being called racist?

You seem to have an extraordinary fixation on introducing this topic of rape gangs and those exploiting children for sex. Perhaps it's just an American male thing.

Child Sex Trafficking
US History of Sexual Exploitation of Children (News) - Women At Risk International™
Child Trafficking and Sexual Exploitation in the United States
Child sexual exploitation in the USA: Not just a problem for developing nations

That's just a sample, Google "child sex exploitation in usa" and you get 13,500,000 results. People in glass houses...

It seems extraordinary to me, that the local government knew of the ring operating, and let it continue, out of fear of being called racist.

AND that furthermore, that this information came out, and resulted in no serious debate of the policies that created the situation.


That level of ideological commitment to an obviously terrible set of policies, is terrifying to me. I worry that the lefties over here in this country are just as bat shit crazy, and that somehow, they will inflict similar levels of crazy and harm to our society.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

It is so funny, to see these brits making such a fuss over shit like reporting on a trial, or verbal abuse, when their government let a rape ring operate for years, raping literally thousands of white children, enslaving many of them, torturing them.


In a sane world, Tommy would be getting the pass, while the brit government would be facing trials for their criminal betrayal of their people.

Funny isn't the word I would use. It's tragic, a people allowing this to be done to them.

Americans need to pay attention to what is going on in the UK, and other parts of Europe, where the governments are allowing their countries to be overrun, and their own people to be victimized, by inhuman savages from shithole nations. The Democrats/LIbErals here in our own country want to do the same thing to us, and if they succeed, the consequences for us will be the same as what we've been seeing over there.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

What is funny is the nonsense that you racist shits give a fuck about the victims. Why do you never criticise the many rapists in the US ? Your fucking Pres is a rapist.

 

[Correll]

What is funny is the nonsense that you racist shits give a fuck about the victims. Why do you never criticise the many rapists in the US ? Your fucking Pres is a rapist.

That question has been answered many times. That you keep asking it, is you playing stupid rhetorical games to dodge the issue.


The policies that you support led to those rape rings being created AND ALLOWED TO OPERATE.


That is the point. You are still supporting those policies, despite their terrible results and despite that fact that they are and will continue to have such results in the future.


That is why these cases deserve more discussion. Because only in this case, does the rapists have defenders.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

What is funny is the nonsense that you racist shits give a fuck about the victims. Why do you never criticise the many rapists in the US ? Your fucking Pres is a rapist.

That question has been answered many times. That you keep asking it, is you playing stupid rhetorical games to dodge the issue.


The policies that you support led to those rape rings being created AND ALLOWED TO OPERATE.


That is the point. You are still supporting those policies, despite their terrible results and despite that fact that they are and will continue to have such results in the future.


That is why these cases deserve more discussion. Because only in this case, does the rapists have defenders.

Which policy am I supporting ?

 

[Vagabond63]

Hasn't he only just got out of prison?

He has been out for 6 months at least.This just sounds like a row rather than one of his stunts.

Reveals a lot about his character though.

You're assuming he's the bad guy?

You Tell Me

In April 2005 at Luton Crown Court, Robinson was convicted of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and assault with intent to resist arrest against an off-duty police officer in July 2004. The officer had intervened in an argument in the street between Robinson and his then girlfriend, Jenna Vowles. In the struggle that followed, Robinson kicked the officer in the head as he laid on the ground. Robinson received sentences of 12 months and 3 months, which were served concurrently.[1]

In September 2011, at Preston Magistrates' Court, Robinson was convicted of assault for headbutting a man in Blackburn on 2 April 2011.[6][4] In November 2011, he was given a 12-week jail term, suspended for 12 months.[7]

Public order offence
In July 2011, at Luton and South Bedfordshire Magistrates' Court, Robinson was convicted of using threatening, abusive or insulting behaviour, for leading a group of Luton Town F.C. supporters into a brawl involving 100 people in Luton on 24 August 2010. He was sentenced to a 12-month community rehabilitation order, 150 hours of unpaid work and given a three-year football banning order.[2][3]

False passport
In October 2012, Robinson was arrested and held on the charge of having entered the United States illegally. Robinson pleaded guilty at Southwark Crown Court to using someone else's passport to travel to the United States in September 2012, and was sentenced in January 2013 to 10 months' imprisonment.[10][11][190]

Robinson had used a passport in the name of Andrew McMaster to board a Virgin Atlantic flight from Heathrow to New York.[10] He had been banned from entering the US due to his criminal record. When he arrived at New York's JFK Airport, customs officials who took his fingerprints realised he was not McMaster. He was asked to attend a second interview but left the airport, entering the US illegally. He stayed one night and returned to the UK the following day using his own legitimate passport – which bears the name Paul Harris.[9]

Judge Alistair McCreath told him: "What you did went absolutely to the heart of the immigration controls that the United States are entitled to have. It's not in any sense trivial."[10]

He was released on electronic tag on 22 February 2013.[191]

Fraud
In November 2012, Robinson was charged with three counts of conspiracy to commit fraud by misrepresentation in relation to a mortgage application, along with five other defendants.[192] He pleaded guilty to two charges and in January 2014 was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment.[13][190]

Robinson's fraud amounted to £160,000 over a period of six months. Judge Andrew Bright QC described him as the "instigator, if not the architect" of a series of frauds totalling £640,000. "This was an operation which was fraudulent from the outset and involved a significant amount of forward planning." He described Robinson as a "fixer" who had introduced others to fraudulent mortgage broker Deborah Rothschild. Rothschild had assisted some defendants by providing fake pay slips and income details.[14]

Tommy Robinson (activist) - Wikipedia

Funny, you didnt' catch that I was talking about your assumption in the current case? I thought that was pretty obvious.

If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.

 

[Vagabond63]

You're assuming he's the bad guy?

If you define child-raping savages as the good guys, then of course, people like Tommy Robinson, who dare to speak out against them, must be the bad guys.

Isaiah 5:20 comes to mind.

See post #10

 

[Vagabond63]

You seem to have an extraordinary fixation on introducing this topic of rape gangs and those exploiting children for sex. Perhaps it's just an American male thing.

Child Sex Trafficking
US History of Sexual Exploitation of Children (News) - Women At Risk International™
Child Trafficking and Sexual Exploitation in the United States
Child sexual exploitation in the USA: Not just a problem for developing nations

That's just a sample, Google "child sex exploitation in usa" and you get 13,500,000 results. People in glass houses...

A pathetic attempt at a tu quoque argument. Utterly pathetic. We're talking Tainted Tommy levels of pathetic.

Do any of your links describe instances of anyone openly defending and protecting those who sexually abuse children, and of people being criminally prosecuted for speaking out against such abuses?

Thanks, that's exactly the reponse I was expecting. I'll see your tu quoque and raise you your straw man. No-one, to my knowledge, ever openly defended or protected those criminals. The local authorities in Rotherham made fallacious assumptions and mistakes, and paid for them. I admire people like Jayne Senior, Adel Wier and Angela Heal who courageously spoke out and reported the abuse, and I also admire Nazir Afzal who insisted on prosecuting the offenders when the CPS turned the case down. As for Steven Yaxley-Lennon, his motives were just to persue his far-right racist and anti-Islamic agenda; he didn't care one jot about the victims, which is why he deliberately jeoparised the trial of their abusers; there is very little difference between Yaxley-Lennon and the gang members of the Rotherham gang; both are cut from the same cloth, in my view, scum.

 

[Lysistrata]

This clown has a rap sheet as long as your arm. He knows damn well that his actions violate British law, and he made a deliberate attempt to prejudice the outcome of the trial of the rape gang. I guess he just wanted the gang members to walk.

What is really shocking to me, as an American, is that two American scumbags are helping this guy. One is a billionaire who is funding this guy's antics, to the tune of $6,000, and the other is some Kansas trash, whom our orange whore appointed as something laughably called "the U.S. ambassador for international religious freedom," who lobbied the British government for leniency for this robinson, who is one of the leaders of the fight against religious freedom.

Slowly, this international conspiracy to disrupt society and endanger public safety in several countries is being revealed. It is scary that these people have operated under the radar for so long, and sometimes with the help of the current U.S. government.

 

[Jitss617]

Tommy America has your back!

 

[Tommy Tainant]

This clown has a rap sheet as long as your arm. He knows damn well that his actions violate British law, and he made a deliberate attempt to prejudice the outcome of the trial of the rape gang. I guess he just wanted the gang members to walk.

What is really shocking to me, as an American, is that two American scumbags are helping this guy. One is a billionaire who is funding this guy's antics, to the tune of $6,000, and the other is some Kansas trash, whom our orange whore appointed as something laughably called "the U.S. ambassador for international religious freedom," who lobbied the British government for leniency for this robinson, who is one of the leaders of the fight against religious freedom.

Slowly, this international conspiracy to disrupt society and endanger public safety in several countries is being revealed. It is scary that these people have operated under the radar for so long, and sometimes with the help of the current U.S. government.

His American backers could be considered instigators. He must deliver regular outrage to justify his cheque.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

See post #10

Referring back to a post that was bullshit when it was first posted, does not make it any less bullshit when revisited.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

As for Steven Yaxley-Lennon, his motives were just to persue [sic] his far-right racist and anti-Islamic agenda; he didn't care one jot about the victims…

Your kind just can't help yourselves, can you?

Even when you manage to start out sounding almost reasonable, you unavoidably fall into the same deranged madness, viz., that standing up for innocent children, opposing subhuman savages who were raping children, is part of a “far-right racist and anti-Islamic agenda”.

By the way, being an extreme violent Islamist child-raping savage is not a race, therefore, it is not racist to oppose such, no matter how much you may sympathize with such subhuman filth.

A sane person has to know, when a subhuman piece of left wrong-wing pedophile-loving shit such as yourself uses the word “racist” in connection with an issue that has absolutely nothing to do with race, that said piece of shit already knows damn well that he's hopelessly lost the argument.

 

[Correll]

What is funny is the nonsense that you racist shits give a fuck about the victims. Why do you never criticise the many rapists in the US ? Your fucking Pres is a rapist.

That question has been answered many times. That you keep asking it, is you playing stupid rhetorical games to dodge the issue.


The policies that you support led to those rape rings being created AND ALLOWED TO OPERATE.


That is the point. You are still supporting those policies, despite their terrible results and despite that fact that they are and will continue to have such results in the future.


That is why these cases deserve more discussion. Because only in this case, does the rapists have defenders.

Which policy am I supporting ?

The big one, is the policy of obsessively looking for any hint of even perceived racism and destroying or marginalizing people based on the slightest hint of it, so that cops and social workers were afraid to stop the rape rings,for fear of being called racist.


You obviously support that. YOu are doing it right now.

 

[Correll]

He has been out for 6 months at least.This just sounds like a row rather than one of his stunts.

Reveals a lot about his character though.

You're assuming he's the bad guy?

You Tell Me

In April 2005 at Luton Crown Court, Robinson was convicted of assault occasioning actual bodily harm and assault with intent to resist arrest against an off-duty police officer in July 2004. The officer had intervened in an argument in the street between Robinson and his then girlfriend, Jenna Vowles. In the struggle that followed, Robinson kicked the officer in the head as he laid on the ground. Robinson received sentences of 12 months and 3 months, which were served concurrently.[1]

In September 2011, at Preston Magistrates' Court, Robinson was convicted of assault for headbutting a man in Blackburn on 2 April 2011.[6][4] In November 2011, he was given a 12-week jail term, suspended for 12 months.[7]

Public order offence
In July 2011, at Luton and South Bedfordshire Magistrates' Court, Robinson was convicted of using threatening, abusive or insulting behaviour, for leading a group of Luton Town F.C. supporters into a brawl involving 100 people in Luton on 24 August 2010. He was sentenced to a 12-month community rehabilitation order, 150 hours of unpaid work and given a three-year football banning order.[2][3]

False passport
In October 2012, Robinson was arrested and held on the charge of having entered the United States illegally. Robinson pleaded guilty at Southwark Crown Court to using someone else's passport to travel to the United States in September 2012, and was sentenced in January 2013 to 10 months' imprisonment.[10][11][190]

Robinson had used a passport in the name of Andrew McMaster to board a Virgin Atlantic flight from Heathrow to New York.[10] He had been banned from entering the US due to his criminal record. When he arrived at New York's JFK Airport, customs officials who took his fingerprints realised he was not McMaster. He was asked to attend a second interview but left the airport, entering the US illegally. He stayed one night and returned to the UK the following day using his own legitimate passport – which bears the name Paul Harris.[9]

Judge Alistair McCreath told him: "What you did went absolutely to the heart of the immigration controls that the United States are entitled to have. It's not in any sense trivial."[10]

He was released on electronic tag on 22 February 2013.[191]

Fraud
In November 2012, Robinson was charged with three counts of conspiracy to commit fraud by misrepresentation in relation to a mortgage application, along with five other defendants.[192] He pleaded guilty to two charges and in January 2014 was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment.[13][190]

Robinson's fraud amounted to £160,000 over a period of six months. Judge Andrew Bright QC described him as the "instigator, if not the architect" of a series of frauds totalling £640,000. "This was an operation which was fraudulent from the outset and involved a significant amount of forward planning." He described Robinson as a "fixer" who had introduced others to fraudulent mortgage broker Deborah Rothschild. Rothschild had assisted some defendants by providing fake pay slips and income details.[14]

Tommy Robinson (activist) - Wikipedia

Funny, you didnt' catch that I was talking about your assumption in the current case? I thought that was pretty obvious.

If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.

What about if it looks like someone who is speaking out strongly against established government policy, that has led to horrific abuses of white children and the government wants to silence him and anyone that dares agree with him?

Does the rape of thousands of children, weight in your consideration at all?

 

[Correll]

You're assuming he's the bad guy?

If you define child-raping savages as the good guys, then of course, people like Tommy Robinson, who dare to speak out against them, must be the bad guys.

Isaiah 5:20 comes to mind.

See post #10

You seem more upset over a couple of minor crimes, spread over years, than the rape of thousands of children with the government allowing it.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

You're assuming he's the bad guy?

If you define child-raping savages as the good guys, then of course, people like Tommy Robinson, who dare to speak out against them, must be the bad guys.

Isaiah 5:20 comes to mind.

See post #10

You seem more upset over a couple of minor crimes, spread over years, than the rape of thousands of children with the government allowing it.

A far more worrying report about paedos was released this week implicating the government in a cover up. As yet Lennon has not seen fit to comment and neither has his US clown posse. I wonder why the racist shit isnt interested.