Do you agree with Obama?

I think that words coming from State Leadership matter more than weirdo internet tough guys who think their tough guy words matter.

Seems pretty mature/reasonable to me to keep that card in our pocket because it makes it harder for Radicals to brainwash their Youth against us, as it gives them one less thing to point to.

Also, like he said, his Military Commanders were never held back from completing any actual tasks based on this whine, "call it radical Islam!"

Taking the toy(the name of Islam) away from the rotten baby (Terrorists) seems like a good ******* annoyance we present to our enemies.

Unless, of course, someone is going to present the case that this tiny % speaks for a Religion of over one billion folks(lol!), do you even KNOW what that kind if world would look like, you mother ******* jack asses?
This is just another reiteration of the ceaseless RECRUITMENT THEORY. That if we offend Muslims around the world then ISIS and other jihadists will recruit more jihadists. Obama and Hillary both pounced on this, and threw the word RECRUIT around yesterday, like it was going out of style.

There are a few rather strong arguments to be made against this recruitment theory however. It is not conclusive with any evidence that banning Muslim immigration to the US would have any effect on jihadist recruitment. Secondly, it is possible that it could work to just the opposite of that. Already, millions of people who call themselves Muslims are that in name only. They don't subscribe to the mass genocide commands so common in the Koran, don't engage in wife-beating, pedophilia, or other trashy things in that vile book of hate.

As such, those millions of Muslims probably understand quite well why the US would have a ban on Muslim immigration, and they might wish there were less Muslims in their own countries as well. As for those who agree with the Koran's trash (or at least they PUBLICLY) say they do, they are not being recruited to what they already are hooked up to anyway.

Third, how hypocritical of our US govt to talk about recruitment of jihadists, when it has sent our FBI out to jihadist groups, doing just that. Talk about "RECRUITMENT", check out this doozy. FBI director Robert Mueller launched a national hiring blitz that included setting up recruitment booths at ISNA conventions. ISNA (Islamic Society of N. America) is the largest and most powerful of all the many Muslim Brotherhood front organizations in America. They are known as the "nucleus". They also tried to recruit ISNA jihadists into the FBI, by placing full-page recruiting ads in ISNA's magazine, Islamic Horizons.

That's right folks. "Our" FBI recruited among Muslim Brotherthood fronts (all sworn to destroy America). They have claimed to be recruiting for Arabic speakers to be translators, and have also gone to jihadist mosques for recruits >> Example: the ADAMS Center (endorsed by CAIR, and singled out by the Freedom House as one of the top distributors of Saudi-sponsored anti-Semitic and anti-Christian dogma). All this going on while the FBI systematically rejects Jewish Arabic speakers for translator jobs, so as to not offend the Muslims already working there.

Needless to say, these Muslim Arabic translators, recruited from Muslim Brotherhood sources have been trouble, involved in numerous treasonous offenses, such as refusing to tape-record Muslim suspects, withholding relevant chatter, dispensing false information, and espionage, like the arrest of Nadia Prouty, for spying for Hezbollah
Theyre not GUESSING its a recruitment tactic.

Its DOCUMENTED that its a recruitment tactic.

In fact, you can sit your ass on the seat youre already on, and watch some recruitment videos yourself, and see for yourself.

Dont end you up on a watch list though :popcorn:
 
Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

Obama is full of shit. Same ol same ol
 
Obama is right... Our biggest ally in fighting racial Islam is moderate Islam...

Here's a clue. Any Muslim who is offended at identifying a Muslim who murders people as a "radical" ... is a radical ...
 
He also claimed we are winning this war. Yet the CIA director Brennan states just now, ISIS capability is not reduced, as he testifies.
"Despite all our progress against ISIL on the battlefield and in the financial realm, our efforts have not reduced the group's terrorism capability and global reach."
 
Obama is right... Our biggest ally in fighting racial Islam is moderate Islam...

Here's a clue. Any Muslim who is offended at identifying a Muslim who murders people as a "radical" ... is a radical ...
The point is not to be PC, the point is to take the excuse of using the banner of a Religion away from sick sadistic twits and leave them with just youre a sick sadistic twit.

And anyway, at the end of the day this is all arguing over minutia. It effects his Military Strategists ZERO.

So why the **** whine about it, is anyone's best guess.
 
I think that words coming from State Leadership matter more than weirdo internet tough guys who think their tough guy words matter.

Seems pretty mature/reasonable to me to keep that card in our pocket because it makes it harder for Radicals to brainwash their Youth against us, as it gives them one less thing to point to.

Also, like he said, his Military Commanders were never held back from completing any actual tasks based on this whine, "call it radical Islam!"

Taking the toy(the name of Islam) away from the rotten baby (Terrorists) seems like a good ******* annoyance we present to our enemies.

Unless, of course, someone is going to present the case that this tiny % speaks for a Religion of over one billion folks(lol!), do you even KNOW what that kind if world would look like, you mother ******* jack asses?
This is just another reiteration of the ceaseless RECRUITMENT THEORY. That if we offend Muslims around the world then ISIS and other jihadists will recruit more jihadists. Obama and Hillary both pounced on this, and threw the word RECRUIT around yesterday, like it was going out of style.

There are a few rather strong arguments to be made against this recruitment theory however. It is not conclusive with any evidence that banning Muslim immigration to the US would have any effect on jihadist recruitment. Secondly, it is possible that it could work to just the opposite of that. Already, millions of people who call themselves Muslims are that in name only. They don't subscribe to the mass genocide commands so common in the Koran, don't engage in wife-beating, pedophilia, or other trashy things in that vile book of hate.

As such, those millions of Muslims probably understand quite well why the US would have a ban on Muslim immigration, and they might wish there were less Muslims in their own countries as well. As for those who agree with the Koran's trash (or at least they PUBLICLY) say they do, they are not being recruited to what they already are hooked up to anyway.

Third, how hypocritical of our US govt to talk about recruitment of jihadists, when it has sent our FBI out to jihadist groups, doing just that. Talk about "RECRUITMENT", check out this doozy. FBI director Robert Mueller launched a national hiring blitz that included setting up recruitment booths at ISNA conventions. ISNA (Islamic Society of N. America) is the largest and most powerful of all the many Muslim Brotherhood front organizations in America. They are known as the "nucleus". They also tried to recruit ISNA jihadists into the FBI, by placing full-page recruiting ads in ISNA's magazine, Islamic Horizons.

That's right folks. "Our" FBI recruited among Muslim Brotherthood fronts (all sworn to destroy America). They have claimed to be recruiting for Arabic speakers to be translators, and have also gone to jihadist mosques for recruits >> Example: the ADAMS Center (endorsed by CAIR, and singled out by the Freedom House as one of the top distributors of Saudi-sponsored anti-Semitic and anti-Christian dogma). All this going on while the FBI systematically rejects Jewish Arabic speakers for translator jobs, so as to not offend the Muslims already working there.

Needless to say, these Muslim Arabic translators, recruited from Muslim Brotherhood sources have been trouble, involved in numerous treasonous offenses, such as refusing to tape-record Muslim suspects, withholding relevant chatter, dispensing false information, and espionage, like the arrest of Nadia Prouty, for spying for Hezbollah

Muslim are offended------they were offended long before WE WERE BORN. They were just as OFFENDED ---1400 years ago as they are now. In order to understand what it takes to OFFEND muslims ------learn some history AND speak to muslims. Muslims NEVER (No NEVER NEVER NEVER) fight any people who do not ATTACK FIRST. Most of us are from people who ATTACKED ISLAM AND MUSLIMS and, therefore----just targets of their just wrath. I learned it from reading the koran, knowing lots of people educated in muslim lands and attending mosques---MANY years ago (a very few times) Publication of a line drawing of a generic arab as a depiction of muhummad----
was A HUGE AND GROSS ATTACK ON ISLAM AND MUSLIMS AND A JUSTIFICATION FOR KILLING. Despite the fact that many people on this board will shoot me down for so saying------<<<<this is the
teaching of islam believed by the majority of 1.5 billion people-----
 
He also claimed we are winning this war. Yet the CIA director Brennan states just now, ISIS capability is not reduced, as he testifies.
"Despite all our progress against ISIL on the battlefield and in the financial realm, our efforts have not reduced the group's terrorism capability and global reach."

ISIL is the situation which the koran presents as THE ONLY RIGHT WAY FOR ALL OF THE WORLD-------read the book. It does not lie as to the nature of that which muslims BELIEVE
 
Obama is right... Our biggest ally in fighting racial Islam is moderate Islam...

Here's a clue. Any Muslim who is offended at identifying a Muslim who murders people as a "radical" ... is a radical ...
The point is not to be PC, the point is to take the excuse of using the banner of a Religion away from sick sadistic twits and leave them with just youre a sick sadistic twit.

And anyway, at the end of the day this is all arguing over minutia. It effects his Military Strategists ZERO.

So why the **** whine about it, is anyone's best guess.

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up
 
I know this. I lived down the block from a notorious mosque in north Texas.
He also claimed we are winning this war. Yet the CIA director Brennan states just now, ISIS capability is not reduced, as he testifies.
"Despite all our progress against ISIL on the battlefield and in the financial realm, our efforts have not reduced the group's terrorism capability and global reach."

ISIL is the situation which the koran presents as THE ONLY RIGHT WAY FOR ALL OF THE WORLD-------read the book. It does not lie as to the nature of that which muslims BELIEVE
 
People who believe women cannot be allowed to go to school or drive a car are Islamic Extremists, some maybe even violent. But that doesn't mean they had something to do with killing people or that we are at war with them.

I don't think there is anything to demands that the shootings be explicitly broad-brushed to Islam than basic bigotry. Middle east is socially and economically backward and how they practice religion is a reflection, not a cause of it. Just as Christianity and Judaism as they are practiced are not causes, but reflections of societies.
 
Last edited:
Obama is right... Our biggest ally in fighting racial Islam is moderate Islam...

Here's a clue. Any Muslim who is offended at identifying a Muslim who murders people as a "radical" ... is a radical ...
The point is not to be PC, the point is to take the excuse of using the banner of a Religion away from sick sadistic twits and leave them with just youre a sick sadistic twit.

And anyway, at the end of the day this is all arguing over minutia. It effects his Military Strategists ZERO.

So why the **** whine about it, is anyone's best guess.

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up
Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?
 
People who believe women cannot be allowed to go to school or drive a car are Islamic Extremists, some maybe even violent. But that doesn't mean they had something to do with killing people or that we are at war with them.
I agree with this.

Religions are the scourge of the Earth.
 
No, only those that refuse to live in the 21st century.
People who believe women cannot be allowed to go to school or drive a car are Islamic Extremists, some maybe even violent. But that doesn't mean they had something to do with killing people or that we are at war with them.
I agree with this.

Religions are the scourge of the Earth.
 
Obama is right... Our biggest ally in fighting racial Islam is moderate Islam...

Here's a clue. Any Muslim who is offended at identifying a Muslim who murders people as a "radical" ... is a radical ...
The point is not to be PC, the point is to take the excuse of using the banner of a Religion away from sick sadistic twits and leave them with just youre a sick sadistic twit.

And anyway, at the end of the day this is all arguing over minutia. It effects his Military Strategists ZERO.

So why the **** whine about it, is anyone's best guess.

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up
Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?

No, that isn't what I said. You're another sad product of our government school system that your reading comprehension is so low. Sad you want to inflict what was done to you on your children.

At least you admitted what a patsy rube you are that you think it's just the government's job to protect you
 
15th post
Brennan wants more control of the internet. Oh, boy.
 
Obama is right... Our biggest ally in fighting racial Islam is moderate Islam...

Here's a clue. Any Muslim who is offended at identifying a Muslim who murders people as a "radical" ... is a radical ...
The point is not to be PC, the point is to take the excuse of using the banner of a Religion away from sick sadistic twits and leave them with just youre a sick sadistic twit.

And anyway, at the end of the day this is all arguing over minutia. It effects his Military Strategists ZERO.

So why the **** whine about it, is anyone's best guess.

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up
Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?

No, that isn't what I said. You're another sad product of our government school system that your reading comprehension is so low. Sad you want to inflict what was done to you on your children.

At least you admitted what a patsy rube you are that you think it's just the government's job to protect you
This is a nice attack and all, but it really doesnt address your disconnect.

Obama has said that no military advisor has told him its stopping them from implementing any of their strategies because he doesnt say "radical islam."


On what planet does internet poster "kaz" negate that logistical fact?
 
No, they are sitting on their hands waiting for him to say "fully engage".
Obama is right... Our biggest ally in fighting racial Islam is moderate Islam...

Here's a clue. Any Muslim who is offended at identifying a Muslim who murders people as a "radical" ... is a radical ...
The point is not to be PC, the point is to take the excuse of using the banner of a Religion away from sick sadistic twits and leave them with just youre a sick sadistic twit.

And anyway, at the end of the day this is all arguing over minutia. It effects his Military Strategists ZERO.

So why the **** whine about it, is anyone's best guess.

Calm down, guy, didn't mean to make you so upset. When you are dodging who is responsible for the war, you aren't focused on the war, it clearly does reduce the effectiveness of the effort. It's totally important to specifically identify the enemy to defeat them. We aren't fighting all sick sadistic twits, we are fighting the Muslim ones. They are the ones killing people. And Obama has a clearly incoherent strategy to back that observation up
Are you meaning to say that the military is currently sitting on its hands waiting for obama to say "islam?"

you really dont think these things through, huh?
 
Obama explains why he doesn't use 'radical Islam'

President Obama recently answered criticisms from Trump that he never uses the words, "radical Islam", because he thinks it is a "distraction" that will create needless agitation towards those who practice Islam, even though that is what it is.

So is he right? Should we continue the PC charade of never saying "radical Islam"?

Obama says,

"We are not at war with Islam. We are at war with people who have perverted Islam,"

What part of that do you disagree with?

Why then can he not reference Islamic extremism, which sets it apart from other Muslims?

After all, he has no trouble saying right wing extremists, but then, he thinks that all those on the right are extremists.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom