Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
www.belfastlive.co.uk
I like your hitler mustacheJolene Bunting could face jail over harassment of Belfast drag queen
Judge warns “I do consider these breaches to be serious, and I want some time to reflect to see whether or not we are in the realms, very unusually in these courts, of a custodial sentence"
Hate speech has consequences and the victim has suffered enough. These extremists are in dream land if they think they have the right to do this.
You twits don’t have a First Amendment.Jolene Bunting could face jail over harassment of Belfast drag queen
Judge warns “I do consider these breaches to be serious, and I want some time to reflect to see whether or not we are in the realms, very unusually in these courts, of a custodial sentence"
Hate speech has consequences and the victim has suffered enough. These extremists are in dream land if they think they have the right to do this.
You twits don’t have a First Amendment.
The closest analog in the United States would be a civil suit for alleged defamation followed by an injunction (here perhaps a prior restraint and thus not even permissible) followed by some penalty for a contempt of court. Jail wouldn’t be an option.
But I recognize that you’re not merely a twit Brit. You’re also a libtard and don’t much care for free speech.
There are some circumstances where a contempt can lead to a particular kind of incarceration. The point of jailing a civil contemner is literally coercion. “Oh. You’re subpoenaed to testify but you refuse to be sworn in? Fine. Go sit in a jail cell until you comply.”Sounds like this is what she is really facing jail for---contempt of court--which can happen in the US too.
You twits don’t have a First Amendment.
The closest analog in the United States would be a civil suit for alleged defamation followed by an injunction (here perhaps a prior restraint and thus not even permissible) followed by some penalty for a contempt of court. Jail wouldn’t be an option.
But I recognize that you’re not merely a twit Brit. You’re also a libtard and don’t much care for free speech.
That is pretty much it. She had an injunction from the court to immediately take away a video she posted which untruthfully presented the Drag queen actor.Sounds like this is what she is really facing jail for---contempt of court--which can happen in the US too.
Jolene Bunting is to be sentenced later this month after she accepted breaching the order to immediately remove a video about Belfast actor Matthew Cavan from social media platforms.
Mr Cavan told a court he has lost work, been wrongly accused of grooming children, and pursued by paedophile hunters because of the postings.
www.belfastlive.co.uk
There are some circumstances where a contempt can lead to a particular kind of incarceration. The point of jailing a civil contemner is literally coercion. “Oh. You’re subpoenaed to testify but you refuse to be sworn in? Fine. Go sit in a jail cell until you comply.”
But this case is screwy from jump street.
Here is what the fucking drag queen was “performing”: Belfast drag queen receives 'incredible support' following online threats | ITV News
This was (is) a drag show for kids. Why the fuck is a drag show being aimed at children?
Nor did I say it does. But that also wasn’t the prior restraint ordered in that British case. Instead this judge ordered a person to take down a post with video. Opinion. They call it “hate” speech.First Amendment doesn't protect violating court orders to leave people the fuck alone.
There are some circumstances where a contempt can lead to a particular kind of incarceration. The point of jailing a civil contemner is literally coercion. “Oh. You’re subpoenaed to testify but you refuse to be sworn in? Fine. Go sit in a jail cell until you comply.”
But this case is screwy from jump street.
Here is what the fucking drag queen was “performing”: Belfast drag queen receives 'incredible support' following online threats | ITV News
This was (is) a drag show for kids. Why the fuck is a drag show being aimed at children?
No, you bombastic retard. It’s not aimed at adults at all. It’s aimed at kids. The question, you fucking imbecile, is what is it supposedly designed to help children “learn?”
Nor did I say it does. But that also wasn’t the prior restraint ordered in that British case. Instead this judge ordered a person to take down a post with video. Opinion. They call it “hate” speech.
I have a hunch they would label my reply as “hate speech,” too. But:
what the fuck is a gay actor doing a drag show for and aimed at children for? I think the show itself is actually bordering on pedophile behavior. Oh, and I do hate pedo’s.
You “realize” nothing, you scumbag libtard fart sucker.Tolerance of people who are different, which I realize is a concept that is totally foreign to you, ya fuggin fuck-knuckle.
I think that you are being a bit OTT. As a result of her harrassment he has lost work and been hounded by vigilante groups.You twits don’t have a First Amendment.
The closest analog in the United States would be a civil suit for alleged defamation followed by an injunction (here perhaps a prior restraint and thus not even permissible) followed by some penalty for a contempt of court. Jail wouldn’t be an option.
But I recognize that you’re not merely a twit Brit. You’re also a libtard and don’t much care for free speech.
And to think i thought Drag Queens were faggotry extremists who want to diddle with young children. I guess it is okay to do that, but if you are opposed to DQ, then you must be arrested. Now of course this happens in Britstain, but try DQing over in the middle east....Jolene Bunting could face jail over harassment of Belfast drag queen
Judge warns “I do consider these breaches to be serious, and I want some time to reflect to see whether or not we are in the realms, very unusually in these courts, of a custodial sentence"
Hate speech has consequences and the victim has suffered enough. These extremists are in dream land if they think they have the right to do this.
You “realize” nothing, you scumbag libtard fart sucker.
We shouldn’t “tolerate” people. Who the fuck are you to “allow” people to be different? You typical faux liberal.
No. “Tolerance” is the wrong concept.
And the word you’re groping for doesn’t even apply to drag shows for kids.
You sure are a presumptuous little brain dead libtard. And I am guessing your visits here are from some foreign land. You seem like a good partner for taint.You don't give a toss one way or the other; you're just virtue signaling, looking for a way to boost your pathetically impotent testosterone levels I reckon.
Pedos aren't drag queens or gays -- that's what your cartoonish brainwashed worldview thinks. In reality child molesters are people that everyone trusts, who then abuse that trust in order to get closer to their victims.
Was Jerry Sandusky a drag queen?
Were all those Catholic priests parading around in women's dresses?
What about Josh Duggar - does he do drag?
Of course not. Pedos aren't drag queens or flamboyantly gay. They're priests, teachers, police officers, neighborhood babysitters, guidance counselors, doctors, lawyers, judges...people that are generally trusted and respected in society. And of course they could be janitors and garbage truck drivers who abuse their family members, too. Point being, you're just engaging in stupid-as-pigshit tropes.
Seriously, stop being such an insufferable, bigoted dipshit.
