Do you agree with Obama?

[irosie91]

I think that words coming from State Leadership matter more than weirdo internet tough guys who think their tough guy words matter.

Seems pretty mature/reasonable to me to keep that card in our pocket because it makes it harder for Radicals to brainwash their Youth against us, as it gives them one less thing to point to.

Also, like he said, his Military Commanders were never held back from completing any actual tasks based on this whine, "call it radical Islam!"

Taking the toy(the name of Islam) away from the rotten baby (Terrorists) seems like a good ******* annoyance we present to our enemies.

Unless, of course, someone is going to present the case that this tiny % speaks for a Religion of over one billion folks(lol!), do you even KNOW what that kind if world would look like, you mother ******* jack asses?

This is just another reiteration of the ceaseless RECRUITMENT THEORY. That if we offend Muslims around the world then ISIS and other jihadists will recruit more jihadists. Obama and Hillary both pounced on this, and threw the word RECRUIT around yesterday, like it was going out of style.

There are a few rather strong arguments to be made against this recruitment theory however. It is not conclusive with any evidence that banning Muslim immigration to the US would have any effect on jihadist recruitment. Secondly, it is possible that it could work to just the opposite of that. Already, millions of people who call themselves Muslims are that in name only. They don't subscribe to the mass genocide commands so common in the Koran, don't engage in wife-beating, pedophilia, or other trashy things in that vile book of hate.

As such, those millions of Muslims probably understand quite well why the US would have a ban on Muslim immigration, and they might wish there were less Muslims in their own countries as well. As for those who agree with the Koran's trash (or at least they PUBLICLY) say they do, they are not being recruited to what they already are hooked up to anyway.

Third, how hypocritical of our US govt to talk about recruitment of jihadists, when it has sent our FBI out to jihadist groups, doing just that. Talk about "RECRUITMENT", check out this doozy. FBI director Robert Mueller launched a national hiring blitz that included setting up recruitment booths at ISNA conventions. ISNA (Islamic Society of N. America) is the largest and most powerful of all the many Muslim Brotherhood front organizations in America. They are known as the "nucleus". They also tried to recruit ISNA jihadists into the FBI, by placing full-page recruiting ads in ISNA's magazine, Islamic Horizons.

That's right folks. "Our" FBI recruited among Muslim Brotherthood fronts (all sworn to destroy America). They have claimed to be recruiting for Arabic speakers to be translators, and have also gone to jihadist mosques for recruits >> Example: the ADAMS Center (endorsed by CAIR, and singled out by the Freedom House as one of the top distributors of Saudi-sponsored anti-Semitic and anti-Christian dogma). All this going on while the FBI systematically rejects Jewish Arabic speakers for translator jobs, so as to not offend the Muslims already working there.

Needless to say, these Muslim Arabic translators, recruited from Muslim Brotherhood sources have been trouble, involved in numerous treasonous offenses, such as refusing to tape-record Muslim suspects, withholding relevant chatter, dispensing false information, and espionage, like the arrest of Nadia Prouty, for spying for Hezbollah

For our men out there-----the muzzies are LAUGHING AT YOU. I know because I have
interacted with---EDUCATED muslims for about 50 years of my life. If you are a Christian---you religion is FILTH----as are you. I got to know that fact because I is a jooos. If you ever meet up with muslims and want to know what is SAID about Christianity --by muslims-----SAY YOU ARE A JEW. Of course if you want to know what the party-line on jews is----say you are a Christian. Muslims from south east asia will likely take most of you as Christians so you will hear what FILTH is Hinduism

 

[G.T.]

No, they are sitting on their hands waiting for him to say "fully engage".

Obama is right... Our biggest ally in fighting racial Islam is moderate Islam...

Here's a clue. Any Muslim who is offended at identifying a Muslim who murders people as a "radical" ... is a radical ...

The point is not to be PC, the point is to take the excuse of using the banner of a Religion away from sick sadistic twits and leave them with just youre a sick sadistic twit.

And anyway, at the end of the day this is all arguing over minutia. It effects his Military Strategists ZERO.

So why the **** whine about it, is anyone's best guess.

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up

Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?

Yea well, Im sure youve all the classified intel of the joint chiefs in order to logically determine if you , and where you, disagree with any of the current strategies of the top brass.

if not, why are you so content with arguing about something you know for a fact that youre missing all of the classified intel on?

do you put 100pc puzzles together with only 25 pieces and argue that theyre done?

 

[Votto]

Here's a clue. Any Muslim who is offended at identifying a Muslim who murders people as a "radical" ... is a radical ...

The point is not to be PC, the point is to take the excuse of using the banner of a Religion away from sick sadistic twits and leave them with just youre a sick sadistic twit.

And anyway, at the end of the day this is all arguing over minutia. It effects his Military Strategists ZERO.

So why the **** whine about it, is anyone's best guess.

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up

Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?

No, that isn't what I said. You're another sad product of our government school system that your reading comprehension is so low. Sad you want to inflict what was done to you on your children.

At least you admitted what a patsy rube you are that you think it's just the government's job to protect you

This is a nice attack and all, but it really doesnt address your disconnect.

Obama has said that no military advisor has told him its stopping them from implementing any of their strategies because he doesnt say "radical islam."


On what planet does internet poster "kaz" negate that logistical fact?

I think Obama actually believes that he can avert terrorism by not saying the words radical Islamic extremism.

 

[kaz]

Here's a clue. Any Muslim who is offended at identifying a Muslim who murders people as a "radical" ... is a radical ...

The point is not to be PC, the point is to take the excuse of using the banner of a Religion away from sick sadistic twits and leave them with just youre a sick sadistic twit.

And anyway, at the end of the day this is all arguing over minutia. It effects his Military Strategists ZERO.

So why the **** whine about it, is anyone's best guess.

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up

Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?

No, that isn't what I said. You're another sad product of our government school system that your reading comprehension is so low. Sad you want to inflict what was done to you on your children.

At least you admitted what a patsy rube you are that you think it's just the government's job to protect you

This is a nice attack and all, but it really doesnt address your disconnect.

Obama has said that no military advisor has told him its stopping them from implementing any of their strategies because he doesnt say "radical islam."


On what planet does internet poster "kaz" negate that logistical fact?

I didn't, you still can't read. And in fact I explained it twice to you now. Have you considered going back for a GED?

 

[G.T.]

The point is not to be PC, the point is to take the excuse of using the banner of a Religion away from sick sadistic twits and leave them with just youre a sick sadistic twit.

And anyway, at the end of the day this is all arguing over minutia. It effects his Military Strategists ZERO.

So why the **** whine about it, is anyone's best guess.

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up

Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?

No, that isn't what I said. You're another sad product of our government school system that your reading comprehension is so low. Sad you want to inflict what was done to you on your children.

At least you admitted what a patsy rube you are that you think it's just the government's job to protect you

This is a nice attack and all, but it really doesnt address your disconnect.

Obama has said that no military advisor has told him its stopping them from implementing any of their strategies because he doesnt say "radical islam."


On what planet does internet poster "kaz" negate that logistical fact?

I think Obama actually believes that he can avert terrorism by not saying the words radical Islamic extremism.

Yea well, hes intelligent enough to become president of the united states - and speak on these things for all of our judgment....


while you?


are you!

 

[G.T.]

The point is not to be PC, the point is to take the excuse of using the banner of a Religion away from sick sadistic twits and leave them with just youre a sick sadistic twit.

And anyway, at the end of the day this is all arguing over minutia. It effects his Military Strategists ZERO.

So why the **** whine about it, is anyone's best guess.

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up

Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?

No, that isn't what I said. You're another sad product of our government school system that your reading comprehension is so low. Sad you want to inflict what was done to you on your children.

At least you admitted what a patsy rube you are that you think it's just the government's job to protect you

This is a nice attack and all, but it really doesnt address your disconnect.

Obama has said that no military advisor has told him its stopping them from implementing any of their strategies because he doesnt say "radical islam."


On what planet does internet poster "kaz" negate that logistical fact?

I didn't, you still can't read. And in fact I explained it twice to you now. Have you considered going back for a GED?

Whatever, bye then I dont like arguing with dipshits.

 

[kaz]

The point is not to be PC, the point is to take the excuse of using the banner of a Religion away from sick sadistic twits and leave them with just youre a sick sadistic twit.

And anyway, at the end of the day this is all arguing over minutia. It effects his Military Strategists ZERO.

So why the **** whine about it, is anyone's best guess.

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up

Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?

No, that isn't what I said. You're another sad product of our government school system that your reading comprehension is so low. Sad you want to inflict what was done to you on your children.

At least you admitted what a patsy rube you are that you think it's just the government's job to protect you

This is a nice attack and all, but it really doesnt address your disconnect.

Obama has said that no military advisor has told him its stopping them from implementing any of their strategies because he doesnt say "radical islam."


On what planet does internet poster "kaz" negate that logistical fact?

I think Obama actually believes that he can avert terrorism by not saying the words radical Islamic extremism.

I think Obama's just trying to deflect from that he has an incoherent, inconsistent, limited policy on terrorism. If he clearly identified the enemy, he would have to clearly fight it. And he doesn't want to

 

[irosie91]

Obama is right... Our biggest ally in fighting racial Islam is moderate Islam...

Here's a clue. Any Muslim who is offended at identifying a Muslim who murders people as a "radical" ... is a radical ...

I do not accept the use of the term RADICAL MUSLIM-------read the koran----what you call
RADICAL MUSLIM is called SHAHID----which is something like ----MARTYRED SAINT

 

[kaz]

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up

Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?

No, that isn't what I said. You're another sad product of our government school system that your reading comprehension is so low. Sad you want to inflict what was done to you on your children.

At least you admitted what a patsy rube you are that you think it's just the government's job to protect you

This is a nice attack and all, but it really doesnt address your disconnect.

Obama has said that no military advisor has told him its stopping them from implementing any of their strategies because he doesnt say "radical islam."


On what planet does internet poster "kaz" negate that logistical fact?

I think Obama actually believes that he can avert terrorism by not saying the words radical Islamic extremism.

Yea well, hes intelligent enough to become president of the united states - and speak on these things for all of our judgment....


while you?


are you!

The hypocrisy of that one has to have even set your ass flamingly on fire ...

 

[BlindBoo]

I agree with some and disagree with others.

For example I agree with this statement.

"There has not been a moment in my seven and a half years as president where we have not able to pursue a strategy because we didn't use the label "radical Islam." Not once has an adviser of mine said, "Man, if we really use that phrase, we're going to turn this whole thing around." Not once.

So if someone seriously thinks that we don't know who we're fighting, if there is anyone out there who thinks we're confused about who our enemies are -- that would come as a surprise to the thousands of terrorists who we've taken off the battlefield."

I don't really agree with this part however. I don't think the terrorist give a rats ass what we call them, and the other Muslims who are not radicalized know exactly who the West is talking about when we use terms like "Radical Islamic Terrorist".

"They want us to validate them by implying that they speak for those billion-plus people, that they speak for Islam."

President Obama’s remarks on ‘radical Islam’ after Orlando shooting

 

[depotoo]

GT, you don't have a clue here..

No, they are sitting on their hands waiting for him to say "fully engage".

Here's a clue. Any Muslim who is offended at identifying a Muslim who murders people as a "radical" ... is a radical ...

The point is not to be PC, the point is to take the excuse of using the banner of a Religion away from sick sadistic twits and leave them with just youre a sick sadistic twit.

And anyway, at the end of the day this is all arguing over minutia. It effects his Military Strategists ZERO.

So why the **** whine about it, is anyone's best guess.

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up

Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?

Yea well, Im sure youve all the classified intel of the joint chiefs in order to logically determine if you , and where you, disagree with any of the current strategies of the top brass.

if not, why are you so content with arguing about something you know for a fact that youre missing all of the classified intel on?

do you put 100pc puzzles together with only 25 pieces and argue that theyre done?

 

[irosie91]

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up

Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?

No, that isn't what I said. You're another sad product of our government school system that your reading comprehension is so low. Sad you want to inflict what was done to you on your children.

At least you admitted what a patsy rube you are that you think it's just the government's job to protect you

This is a nice attack and all, but it really doesnt address your disconnect.

Obama has said that no military advisor has told him its stopping them from implementing any of their strategies because he doesnt say "radical islam."


On what planet does internet poster "kaz" negate that logistical fact?

I think Obama actually believes that he can avert terrorism by not saying the words radical Islamic extremism.

I think Obama's just trying to deflect from that he has an incoherent, inconsistent, limited policy on terrorism. If he clearly identified the enemy, he would have to clearly fight it. And he doesn't want to

we stopped having clearly defined enemies
in the sixties

 

[kaz]

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up

Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?

No, that isn't what I said. You're another sad product of our government school system that your reading comprehension is so low. Sad you want to inflict what was done to you on your children.

At least you admitted what a patsy rube you are that you think it's just the government's job to protect you

This is a nice attack and all, but it really doesnt address your disconnect.

Obama has said that no military advisor has told him its stopping them from implementing any of their strategies because he doesnt say "radical islam."


On what planet does internet poster "kaz" negate that logistical fact?

I didn't, you still can't read. And in fact I explained it twice to you now. Have you considered going back for a GED?

Whatever, bye then I dont like arguing with dipshits.

All you said is that Obama says the military says whether he says the words "radical Islam" doesn't effect their tactical decisions.

I said sure, but it does effect that his overall policy is lame and weak and it deflects from public support to combat the real enemy. Every time there's a shooting, everyone is trying to find the name of the shooter to determine if it's another Muslim who did the attack or not, and it usually is.

Then you keep coming back and saying I'm saying Obama's wrong! No, I didn't say it effects the military's tactical decisions. I said that's not the issue. Which you in round after round don't grasp

 

[G.T.]

Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?

No, that isn't what I said. You're another sad product of our government school system that your reading comprehension is so low. Sad you want to inflict what was done to you on your children.

At least you admitted what a patsy rube you are that you think it's just the government's job to protect you

This is a nice attack and all, but it really doesnt address your disconnect.

Obama has said that no military advisor has told him its stopping them from implementing any of their strategies because he doesnt say "radical islam."


On what planet does internet poster "kaz" negate that logistical fact?

I think Obama actually believes that he can avert terrorism by not saying the words radical Islamic extremism.

Yea well, hes intelligent enough to become president of the united states - and speak on these things for all of our judgment....


while you?


are you!

The hypocrisy of that one has to have even set your ass flamingly on fire ...

No, I just think youre dumb. Sorry.

 

[kaz]

No, that isn't what I said. You're another sad product of our government school system that your reading comprehension is so low. Sad you want to inflict what was done to you on your children.

At least you admitted what a patsy rube you are that you think it's just the government's job to protect you

This is a nice attack and all, but it really doesnt address your disconnect.

Obama has said that no military advisor has told him its stopping them from implementing any of their strategies because he doesnt say "radical islam."


On what planet does internet poster "kaz" negate that logistical fact?

I think Obama actually believes that he can avert terrorism by not saying the words radical Islamic extremism.

Yea well, hes intelligent enough to become president of the united states - and speak on these things for all of our judgment....


while you?


are you!

The hypocrisy of that one has to have even set your ass flamingly on fire ...

No, I just think youre dumb. Sorry.

You think Obama saying his not saying "radical Islam" doesn't effect the military's tactical decisions, and conclude that means that there is no impact, and you say you think I'm dumb?

That's far more humorous than insulting ...

 

[G.T.]

GT, you don't have a clue here..

No, they are sitting on their hands waiting for him to say "fully engage".

The point is not to be PC, the point is to take the excuse of using the banner of a Religion away from sick sadistic twits and leave them with just youre a sick sadistic twit.

And anyway, at the end of the day this is all arguing over minutia. It effects his Military Strategists ZERO.

So why the **** whine about it, is anyone's best guess.

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up

Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?

Yea well, Im sure youve all the classified intel of the joint chiefs in order to logically determine if you , and where you, disagree with any of the current strategies of the top brass.

if not, why are you so content with arguing about something you know for a fact that youre missing all of the classified intel on?

do you put 100pc puzzles together with only 25 pieces and argue that theyre done?

Thats nice and all, you, userhandle "depotoo" are still playing sideseat quarterback without a single bit of a ******* clue what ANY classified intel, what ANY Military advisor says at the daily briefings, etc...


And think you somehow have an informed opinion.




Thats an ego thing, not an intelligence thing.

 

[G.T.]

I agree with some and disagree with others.

For example I agree with this statement.

"There has not been a moment in my seven and a half years as president where we have not able to pursue a strategy because we didn't use the label "radical Islam." Not once has an adviser of mine said, "Man, if we really use that phrase, we're going to turn this whole thing around." Not once.

So if someone seriously thinks that we don't know who we're fighting, if there is anyone out there who thinks we're confused about who our enemies are -- that would come as a surprise to the thousands of terrorists who we've taken off the battlefield."

I don't really agree with this part however. I don't think the terrorist give a rats ass what we call them, and the other Muslims who are not radicalized know exactly who the West is talking about when we use terms like "Radical Islamic Terrorist".

"They want us to validate them by implying that they speak for those billion-plus people, that they speak for Islam."

President Obama’s remarks on ‘radical Islam’ after Orlando shooting

kaz, obama refuted you in these 1st two paragraphs...

and unfortunately for your ego and all, you dont have the security clearance to refute him


so, keep farting into the wind and calling it information all youd like.......its just your ego, I assure you.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Obama says,

"We are not at war with Islam. We are at war with people who have perverted Islam,"

What part of that do you disagree with?

I disagree with ALL of it. The terrorists have NOT perverted Islam. They are carrying out the commands of the Koran. They are true Islam, not a perversion of it. Until this is understood by everyone and dealt with accordingly, jihad violence will continue unabated.

See? Exactly as I pointed out yesterday. There is widespread condemnation of Islam itself, entirely,

in exactly the way the Nazis condemned Judaism.

 

[kaz]

GT, you don't have a clue here..

No, they are sitting on their hands waiting for him to say "fully engage".

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up

Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?

Yea well, Im sure youve all the classified intel of the joint chiefs in order to logically determine if you , and where you, disagree with any of the current strategies of the top brass.

if not, why are you so content with arguing about something you know for a fact that youre missing all of the classified intel on?

do you put 100pc puzzles together with only 25 pieces and argue that theyre done?

Thats nice and all, you, userhandle "depotoo" are still playing sideseat quarterback without a single bit of a ******* clue what ANY classified intel, what ANY Military advisor says at the daily briefings, etc...


And think you somehow have an informed opinion.




Thats an ego thing, not an intelligence thing.

Right, intelligence is thinking that a general saying not identifying the enemy doesn't affect his implementation of a lame, incoherent strategy somehow fixes that it's a lame, incoherent strategy ...

 

[chikenwing]

Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

Obama is right... Our biggest ally in fighting racial Islam is moderate Islam...

Now your ilk have no clue about this since, Racial Islam (as you call it ) was on its knees during 911... It was the NeoCons and GOP which has brought them where they are today..

Just Maggie Thatcher made the IRA grow exponentially in size by her stance in Northern Ireland (She was described as the IRA's biggest recruitment tool), Bush Jr was the biggest recruitment tool for Radical Islam in the ME...

Trump is another clueless idiot in this...

The thing is, you keep on forgetting what ISIS want, so you keep on giving them their wish...

Trump is actually trying to surrender ground to ISIS, he is doing things that make them stronger, larger and bigger problem...
Well done surrender monkeys...

Almost 8 years,yet still its the other guy,and now your trying to blame Trump,he has nothing to do with ,he isn't part of any government .

You people are truly hopeless.