Do you notice how gun nuts never talk about any limits to gun ownership?

[Daryl Hunt]

Hitler, Mussolini, were right wing

Not hardly.

View attachment 244870

thats the american scale not the european

It's a fake scale made up for the consumption of retards with the intellectual bandwidth of a bumper sticker.

Everyone in America knows Nazis are right wing, except for our obligatory retard demographic.

And everybody knows leftists are trash. Point?

And rightwingers are white trash. What's your point, cupcake?

 

[SmokeALib]

Canada has strict gun control. When did a dictator take over after they enacted their gun laws?

Just curious.

Ah, Canadians own over 10 million guns. All you need to do is pass a safety course and get a license. Strict gun control? Or leftist traitor talking point?

So you're cool with requiring a safety course? That is not strict? Awesome!

But there is more than that to getting a gun in Canada, especially if you want an AR-15.

Any significant other you have had a relationship with in the past two years has to be contacted and asked if you should have a gun. And the RMCP has to interview two people who know you.


So...yeah. Strict.

Can you tell me when a dictator took over Canada?

No, dingus. Not strict. Banning firearms would be strict. Canada has pretty lax gun laws for a socialist country.

 

[g5000]

It's going to be hard to overthrow a dictator in Canada when you can only have a five round magazine in your rifle!

 

[SmokeALib]

Hitler, Mussolini, were right wing

Not hardly.

View attachment 244870

thats the american scale not the european

It's a fake scale made up for the consumption of retards with the intellectual bandwidth of a bumper sticker.

Everyone in America knows Nazis are right wing, except for our obligatory retard demographic.

And everybody knows leftists are trash. Point?

And rightwingers are white trash. What's your point, cupcake?

Pelosi panties stuck in your throat?

 

[g5000]

Canada has strict gun control. When did a dictator take over after they enacted their gun laws?

Just curious.

Ah, Canadians own over 10 million guns. All you need to do is pass a safety course and get a license. Strict gun control? Or leftist traitor talking point?

So you're cool with requiring a safety course? That is not strict? Awesome!

But there is more than that to getting a gun in Canada, especially if you want an AR-15.

Any significant other you have had a relationship with in the past two years has to be contacted and asked if you should have a gun. And the RMCP has to interview two people who know you.


So...yeah. Strict.

Can you tell me when a dictator took over Canada?

No, dingus. Not strict. Banning firearms would be strict. Canada has pretty lax gun laws for a socialist country.

All right!

We have SmokeALib (ironic name) on record saying that safety courses, interviews with past lovers, interviews of at least two people who know you, limiting your rifle magazine to five rounds, and getting a permit are not strict requirements.

Awesome.

Who's next?

 

[SmokeALib]

It's going to be hard to overthrow a dictator in Canada when you can only have a five round magazine in your rifle!

So are you suggesting that there are no criminals in Canada that would use a 19 round mag?

 

[g5000]

It's going to be hard to overthrow a dictator in Canada when you can only have a five round magazine in your rifle!

So are you suggesting that there are no criminals in Canada that would use a 19 round mag?

You're going to count on criminals to overthrow a dictator?

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Canada has strict gun control. When did a dictator take over after they enacted their gun laws?

Just curious.

Ah, Canadians own over 10 million guns. All you need to do is pass a safety course and get a license. Strict gun control? Or leftist traitor talking point?

So you're cool with requiring a safety course? That is not strict? Awesome!

But there is more than that to getting a gun in Canada, especially if you want an AR-15.

Any significant other you have had a relationship with in the past two years has to be contacted and asked if you should have a gun. And the RMCP has to interview two people who know you.


So...yeah. Strict.

Can you tell me when a dictator took over Canada?

No, dingus. Not strict. Banning firearms would be strict. Canada has pretty lax gun laws for a socialist country.

Most countries through out the world would have a revolution on their hands if they had the same gun laws that NYC or most major cities have. With the exception of North Korea and a few other Totalitarian Countries. Even Russia has lax laws in comparison. Then there is Yemen with NO gun laws and we see how that works out, don't we. You can have too much or too little.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Not hardly.

View attachment 244870

thats the american scale not the european

It's a fake scale made up for the consumption of retards with the intellectual bandwidth of a bumper sticker.

Everyone in America knows Nazis are right wing, except for our obligatory retard demographic.

And everybody knows leftists are trash. Point?

And rightwingers are white trash. What's your point, cupcake?

Pelosi panties stuck in your throat?

And Trumps little Jonesy is stuck in your ..........

 

[Bush92]

My friend who is a republican, showed me a pic of her grandchild, a 7 year old dressed in fatigues, with a weapon, a rifle. She thought it was cute, I thought it was disgusting.

Had my first hunting rifle at 9. Skills helped me later fighting Iraqi Army.

Yes and did you see battle? My opinion of being in battle, they either come back with PTSD, or come back wanting for more bloodshed. No winner from war.

Sure did.

Funny you should mention that. I came back. It took a few months of therapy while on active duty to take care of the worst of the problems. But I have been certified as sane. Yes, cupcake, I have a paper that says I am sane. Can you say the same? While I am certified sane, what is to say that you aren't crazier than a looney bird?

And I don't have any undying need to kill anyone or anything for that matter. I also don't feel the urge to go out and horde lots of guns. I'll leave the hording to others if it trips their trigger. One or two or three is plenty for me. Actually, zero is just as good. When you meet me on the street or enter my home, you just have to ask yourself a question, is it one, two, three or none. Makes things a bit interesting, don't it. It suffices to know that I can and have used weapons and am very capable of using them but I choose not to. It's a choice. I like my choice. It soothes me.

Most of us come back with the only thing we want is to get back to a normal life. What we don't need is for some nutball harping on like you do about a subject you know nothing about. Maybe you need to go find out for yourself.

Well said. Pray for you brother.

 

[sakinago]

Are they cool with the prospect of people open carrying fully automatic wherever they go? After all, it’s the second amendment! Why is this not a thing?! Surely at GOP conventions those tough republican politicians would feel safe with knowing any ****** carrying a weapon around them is allowed to. Republicans’ idea of limiting gun violence is more guns after all. More guns the better!

If they do draw the line at these scenarios, then don’t they see how ridiculous it is to say any from of gun control is unconstitutional? Who are republicans to arbitrarily decide what level of gun laws are acceptable but democrats can’t? Hell, even their St. Scalia said gun control measures were constitutional.

Do you notice how kids have freedom of speech? You may pretend they don’t because what they choose to say can be punished by an adult in charge, but adults can be punished for what they say as well by adults in charge. After all, you can lose your job if you find yourself catcalling that new hot intern everyday.

All that matters when it comes to the first amendment and kids is that they can’t be charged with a crime for their speech. Now all this being said, are toddlers being denied their bill of rights by not being able to carry a gun?

This is discussed all the time, just not in your echo chamber. Btw this sword cuts both ways, gun ownership has been rising and gun laws on things like ARs have been reduced, yet gun crime drops. The Swiss are issued full autos and can walk around where they please with it on their shoulder, yet they are one of the safest countries on the planet. Those in your echo chamber have no response to this, which is why you never hear about it. You’re bringing up a topic that has been flushed out thousands of times on this message board, welcome to the party, everyone already left, but there might be some cold pizza left for you.

 

[Bush92]

"The more guns, the better and safer we all are."

Funny how that does not apply to a Trump rally, isn't it?

Your a clown...like the fact your avatar is Ronald McDonald. That’s the employment that Democratic Party offers you.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Are they cool with the prospect of people open carrying fully automatic wherever they go? After all, it’s the second amendment! Why is this not a thing?! Surely at GOP conventions those tough republican politicians would feel safe with knowing any ****** carrying a weapon around them is allowed to. Republicans’ idea of limiting gun violence is more guns after all. More guns the better!

If they do draw the line at these scenarios, then don’t they see how ridiculous it is to say any from of gun control is unconstitutional? Who are republicans to arbitrarily decide what level of gun laws are acceptable but democrats can’t? Hell, even their St. Scalia said gun control measures were constitutional.

Do you notice how kids have freedom of speech? You may pretend they don’t because what they choose to say can be punished by an adult in charge, but adults can be punished for what they say as well by adults in charge. After all, you can lose your job if you find yourself catcalling that new hot intern everyday.

All that matters when it comes to the first amendment and kids is that they can’t be charged with a crime for their speech. Now all this being said, are toddlers being denied their bill of rights by not being able to carry a gun?

This is discussed all the time, just not in your echo chamber. Btw this sword cuts both ways, gun ownership has been rising and gun laws on things like ARs have been reduced, yet gun crime drops. The Swiss are issued full autos and can walk around where they please with it on their shoulder, yet they are one of the safest countries on the planet. Those in your echo chamber have no response to this, which is why you never hear about it. You’re bringing up a topic that has been flushed out thousands of times on this message board, welcome to the party, everyone already left, but there might be some cold pizza left for you.

The Swiss do NOT allow full autos to be taken home. They only allow semi auto and bolt action to be signed out at the time of separation. And then only if you do the right paperwork. What is happening today, more and more are electing not to apply to take those weapons home with them. But there are abosutely NO full auto weapons allowed in a Civilians hands without some really hairy paperwork and background checks as well as Registrations.

 

[Oddball]

Hate to break it to you, cupcake but Hitler, Mussolini are both Right wing as well as Franco. This is why both Germany and Italy came to Francos side during the Spanish Civil War. The Left was a failed Socialist Movement that Franco was overthrowing. And as bad as Franco was, the National Republic of Spain (Socialists) made him look like a choir boy.

You can call anything a National Socialist Government if you want but that doesn't make it one. Hitler's rise to power was learned from Mussolini who wrote the book on Fascism which is an extreme right wing. And so did Franco. But Fascism gone too far leads to the exact same place that socialism out of control does. It leads to a Dictator. And it leads to exactly the same conclusion if you continue it. Or the Dictator has to die of old age. Most never make it that far. Maduro is a out of control Socialist who didn't quite finish reading Mussolinis final chapter and the regular Socialists are winning like they must sooner or later. While he started out on the left, he's no longer left. He's a Dictator. That last chapter is the same whether it's a RW or LW dictator and always ends the same way. Raul Castro understands this and has backed away from the dictator role quite a bit. His Brother was on his way out. People were just waiting for him to die of old age.

So, there ARE RW Tyrants. But mostly, they come from the capitalist side of things and not the socialist side of things. But by the time they reach tyrant or dicator status, it doesn't matter which side they started from. They are all the same. For instance, Trump is a Fascist. I know you hate it when I use that term. But another person pointed this out. Most Privately owned Corporate Owners are Fascists by nature. That's what makes it work best in a Capitalist Business. And Trump doesn't tolerate being told NO by anyone. That works for a Business but not for a Government. The only reason he isn't a tyrant isn't from the lack of trying, it's the fact that the Constitution of the United States and the Uniform Code of Military Justice prevents him for acting on it. The first time he really had anyone give him a solid "NO" was Pelosi. He got used to being the "Individual 1" but is now demoted to the lowly position of the "President of the United States". Oh the Horror.

 

[Flash]

Anti gun nuts tell you that they believe in the right to keep and bear arms on one breath but then the bastards start telling how they want to infringe upon that right in the next breath.

The lying assholes tell you that aren't out to confiscate your firearms but them tell you they think firearms should be banned.

Can't trust the turd brains.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

"The more guns, the better and safer we all are."

Funny how that does not apply to a Trump rally, isn't it?

Your a clown...like the fact your avatar is Ronald McDonald. That’s the employment that Democratic Party offers you.

Hey, it's a job. And it pays better than MOST jobs that many Rightwingers have offered to them. Is there a problem being employed? Or were you scared by a clown when you a small child or what?

 

[Bush92]

Why would any rational person give the government control over their ability to defend themselves? Especially from all powerful governments

have you read the Patriot Act?

When have we had a tyrannical POTUS?

And just how would you define 'tyrannical'.....?

Seems some here as so far off in extremist partisan land they just aren't capable of recognizing anything 'normal'

~S~

Spoke against the Patriot Act on Saturday television news program. Disagree with FISA warrants because I am a conservative. The left loves government control.

 

[g5000]

Canada has strict gun control. When did a dictator take over after they enacted their gun laws?

Just curious.

Ah, Canadians own over 10 million guns. All you need to do is pass a safety course and get a license. Strict gun control? Or leftist traitor talking point?

So you're cool with requiring a safety course? That is not strict? Awesome!

But there is more than that to getting a gun in Canada, especially if you want an AR-15.

Any significant other you have had a relationship with in the past two years has to be contacted and asked if you should have a gun. And the RMCP has to interview two people who know you.


So...yeah. Strict.

Can you tell me when a dictator took over Canada?

No, dingus. Not strict. Banning firearms would be strict. Canada has pretty lax gun laws for a socialist country.

You need to look at the topic title, smokey. It's about LIMITS, not bans. Try to catch up!

Since you consider Canada's limits not to be strict, then you are clearly to the left of me when it comes to gun control. Because in my book, Canada is very strict.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

Hate to break it to you, cupcake but Hitler, Mussolini are both Right wing as well as Franco. This is why both Germany and Italy came to Francos side during the Spanish Civil War. The Left was a failed Socialist Movement that Franco was overthrowing. And as bad as Franco was, the National Republic of Spain (Socialists) made him look like a choir boy.

You can call anything a National Socialist Government if you want but that doesn't make it one. Hitler's rise to power was learned from Mussolini who wrote the book on Fascism which is an extreme right wing. And so did Franco. But Fascism gone too far leads to the exact same place that socialism out of control does. It leads to a Dictator. And it leads to exactly the same conclusion if you continue it. Or the Dictator has to die of old age. Most never make it that far. Maduro is a out of control Socialist who didn't quite finish reading Mussolinis final chapter and the regular Socialists are winning like they must sooner or later. While he started out on the left, he's no longer left. He's a Dictator. That last chapter is the same whether it's a RW or LW dictator and always ends the same way. Raul Castro understands this and has backed away from the dictator role quite a bit. His Brother was on his way out. People were just waiting for him to die of old age.

So, there ARE RW Tyrants. But mostly, they come from the capitalist side of things and not the socialist side of things. But by the time they reach tyrant or dicator status, it doesn't matter which side they started from. They are all the same. For instance, Trump is a Fascist. I know you hate it when I use that term. But another person pointed this out. Most Privately owned Corporate Owners are Fascists by nature. That's what makes it work best in a Capitalist Business. And Trump doesn't tolerate being told NO by anyone. That works for a Business but not for a Government. The only reason he isn't a tyrant isn't from the lack of trying, it's the fact that the Constitution of the United States and the Uniform Code of Military Justice prevents him for acting on it. The first time he really had anyone give him a solid "NO" was Pelosi. He got used to being the "Individual 1" but is now demoted to the lowly position of the "President of the United States". Oh the Horror.

View attachment 244875

Wow, when a rwingnutjob can't keep up, make sure you have a Meme handy. It's right up there with holding your hands over your ears and screaming over and over "LaLaLa...I can't her you.......LaLaLa....."

 

[westwall]

Are they cool with the prospect of people open carrying fully automatic wherever they go? After all, it’s the second amendment! Why is this not a thing?! Surely at GOP conventions those tough republican politicians would feel safe with knowing any ****** carrying a weapon around them is allowed to. Republicans’ idea of limiting gun violence is more guns after all. More guns the better!

If they do draw the line at these scenarios, then don’t they see how ridiculous it is to say any from of gun control is unconstitutional? Who are republicans to arbitrarily decide what level of gun laws are acceptable but democrats can’t? Hell, even their St. Scalia said gun control measures were constitutional.

Do you notice how kids have freedom of speech? You may pretend they don’t because what they choose to say can be punished by an adult in charge, but adults can be punished for what they say as well by adults in charge. After all, you can lose your job if you find yourself catcalling that new hot intern everyday.

All that matters when it comes to the first amendment and kids is that they can’t be charged with a crime for their speech. Now all this being said, are toddlers being denied their bill of rights by not being able to carry a gun?

What's funny is you spew all of this nonsense but have no clue of the actual facts.

In all the years of the NFA. There has been but one use of a legally held machine gun to commit a crime, and it was a cop that did it.

So much for machine guns being a hazard.

Sent from my SM-G892A using USMessageBoard.com mobile app