Does the USA need NATO?

[zaangalewa]

Slavs are a linguistic community. Slavs by origin are only those who descended from the Huns: ...

Your "concept" of history is really a torture.

 

[rupol2000]

the other side of the problem

There's only one problem. There are peoples that are destroyed as a unity, there are peoples that are completely destroyed physically, there are peoples that are being destroyed by the imperialists right now, before our eyes, such as the Uighurs in China. The people have their own spirit, their own body, killing a people is no less a crime than killing a person.

 

[rupol2000]

Your "concept" of history is really a torture.

It's just your ignorance. Slavism in science is understood as a linguistic community and nothing else.

 

[zaangalewa]

Hatred of enemies and conquerors is normal, but it is now "not accepted"

Stalin for example displaced and murdered how many million Russians and others with what kind of methods?

 

[rupol2000]

Stalin for example displaced and murdered how many million Russians and others with what kind of methods?

He is a good student of Bismarck, you must be delighted with his methods.

 

[zaangalewa]

It's just your ignorance.

No. It is your absolute stupidity which is unbearable. The Huns - today called Hungarians - speak a Finno-uiguric language. The Russians speak an Indo-Germanic language. We spoke about this - but you "forget" everythgin what I said to you before it reached your ears over you eyes. You speak a lot - but nearly everything what you say about history is stupid nonsense.

 

[zaangalewa]

He is a good student of Bismarck,

Bismark? What for heavens sake has Bismark to do with this mass-murderer? The Brit Willilam II had been a criminal - but not so Bismark. And even the mad man William II had been harmless compared with the devilish mass-murderer Stalin.

you must be delighted with his methods.

 

[rupol2000]

zaangalewa

No. It is your absolute stupidity which is unbearable. The Huns - today called Hungarians - speak a Finno-uiguric language. The Russians speak an Indo-Germanic language. We spoke about this - but you "forget" everythgin what I said to you before it reached your ears over you eyes. You speak a lot - but nearly everything what you say about history is stupid nonsense.

Huns is the common name for Horsemen. The Slavic language is Old Bulgarian, there is no doubt that it was spoken by Poles, Old Bulgars, Avars and Khazars. I call them Huns. You can call them Aryans if it's more convenient for you.

 

[rupol2000]

Bismark? What for heavens sake has Bismark to do with this mass-murderer? The Brit Willilam II had benme a criminal - but nit so Bismark. And even the mad man William II had been harmless compared with the devilish mass-murderer Stalin.

Pan-Germanists, National Socialists and Bolsheviks pursued the same imperial policy as Bismarck. The Bolsheviks themselves essentially come from the same places as Bismarck. All the genocides of the Bolsheviks concerned mainly the steppe peoples, the Volga region, Kazakhstan, the Don region and Ukraine. These are the most fertile lands. There were no Glodomors in the northwest, in the Baltic States and in Belarus. It was not a civil war, but the conquest and destruction of peoples.

 

[zaangalewa]

zaangalewa

Huns is the common name for Horsemen.

Idiotic!

The Slavic language is Old Bulgarian,

The orrgrin of the Slawic language is in the Ukraine not far from the Russian border. It's a very young language. From the 5th century exist the first reports as far as I know in the moment.

there is no doubt that it was spoken by Poles, Old Bulgars, Avars

Absolutelly no one has any idea about what kind of language the Avars had spoken. The reports about them say that they had been Europeans and/or Mongols (and other stories). Perhaps they had been blond eyed Turks or somehting like this - or not - Who knows?

and Khazars. I call them Huns.

But not so the Hungarians because their famous king Attila had his center there in a city not far from the Serbian border in Hun-garia?

You can call them Aryans

Aryans never had existed! They are an artifical construct! But if they had really existed then they had been ancestors of the Persians!

if it's more convenient for you.

Idiot!

 

[rupol2000]

today called Hungarians

The Hungarians come from approximately the same people as the Uighurs, they have identical ethnonyms, in Asia these peoples were called the Dzungars, as well as the Ugrs. They have nothing to do with the Finns, neither in the sense of the Venets nor in the sense of the Saami. This is a historical fake. I don't know where their language came from, but their script is runic and their heraldry is identical to the palette of the US flag, their cowboys are identical to US cowboys, and the Austro-Hungarian political order is identical to that of the USA.

 

[rupol2000]

The orrgrin of the Slawoc language is in the Ukraine not far from Russia.

Danube region, the region of the Tisza river. Yes, it was in Ukraine too. Ukraine itself was part of Avaria and Bulgaria. Its name comes from Ugry. Yes, Ukrainian and Polish are the closest to Avar, and they even retained the Aryan melodiousness.
Most Ukrainian folk songs do not mention the Dnieper but the Danube

 

[zaangalewa]

Pan-Germanists, National Socialists and Bolsheviks pursued the same imperial policy as Bismarck.

I-d-i-o-t-i-c !!!

The Bolsheviks themselves essentially come from the same places as Bismarck. All the genocides of the Bolsheviks concerned mainly the steppe peoples, the Volga region, Kazakhstan, the Don region and Ukraine. These are the most fertile lands. There were no Glodomors in the northwest, in the Baltic States and in Belarus. It was not a civil war, but the conquest and destruction of peoples.

 

[rupol2000]

Ukrainian and Polish are the most melodic languages, they are ideal for songs.
The Aryan languages were musically accented. The Vedic language was the height of linguistic perfection, Vedic hymns, the most expressive songs of the ancient world and perhaps the most ancient songs that ever existed on earth were written.
I think there is a connection here.

 

[zaangalewa]

Danube region, the region of the Tisza river. Yes, it was in Ukraine too.

So Bulgaria is in the Ukriane. Good to know.

Ukraine itself was part of Avaria and Bulgaria. Its name comes from Ugry. Yes, Ukrainian and Polish are the closest to Avar, and they even retained the Aryan melodiousness.
Most Ukrainian folk songs do not mention the Dnieper but the Danube

And the Danube (=Dnieper) flows through the Russian provinces Germania superior, Rhaetia, Norica, Pannonia, Dalmatia, Dacia, Moesia and Thracia?

 

[rupol2000]

So Bulgaria is in the Ukriane. Good to know.

Do not pretend to be a fool Ukrain within these boundaries appeared in 1917

 

[rupol2000]

And the Danube (=Dnieper)

what?

 

[rupol2000]

zaangalewa The fact of the matter is that the Danube does not flow in Ukraine, and most of the songs are about the Danube.

 

[zaangalewa]

Ukrainian and Polish are the most melodic languages, they are ideal for songs.

Not in the ears of a German. We prefer English, French and Spain.

The Aryan languages were musically accented.

If this hypothetic construct exists. Btw what language spoke Dracula? And did he sing?

The Vedic language was the height of linguistic perfection, Vedic hymns, the most expressive songs of the ancient world and perhaps the most ancient songs that ever existed on earth were written.
I think there is a connection here.

Vedic? India? You love Bollywood?

 

[rupol2000]

zaangalewa
This is the legacy of the Proto-Slavic community of Avaria, which included Poles, Ukrainians, Avars, Khazars and Bulgars
From Bavaria to Don