oh no. I understand perfectly. You are an idiot that makes wild ass claims without a whit of supporting fact and then demands that you are correct.
When you have something more than accusations I might (MIGHT) bother to take you seriously but right now you are talking out of your ass
HAHA. You saying the judge did NOT take a bribe??? Then the burden of proof is on you to support your preposterous claim.
I stated the obvious and don't have to prove a thing.
You are the one accusing, it is on you to prove he did wrong. You have no proof either way.
That's how crazies work. They make claims then when challenged they challenge the challengers to provide proof.