Woodznutz
Platinum Member
- Dec 9, 2021
- 27,195
- 13,487
- 973
Directly from the Treasury.And where does that cash come from?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Directly from the Treasury.And where does that cash come from?
Searched in vain to find out.How much do you think the Fed is loaning to banks right now?
Actually, there is some truth to that:
Then there’s the not-small problem of financing. Companies can’t explore and drill, or build pipelines, without capital. Biden financial regulators allied with progressive investors are working to cut it off. The Labor Department has proposed a rule that would require 401(k) managers to consider the climate impact of their investment holdings.
The Securities and Exchange Commission is expected to issue a rule requiring companies and their financiers to disclose greenhouse gas emissions. Mr. Biden has nominated Sarah Bloom Raskin, of all people, to be the Federal Reserve’s top bank supervisor. Her top priority is using bank regulation to redirect capital from fossil fuels to green energy.
Large energy producers are buying back stock and redirecting capital to renewables because they see the Administration’s writing on the wall. Small independent producers are eager to take advantage of higher prices but can’t get loans. Many relied on private equity during the last shale boom, but now these firms are cutting them off.
Opinion | Biden’s U.S. Oil Embargo
The chart is in "millions" therefore $9,011,958,000,000.
Cool. But, you didn't answer the question.
Oil price uncertainty is the biggest reason.That is so much bullshit. A recent Dallas Fed survey showed that around 60% of oil executives show investors are the reason they are not drilling more. 9% say a lack of financing and around 7% say government regulations
That's true. When has that ever happened?So then pulling money out of the economy would have the opposite effect?
What increased demand? Where did they get the money to pay for their "demand?"Please elaborate, because that doesn't really seem to make sense. Let's imagine for a moment that a society of 1,000 people has a GDP of $1,000. They want various goods and services, and they spend whatever money they have for the things they want, at whatever prices supply and demand yields. Now, let's say that all of a the society increases to 2,000 people, who also have their own wants and needs. Assuming those wants and needs are equal to the first 1,000 people, then the increased demand should drive prices up.
So why should increasing the money supply somehow cease to have an inflationary effect in this scenario?
The question is irrelevant.
Wrong.That depends. If more money is needed for a growing economy due to a growing population then inflation need not occur.
There is a way to print huge amounts of money and actually reduce inflation, by bypassing the Fed and paying government bills directly from the Treasury. Of course this won't happen.![]()
Prog commie propaganda.The question is irrelevant. The current inflation has nothing to do with printing money. It has everything to do with oligopolies. Oligopolies can raise prices because they can, not because they have to. The financial statements show most companies are making record profits.
The new 1000 people need money to spend. Where did they get it?Only if the new 1,000 people only consume and don't also produce.
That's horseshit. The Fed is an arm of the government.It is owned by private bankers. Globalist Bankers, financiers and industrialists make up most of them. Rockefeller, Morgan, Warburg and Rothschild to name a few. The Creature from Jeckyl Island is a time-honored book on this and other events in history. They control the printing presses. They tried a few times in our history to bring a fiat currency into existence and we ended up back to gold and silver currency. These are the real powers of the world. Soros is their butler.
That's pure idiocy. "Inflation" is defined as making our currency worth less.It doesn't cause inflation as some might think. It makes our dollar worth less. Things don't cost more to make, it just takes more dollars to buy them.
Money, real money is backed by silver and gold. When you just print money without anything backing it then it's worthless.
The chart is in "millions" therefore $9,011,958,000,000.
The new 1000 people need money to spend. Where did they get it?
It sounds counterintuitive, much like burning wood to reduce global warming.Wrong.
The current inflation has nothing to do with printing money. It has everything to do with oligopolies. Oligopolies can raise prices because they can, not because they have to.
Anybody?