That's a lie!
So are you.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That's a lie!
Calling it genocide is hyperbole. Let's just say that diversity means lowering objective standards for excellence for Negroes. If the job required intelligence, few Negroes will merit employment, because they have low average IQ's.Diversity is code for White genocide.
He didn't mean that.So he's going to eliminate people who aren't white then?
Kamala Harris was a bad choice. She has always been unpopular. I never forgave her for criticizing Biden in a primary debate for opposing forced school busing.How do you know they aren't the best qualified individuals?
The object of diversity is to replace White people with non-Whites, by any means necessary.Calling it genocide is hyperbole. Let's just say that diversity means lowering objective standards for excellence for Negroes. If the job required intelligence, few Negroes will merit employment, because they have low average IQ's.
Wrong. People were much better off. The world was much better off. Reality is out there try and find it.Actually. Trump was and is. But I’ve posted that before.
Maybe Trump doesn't know these people are US citizens?
The object of diversity is to replace White people with non-Whites, by any means necessary.
Wrong. Ever notice that demands for more diversity are never targeted at places with majority non-White populations? Nobody ever says that the ghetto needs to diversify by having more Whites move there. Indeed, when Whites do move into black areas it's called gentrification and is roundly condemned by the people who say we need more diversity. No one ever says that the barrios are too Hispanic and could use more White people to make them more diverse. Nobody ever laments that Chinatown is too Chinese and could benefit from White people moving in. South America isn't considered too Hispanic. Africa isn't considered too brown. Asia isn't considered too Asians. When Whites move to those places it's condemned as colonization. When non-Whites flood into majority White countries it's not called colonization or an invasion. No, it's called increasing diversity. Our greatest strength, apparently. Liberals won't be happy until the last White woman is strangled with the entrails of the last White man.The object of diversity is for all people to work together to build a great nation, regardless of their race, religion, sex, or sexual preference. When the white people spend all of their time and energies keeping "others in their place", nobody is able to "get ahead".
Your hero Lincoln actually came up with that idea.So he's going to eliminate people who aren't white then?
He was right too.Your hero Lincoln actually came up with that idea.
The also owned slaves, retard.
Wrong. Ever notice that demands for more diversity are never targeted at places with majority non-White populations? Nobody ever says that the ghetto needs to diversify by having more Whites move there. Indeed, when Whites do move into black areas it's called gentrification and is roundly condemned by the people who say we need more diversity. No one ever says that the barrios are too Hispanic and could use more White people to make them more diverse. Nobody ever laments that Chinatown is too Chinese and could benefit from White people moving in. South America isn't considered too Hispanic. Africa isn't considered too brown. Asia isn't considered too Asians. When Whites move to those places it's condemned as colonization. When non-Whites flood into majority White countries it's not called colonization or an invasion. No, it's called increasing diversity. Our greatest strength, apparently. Liberals won't be happy until the last White woman is strangled with the entrails of the last White man.
You have white confused with globalist. And what you are saying is racist. Take a time out.The object of diversity is for all people to work together to build a great nation, regardless of their race, religion, sex, or sexual preference. When the white people spend all of their time and energies keeping "others in their place", nobody is able to "get ahead".
Your hero Lincoln actually came up with that idea.
Lincoln was correct as is now so readily apparentFor frigidweirdo
---Since the early 1850s, Lincoln had been advancing colonization as a remedy for the gradual emancipation of the nation’s enslaved. While he strongly opposed the institution of slavery, he didn’t believe in racial equality, or that people of different races could successfully integrate. And unleashing nearly 4 million Black people into white American society—North or South—was a political nonstarter. So despite the fact that most Black Americans in the 1850s had been born on U.S. soil, Lincoln advocated shipping them to Central America, the Caribbean or “back” to Africa.---
When Abraham Lincoln Tried to Resettle Free Black Americans in the Caribbean | HISTORY
Lincoln wanted to end slavery—but wasn’t keen on integrating African Americans into US society. His first attempt to send them offshore proved disastrous.www.history.com
For frigidweirdo
---Since the early 1850s, Lincoln had been advancing colonization as a remedy for the gradual emancipation of the nation’s enslaved. While he strongly opposed the institution of slavery, he didn’t believe in racial equality, or that people of different races could successfully integrate. And unleashing nearly 4 million Black people into white American society—North or South—was a political nonstarter. So despite the fact that most Black Americans in the 1850s had been born on U.S. soil, Lincoln advocated shipping them to Central America, the Caribbean or “back” to Africa.---
When Abraham Lincoln Tried to Resettle Free Black Americans in the Caribbean | HISTORY
Lincoln wanted to end slavery—but wasn’t keen on integrating African Americans into US society. His first attempt to send them offshore proved disastrous.www.history.com