Do you agree with Obama?

[Soggy in NOLA]

Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

Obama says,

"We are not at war with Islam. We are at war with people who have perverted Islam,"

What part of that do you disagree with?

I get that he doesn't want to use the word Islam, but I don't see why he can't refer to them as terrorists who pervert Islam.

That will not satisfy the Trumpeters who want to believe Islam itself is the enemy, but ... who cares.

No one thinks Islam is the enemy.. that s why we use the term radical Islam. That is the whole point.

 

[G.T.]

Thats nice and all, you, userhandle "depotoo" are still playing sideseat quarterback without a single bit of a ******* clue what ANY classified intel, what ANY Military advisor says at the daily briefings, etc...


And think you somehow have an informed opinion.




Thats an ego thing, not an intelligence thing.

Right, intelligence is thinking that a general saying not identifying the enemy doesn't affect his implementation of a lame, incoherent strategy somehow fixes that it's a lame, incoherent strategy ...

Id like to point out - albeit youre unable to absorb it because you dont seem all that bright......


That the "headline" that you know of, or "synopsis made public" of.......our "strategy," is not, in fact or in detail, our strategy.

Again, you dont have the security clearance to know what the **** is going on




but your ego allows you to be here criticizing that which youre ignorant of......while acting like youre saying something.


Youre not.

Youve no clue.

Theres a reason you dont, as well.

So all you have is baa, government will inform you what it wants you to know when it wants you to know it ...

And again, the hyperbolic hypocrisy after W ...

Umm, all I have is the reality that you dont have a security clearance, thus dont have the first ******* clue, yet you feel the need to blather your criticisms regardless of that ignorance.

Dont worry, its normal. A lot of ppl are just as bright as you are.

Funny, I've never seen you say that to a liberal. You don't have a security clearance! You can't have an opinion!

You know, say on WMD's? How can you even sit right now with the ass flaming hypocrisy you're spewing?

And wow, what a government suckler ...

Huh?

Im not responsible for whatever t.f. youre talking about. I walk on my own 2, not with a group.

I RARELY even post up here. jeebus

 

[depotoo]

I will not condemn all muslims, as those that are not a practicing muslim can still be identified as a 'muslim'. The key is whether one is an adherent to Islam.
Do I feel there is a tiny fraction of a percentage that are trying to move into the 21st century way of thinking? Yes. Unfortunately, it is relatively insignificant.

Obama is right... Our biggest ally in fighting racial Islam is moderate Islam...

Here's a clue. Any Muslim who is offended at identifying a Muslim who murders people as a "radical" ... is a radical ...

I do not accept the use of the term RADICAL MUSLIM-------read the koran----what you call
RADICAL MUSLIM is called SHAHID----which is something like ----MARTYRED SAINT

 

[irosie91]

Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

We should call it what it is: radical Islamist terrorism. Obama is afraid to.

nothing radical about it. Sober islamic scholars advocate FARTWAHS that are so horrific----that the AL AZHAR, FARTWAH page was taken off the internet more than ten years ago. ------Al Azhar University contains the islamic scholars that are considered absolutely authorative in ISLAMIC LAW----by most muslims of the world. Their pronouncements legalize bomb on ass sluts who murder children for ALLAH ----In fact their pronouncements legalize islamic terrorism on the level done last week in ORLANDO

 

[G.T.]

Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

He is not right. No one is condemning Islam, only radical Islam. The fact that he can't/won't make that distinction is disturbing.

Disturbing on what level?

that he wont attack them? nope, the bodies kind of kill that notion.

that he....wont call them names? (lol).....he calls them terrorists, hes constantly referred to them as cowards, i mean.......whats disturbing really is this quibbling over minutia in any adult narrative - when theres ACTUALLY no realized reason to do so (quibble over this smallbrain shit)

 

[bendog]

Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

He is not right. No one is condemning Islam, only radical Islam. The fact that he can't/won't make that distinction is disturbing.

Trump

 

[irosie91]

I will not condemn all muslims, as those that are not a practicing muslim can still be identified as a 'muslim'. The key is whether one is an adherent to Islam.

Obama is right... Our biggest ally in fighting racial Islam is moderate Islam...

Here's a clue. Any Muslim who is offended at identifying a Muslim who murders people as a "radical" ... is a radical ...

I do not accept the use of the term RADICAL MUSLIM-------read the koran----what you call
RADICAL MUSLIM is called SHAHID----which is something like ----MARTYRED SAINT

well----I would not condemn even ALL adherent muslims-----really----not all BUY
into spread the word by force----BS----
there are even whole sects that contain ideologues that reject the idea----
BUT when it comes down to brass tacks---the
MAJORITY buy into that which the preachers preach------and it is very horrific. Up in "them thar hills"-----there are fire and brimstone preachers of the protestant flavor who also PLAY WITH HEADS of significant swaths of people

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

He is not right. No one is condemning Islam, only radical Islam. The fact that he can't/won't make that distinction is disturbing.

Disturbing on what level?

that he wont attack them? nope, the bodies kind of kill that notion.

that he....wont call them names? (lol).....he calls them terrorists, hes constantly referred to them as cowards, i mean.......whats disturbing really is this quibbling over minutia in any adult narrative - when theres ACTUALLY no realized reason to do so (quibble over this smallbrain shit)

It isn't about "name calling". It's about a grown man, our CiC who can't/won't even acknowledge who the enemy is. He can't bring himself to even mention Islam and terror in the same sentence. Granted, not all Muslims are terrorists, but is most certain that today, almost all terrorists are adherents of radical Islam. And Barry the dipshit can't even bring himself to mention that fact.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

He is not right. No one is condemning Islam, only radical Islam. The fact that he can't/won't make that distinction is disturbing.

Trump

What?

 

[depotoo]

Unfortunately, you were ,posting as I was adding an addendum. We agree. Here it is-
Do I feel there is a tiny fraction of a percentage that are trying to move into the 21st century way of thinking? Yes. Unfortunately, it is relatively insignificant.

..
But remember that most that won't engage themselves, believe in and rejoice when those that will do. Mostly in private.

I will not condemn all muslims, as those that are not a practicing muslim can still be identified as a 'muslim'. The key is whether one is an adherent to Islam.

Obama is right... Our biggest ally in fighting racial Islam is moderate Islam...

Here's a clue. Any Muslim who is offended at identifying a Muslim who murders people as a "radical" ... is a radical ...

I do not accept the use of the term RADICAL MUSLIM-------read the koran----what you call
RADICAL MUSLIM is called SHAHID----which is something like ----MARTYRED SAINT

well----I would not condemn even ALL adherent muslims-----really----not all BUY
into spread the word by force----BS----
there are even whole sects that contain ideologues that reject the idea----
BUT when it comes down to brass tacks---the
MAJORITY buy into that which the preachers preach------and it is very horrific. Up in "them thar hills"-----there are fire and brimstone preachers of the protestant flavor who also PLAY WITH HEADS of significant swaths of people

 

[G.T.]

Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

He is not right. No one is condemning Islam, only radical Islam. The fact that he can't/won't make that distinction is disturbing.

Disturbing on what level?

that he wont attack them? nope, the bodies kind of kill that notion.

that he....wont call them names? (lol).....he calls them terrorists, hes constantly referred to them as cowards, i mean.......whats disturbing really is this quibbling over minutia in any adult narrative - when theres ACTUALLY no realized reason to do so (quibble over this smallbrain shit)

It isn't about "name calling". It's about a grown man, our CiC who can't/won't even acknowledge who the enemy is. He can't bring himself to even mention Islam and terror in the same sentence. Granted, not all Muslims are terrorists, but is most certain that today, almost all terrorists are adherents of radical Islam. And Barry the dipshit can't even bring himself to mention that fact.

He can bring himself to.do.it.
what do you mean he wont identify the enemy?

he says isis, isil, al quada, terrorist, coward....



its not HIM quibbling over what to call them.



its yall.


yall want him to say the religions name, specifically, when he has told you EXACTLY why he doesnt



he will not allow them to pervert the entire religion by hiding under its banner



you may disagree, and cool.....but to say it somehow means he is coddling anybody..
..or not identifying anybody....

or that it alters our strategy for the worse...



Dude, thats all hodge podge political hyperbole that doesnt really mean anything

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

No t o mention Barry the dummy had no problem talking about "committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ."

Not sure what the **** this guy means... but still.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

He is not right. No one is condemning Islam, only radical Islam. The fact that he can't/won't make that distinction is disturbing.

Disturbing on what level?

that he wont attack them? nope, the bodies kind of kill that notion.

that he....wont call them names? (lol).....he calls them terrorists, hes constantly referred to them as cowards, i mean.......whats disturbing really is this quibbling over minutia in any adult narrative - when theres ACTUALLY no realized reason to do so (quibble over this smallbrain shit)

It isn't about "name calling". It's about a grown man, our CiC who can't/won't even acknowledge who the enemy is. He can't bring himself to even mention Islam and terror in the same sentence. Granted, not all Muslims are terrorists, but is most certain that today, almost all terrorists are adherents of radical Islam. And Barry the dipshit can't even bring himself to mention that fact.

He can bring himself to.do.it.
what do you mean he wont identify the enemy?

he says isis, isil, al quada, terrorist, coward....



its not HIM quibbling over what to call them.



its yall.


yall want him to say the religions name, specifically, when he has told you EXACTLY why he doesnt



he will not allow them to pervert the entire religion by hiding under its banner



you may disagree, and cool.....but to say it somehow means he is coddling anybody..
..or not identifying anybody....

or that it alters our strategy for the worse...



Dude, thats all hodge podge political hyperbole that doesnt really mean anything

I never said he is coddling anyone. Hardly the point.

 

[G.T.]

No t o mention Barry the dummy had no problem talking about "committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ."

Not sure what the **** this guy means... but still.

He means that just because they use the banner of religion to commit terrible acts, doesnt mean we let them get to use that as an excuse.

Its really not that brilliant to not understand where that narrative is coming from.

Disagree with policies and shit, thats all understandable.

The not tough on terror and arguing over what he says in an address when a drone is killin 20of these ***** out in the real world? Is such babyish bullshit.

 

[bendog]

Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

He is not right. No one is condemning Islam, only radical Islam. The fact that he can't/won't make that distinction is disturbing.

Disturbing on what level?

that he wont attack them? nope, the bodies kind of kill that notion.

that he....wont call them names? (lol).....he calls them terrorists, hes constantly referred to them as cowards, i mean.......whats disturbing really is this quibbling over minutia in any adult narrative - when theres ACTUALLY no realized reason to do so (quibble over this smallbrain shit)

It isn't about "name calling". It's about a grown man, our CiC who can't/won't even acknowledge who the enemy is. He can't bring himself to even mention Islam and terror in the same sentence. Granted, not all Muslims are terrorists, but is most certain that today, almost all terrorists are adherents of radical Islam. And Barry the dipshit can't even bring himself to mention that fact.

He can bring himself to.do.it.
what do you mean he wont identify the enemy?

he says isis, isil, al quada, terrorist, coward....



its not HIM quibbling over what to call them.



its yall.


yall want him to say the religions name, specifically, when he has told you EXACTLY why he doesnt



he will not allow them to pervert the entire religion by hiding under its banner



you may disagree, and cool.....but to say it somehow means he is coddling anybody..
..or not identifying anybody....

or that it alters our strategy for the worse...



Dude, thats all hodge podge political hyperbole that doesnt really mean anything

Look at Dean's post about "Christian pastors wishing more gay people were killed." I have no idea if anyone actually said they wished more were dead, but I think we'd all agree that anyone espousing that hate is not a Christian. Saying "radical Islam" literally means the radicals have some actual view of Islam. They don't.

But it's all a distraction. The Trumpeters have to view this as some war concerning Islam against us. It's not.

 

[irosie91]

Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

Obama says,

"We are not at war with Islam. We are at war with people who have perverted Islam,"

What part of that do you disagree with?

I get that he doesn't want to use the word Islam, but I don't see why he can't refer to them as terrorists who pervert Islam.

That will not satisfy the Trumpeters who want to believe Islam itself is the enemy, but ... who cares.

No one thinks Islam is the enemy.. that s why we use the term radical Islam. That is the whole point.

it's a silly moniker------is there a RADICAL CHRISTIANITY that accounts for serial murderers and which ----BUILDS MONUMENTS TO THOSE SAINTS WHO MURDER BABIES FOR CHRIST?

 

[TooTall]

Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

Obama says,

"We are not at war with Islam. We are at war with people who have perverted Islam,"

What part of that do you disagree with?

I totally agree with that statement.
Just as the different denominations of Christians have differing interpretations of the Bible, there are differing views of the Koran by a group of Muslims referred to as ISIS or ISIL. Those Muslims have chosen the words in the Koran that they need to kill all those that do not convert to Islam and are called radical Islamist terrorists by any reasonable person.

 

[G.T.]

Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

He is not right. No one is condemning Islam, only radical Islam. The fact that he can't/won't make that distinction is disturbing.

Disturbing on what level?

that he wont attack them? nope, the bodies kind of kill that notion.

that he....wont call them names? (lol).....he calls them terrorists, hes constantly referred to them as cowards, i mean.......whats disturbing really is this quibbling over minutia in any adult narrative - when theres ACTUALLY no realized reason to do so (quibble over this smallbrain shit)

It isn't about "name calling". It's about a grown man, our CiC who can't/won't even acknowledge who the enemy is. He can't bring himself to even mention Islam and terror in the same sentence. Granted, not all Muslims are terrorists, but is most certain that today, almost all terrorists are adherents of radical Islam. And Barry the dipshit can't even bring himself to mention that fact.

He can bring himself to.do.it.
what do you mean he wont identify the enemy?

he says isis, isil, al quada, terrorist, coward....



its not HIM quibbling over what to call them.



its yall.


yall want him to say the religions name, specifically, when he has told you EXACTLY why he doesnt



he will not allow them to pervert the entire religion by hiding under its banner



you may disagree, and cool.....but to say it somehow means he is coddling anybody..
..or not identifying anybody....

or that it alters our strategy for the worse...



Dude, thats all hodge podge political hyperbole that doesnt really mean anything

Look at Dean's post about "Christian pastors wishing more gay people were killed." I have no idea if anyone actually said they wished more were dead, but I think we'd all agree that anyone espousing that hate is not a Christian. Saying "radical Islam" literally means the radicals have some actual view of Islam. They don't.

But it's all a distraction. The Trumpeters have to view this as some war concerning Islam against us. It's not.

Its basically the Presidents way of not only engaging the war with might by using our military.....

but also engaging in the war of ideas. Hes got the microphone, and they want to speak for islam, and he is saying....no, **** you.

 

[bendog]

Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

Obama says,

"We are not at war with Islam. We are at war with people who have perverted Islam,"

What part of that do you disagree with?

I get that he doesn't want to use the word Islam, but I don't see why he can't refer to them as terrorists who pervert Islam.

That will not satisfy the Trumpeters who want to believe Islam itself is the enemy, but ... who cares.

No one thinks Islam is the enemy.. that s why we use the term radical Islam. That is the whole point.

it's a silly moniker------is there a RADICAL CHRISTIANITY that accounts for serial murderers and which ----BUILDS MONUMENTS TO THOSE SAINTS WHO MURDER BABIES FOR CHRIST?

You see, Soggy?

 

[TooTall]

Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

Obama says,

"We are not at war with Islam. We are at war with people who have perverted Islam,"

What part of that do you disagree with?

I get that he doesn't want to use the word Islam, but I don't see why he can't refer to them as terrorists who pervert Islam.

That will not satisfy the Trumpeters who want to believe Islam itself is the enemy, but ... who cares.

No one thinks Islam is the enemy.. that s why we use the term radical Islam. That is the whole point.

it's a silly moniker------is there a RADICAL CHRISTIANITY that accounts for serial murderers and which ----BUILDS MONUMENTS TO THOSE SAINTS WHO MURDER BABIES FOR CHRIST?

Where can I see one of these monuments?