Again, thoroughly investigated and no evidence of partisan bias was identified.
One warrant to the FISA court was found to contain a false statement and was prosecuted.
That’s it.
The FISA Courts knew different:
WashingtonCNN —
The typically ultra-close-lipped Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court slammed the FBI for mistakes it made in the Carter Page surveillance warrants and ordered the agency to detail how it will improve its warrant applications in light of the errors, uncovered recently by the Justice Department’s inspector general.
“The FBI’s handling of the Carter Page applications, as portrayed in the [Office of the inspector general] report, was antithetical to the heightened duty of candor described above. The frequency with which representations made by FBI personnel turned out to be unsupported or contradicted by information in their possession, and with which they withheld information detrimental to their case, calls into question whether information contained in other FBI applications is reliable,” federal Judge Rosemary Collyer wrote in an order from the court published Tuesday.
You are aware of what the word "frequency" means, and what the "s" on the end of the words "applications" and "mistakes" mean?
Hell, Durham maliciously prosecuted two innocent people out of partisan bias but that was just fine.
Again, no facts. Who are these innocents, and why do you not name them when you make the accusation?
The fact is the FBI did far more to hurt Clinton than to hurt Trump in tue 2016 election.
You're right about that one, Miss Stopped Clock.
The FBI's training and body of knowledge is about fighting crime and gathering intelligence. Their operations in the arena of partisan politics and election rigging were the work of amateurs. They should have left that to the CIA, who have experience rigging foreign elections for decades.
All they did was prove Trump's point about elections being rigged against an "outsider," and galvanize Trump's base. If the FBI did not want people to think they were partisan hacks who put a cinder block on the scale of the 2016 election, they should have delayed their so-called "investigations" until the elections were over.
James Comey damanged Hillary greatly, which was a key factor in Trump winning, IMO. But he was much more famewhore than partisan. Of
course he announced that he would not prosecute Clinton and then proceded to list all the crimes of which she was guilty, in violation of FBI norms and basic fairness. Of
course he announced the reopening of the investigation 11 days before election day. He would have strangled his own mother at a press conference if it would have gotten him thirty more seconds of air time.
The kept the investigation into the Trump campaign secret but had no problems publicizing the investigation into Clinton. That discrepancy alone should tell you that your narrative has some serious holes.
Again, I blame Comey for that one. But how can you keep arguing that the FBI was the gold standard of investigative fairness and non-partisanship?
