Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah, dumbshit, that’s how amendments work. If they were added during the time the constitution was drafted, they wouldn’t be “amendments”.And I don't see the Bill of Rights as the governing document since it was written AFTER the Constitution of the United States was Ratified.
I don’t need to get it changed...it already states I have an uninfriged right!Now, it you want it to mean what you say it should, get it changed in Congress through an Amendment.
Why would I be pissed about that when you don’t even matter? Nobody cares about your radical, Unabomber “take” on things. Nobody. Write your little manifesto. I don’t care. And nobody else will either.You are pissed that someone else has a different take on things
Yeah, dumbshit, that’s how amendments work. If they were added during the time the constitution was drafted, they wouldn’t be “amendments”.And I don't see the Bill of Rights as the governing document since it was written AFTER the Constitution of the United States was Ratified.
You can nitpick all you want but the Bill off Rights has no legal strength. It's a piece of history. It's a copy of the Constitution of the United States. I guess they decided to do a makework assignment that day in 1791.
There are a zillion reasons, but I’ll skip them all just hit you with the one that places the nails in your proverbial coffin. The founders extensively discussed firearms, guns, etc. and their purpose for the 2nd Amendment. Extensively. Your dumb ass has failed to study history, and that has caused you to sound like an absolute idiot as you attempt to claim that nobody knows what the founders meant in the 2nd Amendment.Isn't there many definitions of the word "Arms" in context to weapons? What makes you right and everyone else wrong?
It’s Unabomber, dumb ass.Oh, now I'm a Unibomber.
There are a zillion reasons, but I’ll skip them all just hit you with the one that places the nails in your proverbial coffin. The founders extensively discussed firearms, guns, etc. and their purpose for the 2nd Amendment. Extensively. Your dumb ass has failed to study history, and that has caused you to sound like an absolute idiot as you attempt to claim that nobody knows what the founders meant in the 2nd Amendment.Isn't there many definitions of the word "Arms" in context to weapons? What makes you right and everyone else wrong?
Um...no I don’t. The Magna Carta was not passed by our founders. It was not approved for governing the U.S. I don’t have to go by anything on the Magna Carta.If you want to go by the document that the Constitution of the United States borrowed from call the Bill of Rights, you have to use the one from 1688 and the Magna Carta dated 1215.
Yeah...and thank God we are strictly governed by the U.S. Constitution and nothing else (including the Magna Carta).Neither one said anything about any weapons. That was strictly a US Constitution Idea.
Yes.And this Idiot knows that ALL the states have some form of Weapons Regulations in affect. Is every State unconstitutional?
Nope. Not at all. We should continue to educate, advocate, and elect representatives who will restore constitutional government.Should we all rise up in a revolution and overthrow every state government?
I’m glad you asked. Here is what it says...What does it say about States regulating Arms, meaning Guns, swords, knives of X inches, etc..
It never meant “control by government”. It meant “well functioning”."In colonial times the term ‘well regulated’ meant ‘well functioning’
Um...no I don’t. The Magna Carta was not passed by our founders. It was not approved for governing the U.S. I don’t have to go by anything on the Magna Carta.If you want to go by the document that the Constitution of the United States borrowed from call the Bill of Rights, you have to use the one from 1688 and the Magna Carta dated 1215.
Yeah...and thank God we are strictly governed by the U.S. Constitution and nothing else (including the Magna Carta).Neither one said anything about any weapons. That was strictly a US Constitution Idea.
Yes.And this Idiot knows that ALL the states have some form of Weapons Regulations in affect. Is every State unconstitutional?
Nope. Not at all. We should continue to educate, advocate, and elect representatives who will restore constitutional government.Should we all rise up in a revolution and overthrow every state government?
As long as we have clean and fair elections, and court systems that are not corrupt, there should be no reason for revolt. That’s why our founders gave us these tools. So we wouldn’t have to resort to violence.
I’m glad you asked. Here is what it says...What does it say about States regulating Arms, meaning Guns, swords, knives of X inches, etc..
It never meant “control by government”. It meant “well functioning”."In colonial times the term ‘well regulated’ meant ‘well functioning’
It’s Unabomber, dumb ass.Oh, now I'm a Unibomber.
Uni means single. Una was short for “University and Airline” because that’s what he was bombing.
Most libtards don't.You know I’m right.Oh to be young again.
I remember when I had MY first beer.
I know (from your post) that you either do not know or care to know what the purpose of the 2nd Amendment is.
No...they wouldn’t be proud of oppressive leftists who have pissed all over the U.S. Constitution.But I have a feeling they wouldn't be too proud of us right now with all the hate and venom.
Again...that’s your “interpretation” because you don’t like not being able to control others. The fact is, “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” could not possibly be any more crystal clear.Again, that's your interpretation. Others may have another. This is why it's needs to be made crystal clear.
Sure you do, stolen valor, buy. - sure you do.I probably have more time with weapons of war of all types than you ever will...
