Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 62,401
- 45,381
- 3,565
Yes, its a photograph which is easily alteredIt's a photograph, ya dumbshit. There's nothing about it to show the photographs were digitally altered.Its just a digital imageRegardless of your bias, all factchecker did, other than examine it, was to publish photos of it. There is absolutely nothing fake about it.Fact checker is a pro obama cabalHe let factchecker examine it and post photographs of it. And you'll be happy to note that it was investigated by forgery experts and deemed authentic....My position is that a digital copy released on the internet is not trustworthy
what is needed is to allow forgery experts to examine the original documents
otherwise there is no conclusive proof
but since that did not happen while obama was in office the best I can be is an obama agnostic
I cant say he was or wasnt
Democrat sues Sen. Obama over 'fraudulent candidacy'
However, FactChecker.org says it obtained Obama's actual certification of live birth and that the document was indeed real. The site discredited some of the claims of Internet bloggers, such as that the certificate as viewed in a scanned copy released by Obama's campaign lacked a raised seal. FactChecker.org also established that many of the alleged flaws in the document noted by bloggers were caused by the scanning of the document.
A separate WND investigation into Obama's certification of live birth utilizing forgery experts also found the document to be authentic. The investigation also revealed methods used by some of the bloggers to determine the document was fake involved forgeries, in that a few bloggers added text and images to the certificate scan that weren't originally there.
Not to mention, but I will anyway... the link I posted was to WND, a far rightwing website. They too had a forgery expert state it is authentic.
You conspiracy nuts are ... nuts.
Which is meaningless
Plus, it was deemed authentic by a leftwing site.
It was deemed authentic by a rightwing site.
It was certified by the state of Hawaii's state registrar.
It was authenticated independently by two of Hawaii's Directors of Health.
You've literally got nothing to dispense of it other than repeating hollow denials of "nuh-uh," which follow your lies that he didn't even release it until 2011.