Durham 3 Year Investigation Convened

[citygator]

Noooooo! I was promised stuff! These bullshit threads did not age well. It’s 1/6th of them. Righties will believe anything they want to.

Durham finally has his smoking gun

On the Special Counsel’s Weird Prosecution of Michael Sussmann But now Durham has spoken on his own. He has indicted a cybersecurity lawyer named Michael Sussmann for allegedly making a single false statement in a conversation in 2016 with then-FBI General Counsel Jim Baker. The allegedly false...

www.usmessageboard.com

Former DNI says many more Durham indictments to come

“When I became the director of national intelligence, I said listen, I want to see all of the intelligence about this supposed Russian collusion, and what I found was, and as you’re finding out, is there was, of course, no Russian collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, but what I did...

www.usmessageboard.com

Durham probe will lead to indictments 'at the top' in coming months.

Those of you who will say keep saying "any day now", keep hoping. The second Domino has fallen. Former Pentagon chief of staff Kash Patel discussed the investigation, predicting indictments potentially targeting Fusion GPS and Glenn Simpson.

www.usmessageboard.com

Durham's Investigation Is Much Farther Reaching Than Originally Thought

It took longer than expected but results appear to be close. ---After years of silence, we finally started to get news regarding John Durham’s probe into the Trump-Russia investigation.---...

www.usmessageboard.com

The Durham Indictment Is in and It's Big After All: Yes, It's Tied to the Hillary Campaign!

Red State ^ | 09/16/2021 | Nick Arama We reported yesterday word that an indictment might be coming in the Durham investigation and that it would be a person of some significance — Michael Sussman, who worked for Perkins Coie, the firm that represented both Hillary Clinton and the Democratic...

www.usmessageboard.com

Cruz: best thing that ever happened to Putin "tragically" is the election of Biden, Durham report worse than Watergate, won't endorse in Texas AG race

Biden giving Putin the green light to continue building their pipeline while he shut down our Keystone pipeline is all you need to know on his plan to negotiate with Russia. also, i wish Cruz would endorse Louie Gohmert for TX AG

www.usmessageboard.com

Durham Issues Subpeonas to Hillary Clinton's Law Firm and the Tech Bros Who Fabricated the Alfa Bank Hoax

BREAKING: Special Counsel John Durham issued a new set of subpoenas, including to a law firm with close ties to Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign. CNN tries to spin it, but there’s not enough lipstick for the pig. Lawyers hiding their clients and passing off hoax crimes to the FBI to trick them...

www.usmessageboard.com

If Biden fires Durham, he MUST be impeached

The Durham investigation into the tampering with the 2016 election by the Obama/Biden administration is threatened by the Biden firing of all U.S. Attorneys. Unlike the last legitimate President, Donald Trump, the Biden regime is clear cutting the justice department to ensure that there is...

www.usmessageboard.com

Durham May Be Waiting For Godot

Perhaps we can take it as enough that Durham has spotlit the truth, the charges against Hillary and the Democrat Party, exposing the lies about Trump that they orchestrated. But it would be nice if the trial of Sussman, her lawyer, were on the up and up. It won't be because Hillary's...

www.usmessageboard.com

FBI Agents that raided Mar-a- Lago are under investigation by John Durham.

Now it all makes sense. These same corrupt Feds were part of the Russia Hoax and Spy Gate. https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/paul-sperry-fbi-agents-who-raided-trump-under-criminal-investigation-by-john-durham/

www.usmessageboard.com

*Durham Kicks Off Motions To Bring Down The Hildabeast*

Sorry bout that, 1. And so it begins. 2. And I am hoping that he gets his gal, pig, whatever! 3. READ: https://www.theblaze.com/news/-2657206198 "Special counsel John Durham has issued trial subpoenas for members of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National...

www.usmessageboard.com

Did Durham Read "Last Of The Mohicans"????

1. In Durham's indictment we find validation of everything the Right said from the start about Hillary and the Democrat's forming an alliance with the Kremlin to sink the campaign of the man they both feared, Trump. They lied about Trump, then spent years punishing him for their evil. 2...

www.usmessageboard.com

Durham Slaps Down Lying Right Wing Propagandists

All the usual propagandists have been spreading a bald-faced lie that Michael Sussman spied on Trump's White House. This lie has spread so far and wide and has been parroted so broadly by the rube herd which does not have the intellectual bandwidth to read the Durham indictment for themselves...

www.usmessageboard.com

It's official: Durham is investigating the Clinton Campaign.

This is interesting. Not that anything will NECESSARILY come out of the investigation....JUST LIKE THE MUELLER REPORT...but it is interesting where the evidence led Durham. The latest filings by Special Counsel John Durham reveal that lawyers for the Hillary Clinton Campaign now represent...

www.usmessageboard.com

SPERRY: FBI Agents Involved in Trump Raid are Under Criminal Investigation by Durham For Abusing Their Power in Trump-Russia Probe

But if a tree falls in the forest... https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/08/sperry-fbi-agents-involved-trump-raid-criminal-investigation-durham-abusing-power-trump-russia-probe/

www.usmessageboard.com

The latest Durham indictment is a big one

By Andrea Widburg The Democrats' nefarious Russia hoax, which sucked time, life, and political capital out of the Trump presidency, is really getting exposed. With the arrest of Igor Danchenko and the release of the indictment behind the arrest, we're finally getting a chance to see that the...

www.usmessageboard.com

Tulsi weighs in on the Durham probe, rips the MSM.

"A Russian asset." ,according to Hillary Clinton, if you'll recall.

www.usmessageboard.com

Former DNI Ratcliffe weighs in on the latest Durham indictments.

The mainstream media is trying to ignore it, but you can't hold back the truth forever. This is beyond politics and more about upholding the Constitution and our civil liberties. If the Obama administration used the awesome power of our intelligence agencies and spied on the president, they can...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Chillicothe]

From an analysis in this morning's Washington Post:

"Barr seems to have legitimately thought that Trump was unfairly targeted in 2016. He probably still does. He put Durham in place to prove the case. Durham didn’t. But Durham did accomplish one thing that is very important to Trump: He generated a lot of things that could become Fox News headlines in which anecdotes became indictments of the system.
In that sense, Durham was very successful indeed."

 

[Lesh]

What about Kevin Clinesmith? Have you forgotten about him?

The Justice Department signed off on a FISA warrant to spy on the Trump campaign before the FBI misconduct surrounding that application was discovered. The FISA warrant was based on a misleading FISA application, doctored by former FBI lawyer Kevin Clinesmith. John Durham charged Clinesmith with making a false statement – the first criminal case arising out of his investigation. Clinesmith pleaded guilty. The Justice Department's inspector general revealed that the unverified anti-Trump dossier helped serve as the basis for other warrants obtained.

The dossier was commissioned by Fusion GPS. It contained false allegations of purported coordination between Trump and the Russian government. The Clinton campaign and the DNC funded the dossier through the law firm Perkins Coie. The Justice Department admitted in 2020 that the FISA warrants, when stripped of the FBI's misinformation, did not meet the necessary legal threshold and never should have been issued.

Sounds to me this is just nipping at the edge of the iceberg and there is far more yet to discover! The United States spent over 30 million dollars and two years chasing down a case as a result of these lies that did not even exist. There never was any Russia Russia Russia. It was all a big lie funded by the Clintons and the DNC to undermine the President of the United States.

Clinesmith added one line that he believed to be true in the THIRD warrant issued on Carter Page.

Nuthingburger

 

[Aldo Raine]

The devil wins again.

Nope, he got voted out November 3rd 2020.
MAGA

 

[Dragonlady]

You might try two of my favorites - the WSJ and The Hill, both considered centrist.

AllSides Media Bias Chart

The AllSides Media Bias Chart is an easy way for you to identify political bias in the news so you can be better equipped to navigate our increasingly polarized media landscape.

www.allsides.com

The WSJ is the best of the right wing sources even if it is owned by Rupert Murdoch and cannot be trusted at all on climate change. But it's focus was always on business and less on politics before Murdoch bought it. The Hill has promoted some notions via editorials that simply weren't true, but only the Hill is "centrist". The WSJ has always had a right bias. Both do subscribed to journalistic standards which is more than can be said for most right wing media sources.

I like WAPO. They're the best newspaper in the world, bar none. I also like BBC News, and any of the Canadian networks, but especially CTV and Global national news reports. I read the Globe and Mail (Toronto newspaper). Their Business Section was required reading when I was a banker. They're the Canadian equivalent of the WSJ.

But I much prefer international media to American reporting which tends to be so US centric and partisan, that it overlooks the big picture, both nationally and globally. Overturning Roe v Wade is a good example of this failure. For 50 years, the right was so focussed on overturning Roe v. Wade, restricting and banning abortion, that when they succeeded, they gleefully banned all abortions in any state where they had complete control with no consideration of what would really happen if they did it.

Now Republican lawmakers in these states are having serious buyer's remorse on the laws they've passed and candidates are busy scrubbing their websites of their extreme anti-abotion rhetoric, and making speeches that denying their wives, sisters, and daughters of necessary medical care during pregnancy and childbirth was not what they had in mind. Forcing pre-teen girls to bear the children of their rapists, was not what these lawmakers had in mind. Sending women having miscarriages home to bleed out was not what they had in mind.

 

[berg80]

Looks like it's over with nothing to prove.

That's it. Nothing to see here.

"The Durham probe into the federal government's investigation of the 2016 Trump campaign's contacts with Russian agents is ending with a whimper"

"The New York Times reports that the grand jury convened by prosecutor John Durham to hear evidence has expired, and sources tell the paper that there are no plans to convene another"

"Durham and his attorneys are preparing a final report into their inquiry, which lost the only case that it brought to trial when former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann was acquitted on charges of lying to the FBI"

John Durham ends “deep state” probe with a whimper: report

Durham's three-year inquiry ending after failing to bring charges against any high-level official.

www.salon.com

The frustration with Durham's epic failure to make good on the wet dream of Trump, Billy the Bagman, and The Following is palpable. It was a double nothingburger with special sauce capped off by the acquittal of Sussmann. What a face plant.

 

[Godboy]

Looks like it's over with nothing to prove.

That's it. Nothing to see here.

"The Durham probe into the federal government's investigation of the 2016 Trump campaign's contacts with Russian agents is ending with a whimper"

"The New York Times reports that the grand jury convened by prosecutor John Durham to hear evidence has expired, and sources tell the paper that there are no plans to convene another"

"Durham and his attorneys are preparing a final report into their inquiry, which lost the only case that it brought to trial when former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann was acquitted on charges of lying to the FBI"

John Durham ends “deep state” probe with a whimper: report

Durham's three-year inquiry ending after failing to bring charges against any high-level official.

www.salon.com

The DOJ, which is ruled with an iron fist by democrats, refused to prosecute anyone for this crime against President Trump? What a SHOCKER!

 

[berg80]

refused to prosecute anyone for this crime against President Trump?

Refused to prosecute? How about failed to find evidence of a crime. Durham was empowered to enjoin a grand jury and indict as he did with Sussmann. He found nothing.

 

[Godboy]

Refused to prosecute? How about failed to find evidence of a crime. Durham was empowered to enjoin a grand jury and indict as he did with Sussmann. He found nothing.

Riiiight, like there is no evidence of Hunters numerous crimes either.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Why did Hillary’s attorney lie to the FBI?

 

[toobfreak]

Clinesmith added one line that he believed to be true

He has ADMITTED to falsifying documents making the whole Russia thing a fraud, like you.

 

[ColonelAngus]

The lawyer for the Hillary campaign lied to the FBI. WHY?

 

[Lesh]

He has ADMITTED to falsifying documents making the whole Russia thing a fraud, like you.

Hardly. It was the third FISA warrant issue on Carter and it was issued a year after the Russia investigation began.

Huge fail on your part

 

[Lesh]

The lawyer for the Hillary campaign lied to the FBI. WHY?

He was found not guilty of that.

Another fail

 

[toobfreak]

Huge fail on your part

Huge fail on your part. None of that changes the fact that Hillary and the DNC funded a fraud dossier trying to interfere with and throw a presidential election and administration, stoop.

 

[bodecea]

Looks like it's over with nothing to prove.

That's it. Nothing to see here.

"The Durham probe into the federal government's investigation of the 2016 Trump campaign's contacts with Russian agents is ending with a whimper"

"The New York Times reports that the grand jury convened by prosecutor John Durham to hear evidence has expired, and sources tell the paper that there are no plans to convene another"

"Durham and his attorneys are preparing a final report into their inquiry, which lost the only case that it brought to trial when former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann was acquitted on charges of lying to the FBI"

John Durham ends “deep state” probe with a whimper: report

Durham's three-year inquiry ending after failing to bring charges against any high-level official.

www.salon.com

But we were promised con-victions.

 

[bodecea]

You get your news from Salon and the NYT?

The FBI’s corruption is well known by this point, and nobody but delusional leftists trust them.

"The FBI's corruption is well known...." only to the orange koolaid drinking MAGAt-cult.

 

[bodecea]

Huge fail on your part. None of that changes the fact that Hillary and the DNC funded a fraud dossier trying to interfere with and throw a presidential election and administration, stoop.

So...Durham was your great hope....what happened?

 

[Lesh]

So...Durham was your great hope....what happened?

Nothing…

 

[Indeependent]

So...Durham was your great hope....what happened?

The potential of 2 bullets in the back of the head.