Do you Believe Kavanaugh's Rape Accuser?

[Billy_Bob]

Ford will not bellowed to go after Kavanugh as he must be able to defend himself from her accusations. These bastards (Fords attorney's) are political whores as they violate US Jurisprudence with their fantasy of turning our judicial system on its head. The requests defy reason and 250 years of judicial precedent.

 

[Billy_Bob]

We have moved pass the idea that a drunk high school kid may hsve tried to force himself on a high school girl.

The question has become whether Kavanaugh lied. And if he lied under oath, does he get prosecuted for it?

Wow, you sure are getting ahead of yourself. If she lied, is she going to be prosecuted? If not, why not?

Ford passed the line into slander a long time ago. The letter she wrote to Finestien is evidence of slander in writing. I'm betting this bimbo doesn't testify in an effort to keep from being sued and held civilly liable for slander.

So, Kavanaugh can prove he didn't do it?

If there isno proof, is everything legal?

Proving something never happened, without a place or time in nearly impossible.

That is exactly why we use the concept of innocent until PROVEN guilty.

But it does show your love of Nazi ideology quit clearly.

You know its the severity of the charge not the facts (or in this case the lack of facts) of the matter.

Standard Democrat lies and deceptions.. Feelings.... They do not deal in facts... this is how they control the mob to get what they want. Keep them in frenzy and without rational thought and the mob will kill themselves for you...

 

[Billy_Bob]

Is it surprising that she doesn't remember the ******* YEAR that it happened? Your are one dumb SOB.

Really? Summer 1982 when she was 15... you didn’t get the memo?

Please provide your proof... Even her therapist was unable to ascertain this information... All she could narrow it to was a three year period.

I don’t have proof, I haven’t spoken to her or even heard her speak. I’ve read an article written by a reporter and a letter the accuser wrote to a congress woman. So there isn’t enough information to say for sure what she knows and doesn’t know. The article says she was 15 it was summer at the end of her sophomore year in 1982. That’s all I’ve seen so far. You all who try and discredit her for not knowing the year are full of shit with that talking point.

Your an idiot. I investigated crimes for many years and this woman hasn't a leg to stand on.

You keep repeating conjecture in the hopes that it will take hold and people will believe your bull shit.. My training and experience tell me this woman is a liar. Take your bull shit elsewhere..

Ok Mr Investigator. Let’s go off your conclusion that she is lying. Humor me and answer 3 simple questions.

1. If she was making up this accusation, why would she implicate Kav and his friend Judge and not just the guy she was going after? Adding the extra person only makes the lie tougher to make stick

The three people Ford has named have either given written depositions that the event never happened or stated that they have no knowledge of any event. Even her therapist was NEVER given names, locations, or credible dates and these are documented in her contemporaneous notes.

That alone discredits her testimony so severely that she has no credibility. Then we take the notes in her year book about the numerous parties she attended and became black out drunk (of her own will) while parents were gone and you have a total destruction of all credibility.

She is NOT credible on any level.. A first year attorney could get this case thrown out in about 30 seconds..

 

[hadit]

Really? Summer 1982 when she was 15... you didn’t get the memo?

Please provide your proof... Even her therapist was unable to ascertain this information... All she could narrow it to was a three year period.

I don’t have proof, I haven’t spoken to her or even heard her speak. I’ve read an article written by a reporter and a letter the accuser wrote to a congress woman. So there isn’t enough information to say for sure what she knows and doesn’t know. The article says she was 15 it was summer at the end of her sophomore year in 1982. That’s all I’ve seen so far. You all who try and discredit her for not knowing the year are full of shit with that talking point.

Your an idiot. I investigated crimes for many years and this woman hasn't a leg to stand on.

You keep repeating conjecture in the hopes that it will take hold and people will believe your bull shit.. My training and experience tell me this woman is a liar. Take your bull shit elsewhere..

Ok Mr Investigator. Let’s go off your conclusion that she is lying. Humor me and answer 3 simple questions.

1. If she was making up this accusation, why would she implicate Kav and his friend Judge and not just the guy she was going after? Adding the extra person only makes the lie tougher to make stick

The three people Ford has named have either given written depositions that the event never happened or stated that they have no knowledge of any event. Even her therapist was NEVER given names, locations, or credible dates and these are documented in her contemporaneous notes.

That alone discredits her testimony so severely that she has no credibility. Then we take the notes in her year book about the numerous parties she attended and became black out drunk (of her own will) while parents were gone and you have a total destruction of all credibility.

She is NOT credible on any level.. A first year attorney could get this case thrown out in about 30 seconds..

Yeah but, abortion and stuff.

 

[RealDave]

We have moved pass the idea that a drunk high school kid may hsve tried to force himself on a high school girl.

The question has become whether Kavanaugh lied. And if he lied under oath, does he get prosecuted for it?

Wow, you sure are getting ahead of yourself. If she lied, is she going to be prosecuted? If not, why not?

Ford passed the line into slander a long time ago. The letter she wrote to Finestien is evidence of slander in writing. I'm betting this bimbo doesn't testify in an effort to keep from being sued and held civilly liable for slander.

So, Kavanaugh can prove he didn't do it?

If there isno proof, is everything legal?

Your a ******* moron...

In the US the ACCUSER is the one who must prove guilt of the accused. That is why US jurisprudence affords the accused the status of INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.

Fords attorney's are using socialist and Nazi state tactics in order to turn it on its head..

Her proof? Her statement of events.

There are a total of three witnesses: Ford, Kavanagh & Kavanauugh's friend Judge.

Judge says he has no memory of it. So it is Ford's word against Kavanaugh's word.

 

[RealDave]

We have moved pass the idea that a drunk high school kid may hsve tried to force himself on a high school girl.

The question has become whether Kavanaugh lied. And if he lied under oath, does he get prosecuted for it?

Wow, you sure are getting ahead of yourself. If she lied, is she going to be prosecuted? If not, why not?

Ford passed the line into slander a long time ago. The letter she wrote to Finestien is evidence of slander in writing. I'm betting this bimbo doesn't testify in an effort to keep from being sued and held civilly liable for slander.

So, Kavanaugh can prove he didn't do it?

If there isno proof, is everything legal?

Proving something never happened, without a place or time in nearly impossible.

That is exactly why we use the concept of innocent until PROVEN guilty.

But it does show your love of Nazi ideology quit clearly.

So if I asked you & you ever raped Susie from your high school, you couldn't answer without me mentioning a particulsar date?

 

[hadit]

We have moved pass the idea that a drunk high school kid may hsve tried to force himself on a high school girl.

The question has become whether Kavanaugh lied. And if he lied under oath, does he get prosecuted for it?

Wow, you sure are getting ahead of yourself. If she lied, is she going to be prosecuted? If not, why not?

Ford passed the line into slander a long time ago. The letter she wrote to Finestien is evidence of slander in writing. I'm betting this bimbo doesn't testify in an effort to keep from being sued and held civilly liable for slander.

So, Kavanaugh can prove he didn't do it?

If there isno proof, is everything legal?

Proving something never happened, without a place or time in nearly impossible.

That is exactly why we use the concept of innocent until PROVEN guilty.

But it does show your love of Nazi ideology quit clearly.

So if I asked you & you ever raped Susie from your high school, you couldn't answer without me mentioning a particulsar date?

Kavenaugh has categorically denied her allegation. He's willing to testify to the effect, but it seems that she is, shall we say, a little reluctant to make her case under oath.

 

[Pop23]

We have moved pass the idea that a drunk high school kid may hsve tried to force himself on a high school girl.

The question has become whether Kavanaugh lied. And if he lied under oath, does he get prosecuted for it?

Wow, you sure are getting ahead of yourself. If she lied, is she going to be prosecuted? If not, why not?

Ford passed the line into slander a long time ago. The letter she wrote to Finestien is evidence of slander in writing. I'm betting this bimbo doesn't testify in an effort to keep from being sued and held civilly liable for slander.

So, Kavanaugh can prove he didn't do it?

If there isno proof, is everything legal?

Proving something never happened, without a place or time in nearly impossible.

That is exactly why we use the concept of innocent until PROVEN guilty.

But it does show your love of Nazi ideology quit clearly.

So if I asked you & you ever raped Susie from your high school, you couldn't answer without me mentioning a particulsar date?

Indeed I could, and he has answered the question.

You either already knew that, or are too damn stupid to do even the most basic research. (I would say just too damn lazy, but that is incredibly obvious)

 

[Pop23]

We have moved pass the idea that a drunk high school kid may hsve tried to force himself on a high school girl.

The question has become whether Kavanaugh lied. And if he lied under oath, does he get prosecuted for it?

Wow, you sure are getting ahead of yourself. If she lied, is she going to be prosecuted? If not, why not?

Ford passed the line into slander a long time ago. The letter she wrote to Finestien is evidence of slander in writing. I'm betting this bimbo doesn't testify in an effort to keep from being sued and held civilly liable for slander.

So, Kavanaugh can prove he didn't do it?

If there isno proof, is everything legal?

Your a ******* moron...

In the US the ACCUSER is the one who must prove guilt of the accused. That is why US jurisprudence affords the accused the status of INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.

Fords attorney's are using socialist and Nazi state tactics in order to turn it on its head..

Her proof? Her statement of events.

There are a total of three witnesses: Ford, Kavanagh & Kavanauugh's friend Judge.

Judge says he has no memory of it. So it is Ford's word against Kavanaugh's word.

Once again you are too lazy to do even basic research. Ford claims there were 4 witnesses, and none so far knows what the hell she's talking about.

 

[danielpalos]

equal rights!

 

[The Professor]

Is it surprising that she doesn't remember the ******* YEAR that it happened? Your are one dumb SOB.

Really? Summer 1982 when she was 15... you didn’t get the memo?

Please provide your proof... Even her therapist was unable to ascertain this information... All she could narrow it to was a three year period.

I don’t have proof, I haven’t spoken to her or even heard her speak. I’ve read an article written by a reporter and a letter the accuser wrote to a congress woman. So there isn’t enough information to say for sure what she knows and doesn’t know. The article says she was 15 it was summer at the end of her sophomore year in 1982. That’s all I’ve seen so far. You all who try and discredit her for not knowing the year are full of shit with that talking point.

Your an idiot. I investigated crimes for many years and this woman hasn't a leg to stand on.

You keep repeating conjecture in the hopes that it will take hold and people will believe your bull shit.. My training and experience tell me this woman is a liar. Take your bull shit elsewhere..

Ok Mr Investigator. Let’s go off your conclusion that she is lying. Humor me and answer 3 simple questions.

1. If she was making up this accusation, why would she implicate Kav and his friend Judge and not just the guy she was going after? Adding the extra person only makes the lie tougher to make stick

She also accused Judge because Judge would be in the same boat as Kavanaugh, unable to defend himself given that Ford couldn't remember the year it happened or in which house it happened. Ford probably thought that by saying another person saw it she would be more believable. It apparently worked on some posters here because they believe that Judge was in fact involved and was lying to protect his friend.

Now look at yourself. You believe she is telling the truth because she named a “witness”. See how easy that works?

 

[danielpalos]

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed, could do more to engender more cost effective management opportunities for the private sector.

More motivated Labor will look for work, less motivated Labor won't. The employer benefits from a more motivated, ready reserve Labor force.

A horrible Boss who knows how to achieve Profit, really should able proclaim His or Her own Firm, His or Her rules.

Practice makes Perfect, could be, Firm policy.

 

[S.J.]

There are tons of possibilities to explain several scenarios, call them straws if you want, I don’t care.

I don't see you discussing the more likely scenario that she made the whole thing up.

 

[hadit]

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed, could do more to engender more cost effective management opportunities for the private sector.

More motivated Labor will look for work, less motivated Labor won't. The employer benefits from a more motivated, ready reserve Labor force.

A horrible Boss who knows how to achieve Profit, really should able proclaim His or Her own Firm, His or Her rules.

Practice makes Perfect, could be, Firm policy.

Please pay attention to the subject of the thread.

 

[danielpalos]

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed, could do more to engender more cost effective management opportunities for the private sector.

More motivated Labor will look for work, less motivated Labor won't. The employer benefits from a more motivated, ready reserve Labor force.

A horrible Boss who knows how to achieve Profit, really should able proclaim His or Her own Firm, His or Her rules.

Practice makes Perfect, could be, Firm policy.

Please pay attention to the subject of the thread.

would this still be a social dilemma, in That case?

it should be about That, not This.

 

[hadit]

A fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage and unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed, could do more to engender more cost effective management opportunities for the private sector.

More motivated Labor will look for work, less motivated Labor won't. The employer benefits from a more motivated, ready reserve Labor force.

A horrible Boss who knows how to achieve Profit, really should able proclaim His or Her own Firm, His or Her rules.

Practice makes Perfect, could be, Firm policy.

Please pay attention to the subject of the thread.

would this still be a social dilemma, in That case?

it should be about That, not This.

No. You're way off topic and trying to highjack the thread. Don't do that.

 

[Slade3200]

So you think she made this whole thing up? Planted the story in therapy 6 years ago and then trained on how to pass a polygraph just in case he got nominated to the Supreme Court and is now using it to try and stop him?

Anita Hillwas brought in at the last minute to lie and so was this *****. Its the MO of the Left. She can't discuss the particulars because it didn't happen.

If she was brought in last minute to lie then rationalize the plan for me. Explain the therapy notes from 6 years ago and explain why she decided to implicate two boys instead of just Kavanaugh

 

[Slade3200]

She was talking to a reporter about a personal event. Who the hell knows, nerves, being flustered, a hundred different reason to explain the sentence. My point is you are stretching. I’m not saying we need to believe it all on blind faith but I’m am saying that your judgements are premature

She can’t remember the DAMN YEAR a LIFE ALTERING EVENT HAPPEND?

I’m sorry, that would be ingrained in your mind.

I could see not remembering an exact date, and less so the month, BUT THE YEAR?

This is simple nonsense.

Summer of 1982 genius. Pay better attention

“Believed it to be the summer of 1982”

We need no more of your idiocy.

Yeah, that’s the line from the article. What’s your point?

That she can’t remember the year dingbat.

Spelled it out for you AGAIN. But you will make the same idiotic statement again, won’t you?

You mean the statement that you are being presumptive. Yes I’m makkng that claim cause it’s true

 

[Slade3200]

Really? Summer 1982 when she was 15... you didn’t get the memo?

Please provide your proof... Even her therapist was unable to ascertain this information... All she could narrow it to was a three year period.

I don’t have proof, I haven’t spoken to her or even heard her speak. I’ve read an article written by a reporter and a letter the accuser wrote to a congress woman. So there isn’t enough information to say for sure what she knows and doesn’t know. The article says she was 15 it was summer at the end of her sophomore year in 1982. That’s all I’ve seen so far. You all who try and discredit her for not knowing the year are full of shit with that talking point.

Your an idiot. I investigated crimes for many years and this woman hasn't a leg to stand on.

You keep repeating conjecture in the hopes that it will take hold and people will believe your bull shit.. My training and experience tell me this woman is a liar. Take your bull shit elsewhere..

Ok Mr Investigator. Let’s go off your conclusion that she is lying. Humor me and answer 3 simple questions.

1. If she was making up this accusation, why would she implicate Kav and his friend Judge and not just the guy she was going after? Adding the extra person only makes the lie tougher to make stick

The three people Ford has named have either given written depositions that the event never happened or stated that they have no knowledge of any event. Even her therapist was NEVER given names, locations, or credible dates and these are documented in her contemporaneous notes.

That alone discredits her testimony so severely that she has no credibility. Then we take the notes in her year book about the numerous parties she attended and became black out drunk (of her own will) while parents were gone and you have a total destruction of all credibility.

She is NOT credible on any level.. A first year attorney could get this case thrown out in about 30 seconds..

Why can’t you just answer the question? I didn’t ask about what the accused have said... I asked why she would implicate two boys when that makes the lie that much harder to stick.... tell me Mr Investigator, if this story is made up then why would she do that?

 

[Pop23]

She can’t remember the DAMN YEAR a LIFE ALTERING EVENT HAPPEND?

I’m sorry, that would be ingrained in your mind.

I could see not remembering an exact date, and less so the month, BUT THE YEAR?

This is simple nonsense.

Summer of 1982 genius. Pay better attention

“Believed it to be the summer of 1982”

We need no more of your idiocy.

Yeah, that’s the line from the article. What’s your point?

That she can’t remember the year dingbat.

Spelled it out for you AGAIN. But you will make the same idiotic statement again, won’t you?

You mean the statement that you are being presumptive. Yes I’m makkng that claim cause it’s true

Here we go again:

“Believed it to be the summer of 1982”

That means she can't CONFIRM the year dork