Don’t Call It Climate Change. Red States Prepare For ‘Extreme Weather’

But is it?
You are missing the point.
The problem with the alarmist is they have been crying wolf for 70 years. The earth should have ended like 5 times by now.
Even the most recent claims, with all of the modern technology and knowledge - NONE have come true.
That is the problem. You can't blame people for raising their eyebrows over yet - another claim.
There are many environmental problems today. MANY. Most are not "climate change" related. Most are diminishing resources, pollution and misplaced resources. If we concentrated on the real issues that are right in our face - we would solve everything else.
We are getting progressively worse
Climate change is happening and we are making it worse
Arguing about the rate of change does not help

We need to take action
 
They are not “adapting” in Africa
They are starving
if only we could do some sort of fundraiser to help the hungry in Africa…oh wait we did, in the 80s…it was called Live Aid, they were starving then too…that was before “climate change” though

point is they are always starving there…in one of the most fruitful places on the planet. Why? largely due to lack of capitalism
 
We are getting progressively worse
Climate change is happening and we are making it worse
Arguing about the rate of change does not help

We need to take action
That is not realistic.
What action? Exactly.
Build 5,000 Nuclear Power plants?
Build 1,500 sq. mile solar arrays?
EV cars? Haha... yeah.. no... that would be an environmental holocaust.

I am all for better energy technology. 100%. But neither side of the government is the least bit interested. Both - BOTH - are in the pockets of the investor class who want things to stay just as they are. The "Green initiative" - laughably inadequate and filled to the brim of padding pockets.
We will never replace them either. Because they have us so divided we would never vote for change.
 
if only we could do some sort of fundraiser to help the hungry in Africa…oh wait we did, in the 80s…it was called Live Aid, they were starving then too…that was before “climate change” though

point is they are always starving there…in one of the most fruitful places on the planet. Why? largely due to lack of capitalism
Guess what?

Things can get significantly worse in a drought
No reason for you to celebrate
 
That is not why it was changed. It was changed because of the morons who would go "look, it is snowing, that means the globe is not warming" about 1000 times a year.
Lie. It was changed when your precious “scientists” and “experts” got caught lying about the data. Changing numbers to get their desired result.
 
Just more crap from the resident troll Dana. One would think eventually these leftards would wake up and realize that man can not control nature (read: the weather). These things have gone on forever and will always go on. No matter what anybody does.
 
I’m gonna continue to use this Sowell quote where it fits. In this case, it applies perfectly to the retarded baboon OP…

“It is usually futile to try to talk facts and analysis to people who are enjoying a sense of moral superiority in their ignorance.”
 
A perfect illustration. Might as well scream to the world that you are abjectly ignorant of any of this and proud of it.

"Heehaw, I don't go to scientists for science news, I ask like-minded dumbasses on anonymous message boards."

Leaning on the "science" eh........ Stuck on stupid and decades worth of study!!!!!


1638134681718.png
 
That is not what science says. Show me his published science. That's what science is.

wait... he doesn't have any? he has no experience or education in climatology whatsoever?

Huh, what a bizarre post by you. It's as if you had to go find someone with no actual published science, in order to find a contrarian, and then present his unevidenced opinion as 'what all the science actually says". But that would be pretty stupid, dishonest, and anti-intellectual. Surely you are better than that. ;)
/——-/ And yet you didn’t refute his article. Funny dat.
 
if only we could do some sort of fundraiser to help the hungry in Africa…oh wait we did, in the 80s…it was called Live Aid, they were starving then too…that was before “climate change” though

point is they are always starving there…in one of the most fruitful places on the planet. Why? largely due to lack of capitalism
No, largely due to complete incompetence and lack of civilization.
 
"Red States Prepare for "Extreme Weather'" ----------------------

I think that probably just means "winter."
 
Guess what?

Things can get significantly worse in a drought
No reason for you to celebrate
They live for the day and not to prepare for bad times. Modern technology has been used but for many more there is resistance. Its a Village thing. Hillary knows.
 
It's so stupid that people care about what it's called.

The planet has been warming for a long time.

It's now to the point that it is causing weather patterns that cause a lot of death and destruction.

It's now to the point that clean water is an issue here in the United States.

It's now to the point that whole forests are being burned to the ground from wildfires. Destroying the towns and way of life in those forests.

Killing people and livestock. Destroying businesses.

We could have taken steps to prevent this or at least make the damage not as bad.

Unfortunately, money was, and still is, more important.
Actually we have been in an ice age for the last 2.7 million years. The planet is cooling. Atmospheric CO2 is not going to reverse that. As for people and livestock being killed, the effect of a glacial cycle is much much worse than any that would happen from a 2C increase in temperature. All of Canada, the US NE, parts of the midwest and NW US, parts of Asia and parts of Europe will be under 2 miles of ice. In all 250 million people will be displaced while the land they are displaced from will be wiped clean by glaciers.

1638135605298.png
 
You right wingers are arguing the wrong point.

The point you are arguing now has already been settled.

You just happen to disagree.

Yet it's the politicians you support, voted for and will continue to vote for who are taking steps to combat global warming.

They just repackaged and renamed it.

So now you can support combating "extreme weather."

Or not.

Yet you will continue to support and vote for the politicians who you disagree with on this issue.
 

Forum List

Back
Top