Event 201 Scenario

g5000

Diamond Member
Nov 26, 2011
123,586
55,363
2,290
Check this out. Last October, Johns Hopkins actually war-gamed a coronavirus pandemic: The Event 201 scenario | A pandemic tabletop exercise

Event 201 simulates an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.

<snip>

There is no possibility of a vaccine being available in the first year. There is a fictional antiviral drug that can help the sick but not significantly limit spread of the disease.

Since the whole human population is susceptible, during the initial months of the pandemic, the cumulative number of cases increases exponentially, doubling every week. And as the cases and deaths accumulate, the economic and societal consequences become increasingly severe.

The scenario ends at the 18-month point, with 65 million deaths.
 
Death Panels: Hospitals consider universal do-not-resuscitate orders for coronavirus patients

Hospitals on the front lines of the pandemic are engaged in a heated private debate over a calculation few have encountered in their lifetimes — how to weigh the “save at all costs” approach to resuscitating a dying patient against the real danger of exposing doctors and nurses to the contagion of coronavirus.

The conversations are driven by the realization that the risk to staff amid dwindling stores of protective equipment — such as masks, gowns and gloves — may be too great to justify the conventional response when a patient “codes,” and their heart or breathing stops.
 
Death Panels: Hospitals consider universal do-not-resuscitate orders for coronavirus patients

Hospitals on the front lines of the pandemic are engaged in a heated private debate over a calculation few have encountered in their lifetimes — how to weigh the “save at all costs” approach to resuscitating a dying patient against the real danger of exposing doctors and nurses to the contagion of coronavirus.

The conversations are driven by the realization that the risk to staff amid dwindling stores of protective equipment — such as masks, gowns and gloves — may be too great to justify the conventional response when a patient “codes,” and their heart or breathing stops.


Too late.

I've had one for about 5 years
 
Death Panels: Hospitals consider universal do-not-resuscitate orders for coronavirus patients

Hospitals on the front lines of the pandemic are engaged in a heated private debate over a calculation few have encountered in their lifetimes — how to weigh the “save at all costs” approach to resuscitating a dying patient against the real danger of exposing doctors and nurses to the contagion of coronavirus.

The conversations are driven by the realization that the risk to staff amid dwindling stores of protective equipment — such as masks, gowns and gloves — may be too great to justify the conventional response when a patient “codes,” and their heart or breathing stops.


They just debunked that shit at the presser 5 minutes ago. Fake news
 
Death Panels: Hospitals consider universal do-not-resuscitate orders for coronavirus patients

Hospitals on the front lines of the pandemic are engaged in a heated private debate over a calculation few have encountered in their lifetimes — how to weigh the “save at all costs” approach to resuscitating a dying patient against the real danger of exposing doctors and nurses to the contagion of coronavirus.

The conversations are driven by the realization that the risk to staff amid dwindling stores of protective equipment — such as masks, gowns and gloves — may be too great to justify the conventional response when a patient “codes,” and their heart or breathing stops.


They just debunked that shit at the presser 5 minutes ago. Fake news
If Trump called it "fake news", then you can be 99 percent certain it's true.
 
Death Panels: Hospitals consider universal do-not-resuscitate orders for coronavirus patients

Hospitals on the front lines of the pandemic are engaged in a heated private debate over a calculation few have encountered in their lifetimes — how to weigh the “save at all costs” approach to resuscitating a dying patient against the real danger of exposing doctors and nurses to the contagion of coronavirus.

The conversations are driven by the realization that the risk to staff amid dwindling stores of protective equipment — such as masks, gowns and gloves — may be too great to justify the conventional response when a patient “codes,” and their heart or breathing stops.


They just debunked that shit at the presser 5 minutes ago. Fake news
If Trump called it "fake news", then you can be 99 percent certain it's true.



It's idiots like you pushing fake news and rumors that creates a circle jerk. You obviously don't know about do not resuscitate documents you need to have and why they're available. It will break dozens of bones and they'll rip your chest open sometimes. Not good for a 90 year old but it is his decision.

Dipshit social media cucks all over the place now days.

So take this shit down. It's just part of the problem.
 
Check this out. Last October, Johns Hopkins actually war-gamed a coronavirus pandemic: The Event 201 scenario | A pandemic tabletop exercise

Event 201 simulates an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.

<snip>

There is no possibility of a vaccine being available in the first year. There is a fictional antiviral drug that can help the sick but not significantly limit spread of the disease.

Since the whole human population is susceptible, during the initial months of the pandemic, the cumulative number of cases increases exponentially, doubling every week. And as the cases and deaths accumulate, the economic and societal consequences become increasingly severe.

The scenario ends at the 18-month point, with 65 million deaths.
Why does that remind me of the "FBI Foils FBI Terror Plot" headline?
 
Simply astounding.


October 2019: Event 201

October 2022: Catastrophic-contagion

Bill and Melinda Gates

 
1671484236814.png
1671484303413.png




Remember folks. October 2019, Event 201, simulated a worldwide pandemic, controlling the narrative, squashing any who question authorities, mandating vaccines, etc, and then magically it appears in december 2019. Here's the latest, Catastrophic Contagion, another simulation, october 2022. Except.......this one is much deadlier. Amazing how they know whats about to happen. Almost as if they already know about their little lab germs.
 

Attachments

  • 0 bytes · Views: 0
Check this out. Last October, Johns Hopkins actually war-gamed a coronavirus pandemic: The Event 201 scenario | A pandemic tabletop exercise

Event 201 simulates an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.

<snip>

There is no possibility of a vaccine being available in the first year. There is a fictional antiviral drug that can help the sick but not significantly limit spread of the disease.

Since the whole human population is susceptible, during the initial months of the pandemic, the cumulative number of cases increases exponentially, doubling every week. And as the cases and deaths accumulate, the economic and societal consequences become increasingly severe.

The scenario ends at the 18-month point, with 65 million deaths.

65 million dead? You fear porn addicts must have loved that one.

In reality, president Trump did an amazing job and fewer than 400,000 of those 65 million predicted actually died while he was president.

Joe Biden did significantly worse, with over 700,000 dead so far. But those of us not in your cult knew Biden would be a disaster for Covid deaths.

1671484806786.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top