Do you notice how gun nuts never talk about any limits to gun ownership?

[progressive hunter]

The 2nd Amendment is, among other things, a hedge against tyranny.

Imagine what could possibly happen to a disarmed -- or a lesser armed or an under armed -- citizenry if a President (Insert name here,) had or was to have an urge to become a real life dictator.

Unless of course the gun owning contingent sides with a tyrant assuming power in this country Lee.....

~S~

We don’t have to worry about that. Liberals don’t support gun ownership and any tyrant would come from the Left.

Right wing tryants don't exist....?
~S~

Nope. Name them? I can name left wing tyrants. Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao,Saddam (his hero was Stalin and women had unprecedented rights as per Muslim world in Saddam’s Iraq) , Chechicue, Chavez, Castro, every president of East Germany, Kim Jung Un, Kim Il Sung, and any other Kim Jungs. List goes on, and, on.

Hitler, Mussolini, were right wing

 

[Bush92]

My friend who is a republican, showed me a pic of her grandchild, a 7 year old dressed in fatigues, with a weapon, a rifle. She thought it was cute, I thought it was disgusting.

---------------------------------- i figure that its really NONE of you business Penny .

You are right, and I didn't say anything, but I thought it. I wonder what he grows up to be , a mass shooter?

---------------------------------------------- naw , he'll probably grow up to be a decent guy just like me . The only difference between the kid and me is that we of my generation didn't have 'CAMO' Penny .

Are they cool with the prospect of people open carrying fully automatic wherever they go? After all, it’s the second amendment! Why is this not a thing?! Surely at GOP conventions those tough republican politicians would feel safe with knowing any fucker carrying a weapon around them is allowed to. Republicans’ idea of limiting gun violence is more guns after all. More guns the better!

If they do draw the line at these scenarios, then don’t they see how ridiculous it is to say any from of gun control is unconstitutional? Who are republicans to arbitrarily decide what level of gun laws are acceptable but democrats can’t? Hell, even their St. Scalia said gun control measures were constitutional.

Do you notice how kids have freedom of speech? You may pretend they don’t because what they choose to say can be punished by an adult in charge, but adults can be punished for what they say as well by adults in charge. After all, you can lose your job if you find yourself catcalling that new hot intern everyday.

All that matters when it comes to the first amendment and kids is that they can’t be charged with a crime for their speech. Now all this being said, are toddlers being denied their bill of rights by not being able to carry a gun?

You had a direction to start this OP.

I disagreed with it, but at least you were headed in a viable direction.

Then you lost focus.

Here, maybe this will help.

The more guns, the better.

We can only shoot one at a time, so you are worried about nothing on the number of guns we have.

And you should be glad we have as big and as bad ass weapons as we do.

The 2nd Amendment is, among other things, a hedge against tyranny.

Imagine what could possibly happen to a disarmed -- or a lesser armed or an under armed -- citizenry if a President (Insert name here,) had or was to have an urge to become a real life dictator.

You hate Trump?

Imagine not having lots of bad assed weapons to deter his ambitions if he woke up and wanted to become King.

Imagine not having lots of bad assed weapons to deter the ambitions of a President Hillary Clinton if she somehow succeeded in deposing DJT and soon after being sworn in she woke up and wanted to become Queen.

The 2nd Amendment gives us recourse.

Tell us when human nature becomes antiquated and out of date.

That is when I will give another moments thought to the 2nd Amendment, which exists to protect us from human nature.

Give some people the power to make us all subjects and they will try to do so.

Obama tried it and all he could manage was politicizing every department of the Federal government.

Just think if there had been no 2A!

Remember when he bought billions and billions of rounds of ammo for the Federal government?

He caused a months long shortage on the civilian market for all calibers of ammo.

And it is my belief he must have thought about preparing the govt. to go to war on the patriots who were going to stand up for our rights if he succeeded in trying a full blown power grab.

Liberals are NOTORIOUS for not thinking past their imnediate objective.

It is a built in handicap most of them share.

They only think about the problem of stopping random mass shootings.

But those casualty rates would be dwarfed by the numbers of patriots and Liberals who would be killed trying to regain sovereignty of our government (or help the Usurper in Chief) in case a would-be despot tried to take advantage of our disarmed state by seizing all govt power and becoming a dictator.

A terrible war would break out and millions would die.

Liberals cant imagine a guy like Obama trying anything like that. But they can imagine Trump doing it, I'd bet.

But human nature does not change.

The 2nd Amendment is our last line of defense against dictatorship and should never be made less potent to stop random mass shootings unless we would court a much worse destiny brought on by Liberal short sightedness.

The 2nd Amendment gives us recourse.

You are oh so right and the FF were more worried about a tyrannical Govt. then they were about anyone trying to invade.

They were very smart long thinking men. The 2nd will always be in the Constitution and it a damned good thing it is.

you got one now, so what are your doing about it?? Nothing.

LMAO You sure are on biased lefty loon. Trump is no more a dictator than your stupid ass is.

The country is doing great with a great economy. UE is the lowest its been since 69.

There are jobs, jobs and more jobs.

All you see is your hatred for Trump.

You sure are funny though. Piss off Trump hater. LOL

The only way to get a tyrannical Potus out of office is by voting. No the economy is not doing much better than under Obama and no matter who got voted it , it would run its cycle, he is actually hurting it. Trump is pay for play on steroids, and is a dictator, just like Putin. He spends most of the time on the golf course at his courses, where he makes deals. Then we have the hotel in Washington , pay for play on steroids.

You may want to turn a blind eye to his shenanigans but I don't. I'm glad he got voted in, but I do not think he wanted to, because his House of Cards is going to come tumbling down.

When have we had a tyrannical POTUS? Addams and Alien and Sedition Acts is all I can think of?

 

[g5000]

"The more guns, the better and safer we all are."

Funny how that does not apply to a Trump rally, isn't it?

 

[g5000]

Australia has strict gun control. When did they get a dictator after they enacted their gun laws?

Just curious.

 

[g5000]

Canada has strict gun control. When did a dictator take over after they enacted their gun laws?

Just curious.

 

[hunarcy]

Are they cool with the prospect of people open carrying fully automatic wherever they go? After all, it’s the second amendment! Why is this not a thing?! Surely at GOP conventions those tough republican politicians would feel safe with knowing any fucker carrying a weapon around them is allowed to. Republicans’ idea of limiting gun violence is more guns after all. More guns the better!

If they do draw the line at these scenarios, then don’t they see how ridiculous it is to say any from of gun control is unconstitutional? Who are republicans to arbitrarily decide what level of gun laws are acceptable but democrats can’t? Hell, even their St. Scalia said gun control measures were constitutional.

Do you notice how kids have freedom of speech? You may pretend they don’t because what they choose to say can be punished by an adult in charge, but adults can be punished for what they say as well by adults in charge. After all, you can lose your job if you find yourself catcalling that new hot intern everyday.

All that matters when it comes to the first amendment and kids is that they can’t be charged with a crime for their speech. Now all this being said, are toddlers being denied their bill of rights by not being able to carry a gun?

Perhaps because it doesn't matter what's being carried, it's the BEHAVIOR of the person that must be controlled.

 

[g5000]

Like opioids, there are a limited number of Americans who can own a gun. And yet big pharma and the gun makers have deliberately flooded the market with way more product than is justified. So they knew damned well there would be abuses and mass death.

But stock price trumped rationality and morality.

 

[g5000]

15,000 gun homicides a year and we are screaming "national emergency!" about a few starving Honduran kids sneaking across the border.

What?

The?

Fuck?!?

 

[Oddball]

Hitler, Mussolini, were right wing

Not hardly.

 

[Pete7469]

Do you ever hear anything from bed wetters about leaving people the fuck alone and not trying to limit what they can own?

Then you cock suckers wonder why everyone hates you.


.

 

[sparky]

Why would any rational person give the government control over their ability to defend themselves? Especially from all powerful governments

have you read the Patriot Act?

When have we had a tyrannical POTUS?

And just how would you define 'tyrannical'.....?

Seems some here as so far off in extremist partisan land they just aren't capable of recognizing anything 'normal'

~S~

 

[g5000]

Hitler, Mussolini, were right wing

Not hardly.

We support affirmative action for negroes, gay rights, amnesty for illegal Mexicans, and the New Green Deal!

 

[progressive hunter]

Hitler, Mussolini, were right wing

Not hardly.

View attachment 244870

thats the american scale not the european

 

[g5000]

Hitler, Mussolini, were right wing

Not hardly.

Honk if you love Obama!

 

[Daryl Hunt]

The 2nd Amendment is, among other things, a hedge against tyranny.

Imagine what could possibly happen to a disarmed -- or a lesser armed or an under armed -- citizenry if a President (Insert name here,) had or was to have an urge to become a real life dictator.

Unless of course the gun owning contingent sides with a tyrant assuming power in this country Lee.....

~S~

We don’t have to worry about that. Liberals don’t support gun ownership and any tyrant would come from the Left.

Right wing tryants don't exist....?
~S~

Nope. Name them? I can name left wing tyrants. Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao,Saddam (his hero was Stalin and women had unprecedented rights as per Muslim world in Saddam’s Iraq) , Chechicue, Chavez, Castro, every president of East Germany, Kim Jung Un, Kim Il Sung, and any other Kim Jungs. List goes on, and, on.

Hate to break it to you, cupcake but Hitler, Mussolini are both Right wing as well as Franco. This is why both Germany and Italy came to Francos side during the Spanish Civil War. The Left was a failed Socialist Movement that Franco was overthrowing. And as bad as Franco was, the National Republic of Spain (Socialists) made him look like a choir boy.

You can call anything a National Socialist Government if you want but that doesn't make it one. Hitler's rise to power was learned from Mussolini who wrote the book on Fascism which is an extreme right wing. And so did Franco. But Fascism gone too far leads to the exact same place that socialism out of control does. It leads to a Dictator. And it leads to exactly the same conclusion if you continue it. Or the Dictator has to die of old age. Most never make it that far. Maduro is a out of control Socialist who didn't quite finish reading Mussolinis final chapter and the regular Socialists are winning like they must sooner or later. While he started out on the left, he's no longer left. He's a Dictator. That last chapter is the same whether it's a RW or LW dictator and always ends the same way. Raul Castro understands this and has backed away from the dictator role quite a bit. His Brother was on his way out. People were just waiting for him to die of old age.

So, there ARE RW Tyrants. But mostly, they come from the capitalist side of things and not the socialist side of things. But by the time they reach tyrant or dicator status, it doesn't matter which side they started from. They are all the same. For instance, Trump is a Fascist. I know you hate it when I use that term. But another person pointed this out. Most Privately owned Corporate Owners are Fascists by nature. That's what makes it work best in a Capitalist Business. And Trump doesn't tolerate being told NO by anyone. That works for a Business but not for a Government. The only reason he isn't a tyrant isn't from the lack of trying, it's the fact that the Constitution of the United States and the Uniform Code of Military Justice prevents him for acting on it. The first time he really had anyone give him a solid "NO" was Pelosi. He got used to being the "Individual 1" but is now demoted to the lowly position of the "President of the United States". Oh the Horror.

 

[g5000]

Hitler, Mussolini, were right wing

Not hardly.

View attachment 244870

thats the american scale not the european

It's a fake scale made up for the consumption of retards with the intellectual bandwidth of a bumper sticker.

Everyone in America knows Nazis are right wing, except for our obligatory retard demographic.

 

[SmokeALib]

Canada has strict gun control. When did a dictator take over after they enacted their gun laws?

Just curious.

Ah, Canadians own over 10 million guns. All you need to do is pass a safety course and get a license. Strict gun control? Or leftist traitor talking point?

 

[SmokeALib]

Hitler, Mussolini, were right wing

Not hardly.

View attachment 244870

thats the american scale not the european

It's a fake scale made up for the consumption of retards with the intellectual bandwidth of a bumper sticker.

Everyone in America knows Nazis are right wing, except for our obligatory retard demographic.

And everybody knows leftists are trash. Point?

 

[g5000]

Canada has strict gun control. When did a dictator take over after they enacted their gun laws?

Just curious.

Ah, Canadians own over 10 million guns. All you need to do is pass a safety course and get a license. Strict gun control? Or leftist traitor talking point?

So you're cool with requiring a safety course? That is not strict? Awesome!

But there is more than that to getting a gun in Canada, especially if you want an AR-15.

Any significant other you have had a relationship with in the past two years has to be contacted and asked if you should have a gun. And the RMCP has to interview two people who know you.

Rifle magazines are restricted to five rounds, handguns to ten.


So...yeah. Strict.

Can you tell me when a dictator took over Canada?

 

[g5000]

Hitler, Mussolini, were right wing

Not hardly.

View attachment 244870

thats the american scale not the european

It's a fake scale made up for the consumption of retards with the intellectual bandwidth of a bumper sticker.

Everyone in America knows Nazis are right wing, except for our obligatory retard demographic.

And everybody knows leftists are trash. Point?

I agree. Leftists are trash. Point?