bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,419
- 2,180
We assumed they already had it. You've proven nothing. If you double the size of the economy, then everything doubles.The same place the first 1000 people got it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We assumed they already had it. You've proven nothing. If you double the size of the economy, then everything doubles.The same place the first 1000 people got it.
Anybody?
We assumed they already had it. You've proven nothing. If you double the size of the economy, then everything doubles.
www.usmessageboard.com
It's just plain false.It sounds counterintuitive, much like burning wood to reduce global warming.
The economy has a mind of its own, and educates economists about the economy, not the other way around. It's like a bar of soap that keeps slipping out of their grasp.It's just plain false.
Economists have argued these issues ad nauseum.
So you believe there are no laws of economics?The economy has a mind of its own, and educates economists about the economy, not the other way around.
Of course, but we've largely disregarded them. Some people can borrow their way to prosperity, but most cannot.So you believe there are no laws of economics?
Borrowing is not necessarily the problem. It's unwise spending that usually prevents prosperity.Of course, but we've largely disregarded them. Some people can borrow their way to prosperity, but most cannot.
"Money answereth everything", but sometimes the answer is wrong.
True, especially when buying food. Probably the biggest unnecessary transfer of wealth from the average family to the food industry.Borrowing is not necessarily the problem. It's unwise spending that usually prevents prosperity.
Gee. How convincing.Not really.
In other words, it would be printed.Directly from the Treasury.
So then pulling money out of the economy would have the opposite effect?
If banks quit loaning out money for cars, whats going to happen to the price of cars?
Increasing M1 is always a factor in increasing inflation.
Basic economics supply and demand.
Creating more money without increasing productivity (supply) means you've more dollars chasing a flat supply.
Prices, naturally will go up.
For the last 10 years or so the increases in M1 (and artificially low interest rates) have been offset by increased productivity.
The increasing productivity is now being offset by the trillions pumped into the economy under Trump and Biden.
Thus, more money chasing fewer goods.
Inflation.
The FED is acting to reduce M1 by increasing interest rates.
This will slow the economy possibly to the point of recession.
There are no free lunches.
When the economy is good, raise taxes. It is a blunt instrument but will serve to keep the economy from getting too hot. It also keeps the deficit and inflation down.
When the economy is slowing, lower taxes, at least temporarily. It will pump money into the economy but will add to the deficit and inflation.
You can look at the deficit as a percentage of the GDP as a lagging predictor of the inflation rates. The larger the deficit, more money printed to cover it, more money means more inflation.
As things sit, because of the huge deficits in 20/21 I think this round of inflation will last well into 23.
After the money is 'printed' it goes to the Fed, where it becomes debt.
Higher "Education" is giving the food industry a run for the money.True, especially when buying food. Probably the biggest unnecessary transfer of wealth from the average family to the food industry.
Interesting, Thanks, tend to lean this direction, Get bogged down in the confusing information so called economic experts provide.The biggest beneficiaries of Fed policies were big businesses. They received trillions of dollars from the Fed. That dwarfs the amount of money that individuals received. In addition, income inequality grew even more quickly during the pandemic. Around 6 trillion dollars flowed from the lower and middle class to the wealthy. The emergency payments and unemployment benefits allowed people to stay afloat when people were being laid off in record numbers.
Here is another thing to consider. The payments ran out beginning in May of last year. That meant ordinary people were getting less money. By your reasoning, inflation should be down.
The thing we need to look at is how much competition there is in a particular industry. When we have near monopolies or oligopolies, companies have the power to raise prices. The meat industry is a oligopoly and prices have increased rapidly. Ranchers are saying they are not getting a whole lot more money so where is the money going to? Meat companies are enjoying record profits. Look at a industry where there is competition. Look at televisions. I shop at Walmart quite a bit. The prices initially rose but have since come down to pretty close to where they were originally.
Right now CEOs are bragging they can raise prices with impunity. Their financial results show that. Despite their claim they are merely passing on their increased costs, but they are showing huge increases in their profits. This is clear proof that they are raising prices to increase their bottom line not to pass on increased costs. According to a Fed poll of oil executives, around 60% say that shareholders are the ones that are stopping them from drilling not politicians.
Oil price uncertainty is the biggest reason.
For the last 10 years or so the increases in M1 (and artificially low interest rates) have been offset by increased productivity.Gee. How convincing.
That's how the Federal Reserve caused the FDR Depression