I'm not worried. What proof do you have that God exists? And if God DOES exist, and He would condemn me for doubting his existence with the brain that (apparently) he gave me, what kind of fucked up theology is that? I'd rather rot in Hell for having my own thoughts than enjoy Heaven as a robot of God.
Probably not. I'll just have to live with that.
I never posted it was YOUR truth. It IS true for me. But each of us are different, which makes life an interesting experience. If we were all the same, life would be dull, boring and not worth the experience. Each of us needs to embrace and accept who we are, what we are, and how we think of ourselves. And try to understand the differences in others. This has worked for me.
Well, you're just wrong. You know nothing about me. How dare you assume that you know me? That's asinine. But if you want to know something about the real me: when I was young, I DID spend a lot of time thinking about God, the afterlife, and all that. But eventually, I concluded that religion is bullshit. They can't ALL be right, but they COULD all be wrong. Also, I wasn't brought up in a religious household, so I was free to make up my own mind. I don't think you know anything at all about a real atheist, or as I like to call myself, a realist. Because that's what I am.
If I'm brought face to face with God, it'll be pretty hard to deny His existence. But until that happens, I won't believe in God.
I'm talking about objective truth, facts, reality -- which seems to have become fluid in the era of Trump. You can believe whatever you want. I don't care. But what you believe doesn't make it TRUE! You don't get to have your own world of truth apart from my world of truth. There is only one truth.
Why do you write God as G-d?
Wrong answer. Atheist are usually wrong.
Chick.com: This Was Your Life
Everything you have said or done will be played back at judgment. Will your name be in the Book of Life?chick.com
Anyway, you can take it up with Jesus on Judgement Day.
If comics are proof of the existence of G-d, would they likewise be proof of the existence of other things?
View attachment 327220
Oh, I've definitely looked for Him. I've even seen Him on LSD. But I don't believe He exists. And I stopped looking a long time ago.
Why not just substitute "the universe" for "God" in what you posted? Your postulate that if God does not exist, then nothing can exist is obviously ridiculous, since the universe DOES exist -- or else you wouldn't be reading this.
Well, it's true to ME. And that's all that matters. I'm done responding to you on this thread. Bye.
No, atheism (or as I like to characterize it, realism) is simply not believing in supernatural bullshit. Other behavior is something else.Atheism is the desire to indulge in unbridled passion.Don’t bother; it’s bad enough the Septuagint and KJV were purposely written by the Rabbis so every yeshiva educated Jew would know they’re not the real thing.^ More on that:
God Exists, I'll Prove It To You | My Jewish Learning
Maimonides formulated his own proofs for the existence of God.www.myjewishlearning.com
Nevertheless, the question of His existence I don’t ponder. And l’m not perplexed.
About other matters, definitely.
I know “Observant“ Jews who are atheists.
Dying and the atheists and liberals is that all there is complaint doesn't sound like joy to me. All you get are little bits of happiness, if that, but mostly it's about liberals and atheists always complaining about something. Can you show me to one recent post of yours that is thankful and uplifting?
We all have to wait in Hades for Judgement Day. The only ones who do not have to wait are those living when the end times come. No one knows when the end will be. Sir Isaac Newton predicted it to be around 2060. I think that's a good estimate; God will destroy the world when the false god of atheism is put before him and enough is enough.
This post of yours is a perfect example. This does not sound joyous nor happy. Sad.
Why is it important to anyone, asshole? What a stupid question.
If I stood before God and told Him that there's not a chance that He exists, I'd have to be pretty stupid! If I am ever brought before God, I absolutely will affirm His existence! But so far, that hasn't happened.
I'm pretty sure that I didn't claim to know better than God. I claimed that God doesn't exist. A totally different thing.I doubt OP has the intelligence capacity to know better than God.
To claim so is folly.
You realize that simply claiming something in a post doesn't make it a fact, right?
Well, butthead, science is based on evidence and facts. You make a hypothesis based on evidence. And then your hypothesis might be good enough to become a theory. But someone might see a flaw in your idea and shoot it down. That's how science works!
Basically, we find out that science is not skepticism but acceptance could be acceptance of a scientific theory. Also, skepticism could be doubt concerning basic religious principles (such as immortality, providence, and revelation). Thus, you had it backwards and atheists are usually wrong.
Read it and weep:
Definition of SKEPTICISM
an attitude of doubt or a disposition to incredulity either in general or toward a particular object; the doctrine that true knowledge or knowledge in a particular area is uncertain; the method of suspended judgment, systematic doubt, or criticism characteristic of skeptics… See the full definitionwww.merriam-webster.com
Definition of ACCEPTANCE
the quality or state of being accepted or acceptable; the act of accepting something or someone : the fact of being accepted : approval… See the full definition
Furthermore, you have no proof of evolution. It's all circumstantial evidence that is not observable. For example, we see no apes or monkeys that are bipedal. That which you claim to be billions of years old such as coal, diamond, and fossils have been able to be radiocarbon dated to around 10,000 years. Rocks and fossils will crumble and turn to dust in that long a time. due to natural processes.
I will simply ask, if these chalk beds are recent, where are they being formed today?I am continually impressed by your ignorance and arrogance. Below are the White Cliffs of Dover. They are composed of the microscopic skeletons of marine plankton. There may be a trillion in this photo alone. Of all the fossils found on the planet, none have been shown to violate the ToE. Not a one.
You should look in the mirror and give your "I am continually impressed by your ignorance and arrogance" spiel and then punch yourself in the head. This is part of the marine shells, actually microorganisms, that backs up Noah's Flood.
The atheist scientists think that these chalk beds speak of an old Earth since they believe chalk formed slowly and progressively over millions of years. This is not correct, so they're not fossils or microfossils. Instead, white chalk is composed almost entirely of calcium carbonate. This calcium carbonate, a very pure type of limestone, consists of billions of microorganisms including foraminifera and calcareous algae, coccoliths and rhabdoliths. Today, these microorganisms live in the upper 300–600 feet (91–183 m) of the open seas. When these microorganisms die, their calcium-rich shells accumulate on the bottom of the ocean floor, often almost 15,000–16,000 feet (4.6–4.9 km) below the surface. These shells cover about one-quarter of the surface of the earth today. It is estimated that these remains take up to 10 days or longer to reach the ocean floor and reportedly accumulate at a rate of .5–3 inches (1.25–7.5 cm) per thousand years. Instead, the chalk built up rapidly during Noah's Flood that happened 4,000 years ago. You would not see this build up using atheist science since they fall to the seafloor.
Thus, you are wrong again.
"No apes or monkeys that are bipedal"? Gorillas, chimpanzees, bononbos, and orangutangs are all partially bipedal. But clearly, you're not going to believe whatever proof is offered. So just sit in your little non-scientific hole and deny reality. Good luck!
Basically, we find out that science is not skepticism but acceptance could be acceptance of a scientific theory. Also, skepticism could be doubt concerning basic religious principles (such as immortality, providence, and revelation). Thus, you had it backwards and atheists are usually wrong
Read it and weep:
Definition of SKEPTICISM
an attitude of doubt or a disposition to incredulity either in general or toward a particular object; the doctrine that true knowledge or knowledge in a particular area is uncertain; the method of suspended judgment, systematic doubt, or criticism characteristic of skeptics… See the full definition
Definition of ACCEPTANCE
the quality or state of being accepted or acceptable; the act of accepting something or someone : the fact of being accepted : approval… See the full definition
Furthermore, you have no proof of evolution. It's all circumstantial evidence that is not observable. For example, we see no apes or monkeys that are bipedal. That which you claim to be billions of years old such as coal, diamond, and fossils have been able to be radiocarbon dated to around 10,000 years. Rocks and fossils will crumble and turn to dust in that long a time. due to natural processes.
