Exposing How "Polite Pretense" Is Simply A Term For Deception

What you allow? :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:

The sad thing is that he is 100% correct. You just took something that Rubio said and conflated it with American Indians before the influence of the Europeans. They have nothing to do with one another.
I also abhor your sort of nonsense.
 
You're painting Native Americans as stone age savages, but that’s a huge oversimplification. Many societies were highly complex long before European settlers arrived. Cahokia had massive cities, advanced agriculture, and organized trade networks. Judging them by the presence of wheels or European technology misses the point. Progress isn’t one size fits all, and your standards are extremely Eurocentric.

The same goes for the rest of your post. Treating entire groups as monolithic problems is incompatible with logic.
Why are YOU referring to "groups" if you don't think they logically exist?
 
White man (European anyway) gave them the horse, guns and liquor.
And capitalism



Here, an example:

In his article “Towards a theory of property rights” Harold Demsetz shows by a historic example of the Montagnes Indians the impact of private property. It demonstrates the different behaviours in cases with and without private property rights, how private property solves negative externalities and the role of coordination by changing individuals’ behaviour.

The Montagnes Indians had no restrictions on hunting (=> open-access common property good).

… when the colonists started to acquire beaver furs from the Indians, the value of the beaver increased to such an extent, that the onset of intensification of hunting led to a decline in the beaver population (= negative externality).

Everyone hunted as much as he could and nobody cared about the sustainability of the beaver population. The benefit/revenue of each animal was individual for the hunter, but the costs of the stock decline had the community as a whole (= tragedy of the commons).

The Montagnes Indians successfully solved the problem by the allocation of individual territories on the families (= exactly defined property right), so that individual incentives appeared to plan for the long term under consideration of the beaver population. Consequently the negative externality was remedied and the individuals’ behavior purposely changed by property rights (Demsetz, 1967: 351 – 354).”
Property rights


Changes in knowledge result in changes in production functions, market values, and aspirations. Thanks to those white pioneers.
Did they teach that in government school?????
 
This is more idiocy.
 
1. The Rubio speech in Munich was simply amazing. He told Europe exactly what the the Trump view for the world is. Here is one quote:

"An alliance that does not allow its power to be outsourced, constrained, or subordinated to systems beyond its control; one that does not depend on others for the critical necessities of its national life; and one that does not maintain the polite pretense that our way of life is just one among many and that asks for permission before it acts."

He is saying that that Leftist lie about all cultures being equal for respect, is a danger and a detriment.



2. Central to the idea of Liberalism is the demand for everyone making up their own code of morality....and that there never be any criticism of same.
It is based on the Boas' view of all cultures being 'equal.'
"The roots of postmodernism can be traced to the anthropologist Franz Boas, who, in an effort to study exotic cultures without prejudice, found it useful to take the position that no culture is superior to any other. Thus was born the idea of cultural relativity.
The idea spread like wildfire through the universities, catapulted by the radical impetus of the sixties, ready and willing to reject "the universality of Western norms and principles."
Bawer, "The Victim's Revolution"



3. Both as a child and in university you were given a view of Indian' culture, that they were great stewards of the land. It is false: theirs was a savage stone age culture
While they did have fire, probably due to a confluence of natural events, they never developed even the simplest implements of mechanical advantage. The rest of the world did, thousands of years prior.

That simplest of ‘tools’???? The wheel.

“The invention of the wheel falls into the late Neolithic, and may be seen in conjunction with other technological advances that gave rise to the early Bronze Age. This implies the passage of several wheel-less millennia even after the invention of agriculture and of pottery, dtheuring the Aceramic Neolithic.

Two types of early Neolithic European wheel and axle are known; a circumalpine type of wagon construction (the wheel and axle rotate together, as in Ljubljana Marshes Wheel), and that of the Baden culture in Hungary (axle does not rotate). They both are dated to c. 3200–3000 BCE.
Wheel - Wikipedia

1592942955126.webp


See any wheels in this picture?

Any books?

hese were stone age savages, who had the sensibilities of savages.

They were 3 thousand years behind the civilization of the settlers.
These were stone age peoples, thousands of years behind the advancement of the settlers. They moved from one locale to another, using up resources, burning down entire forests, and slaughtering species to the point of extinction.....and each other.




4. Due to their need for the black vote, the Liberals will never criticize their culture, the very thing that restricts black advancement.
There is no racism in America, no white privilege. But there is two-parent privilege.



5. Of course the most dangerous pretense is that the culture of Islam has a place in America or Europe or any free society. It demands adherence to a strict primitive code, and keeps women in subjection, demands death for apostasy, and for those who refuse the submission (which is the name of Islam) to Islam.
Who began the lie that Islam is the religion of peace?


Rubio's brilliant speech demands trat the West adher to our civilization and culture, and stop pretending that any other culture meets the same support for mankind.
Like most MAGAs , you and Rubio's ethnocentric beliefs blinds you to the greatness and beauty of all the diverse cultures and people's of this world. They aren't problems , they are partners on our journey in this life.
 
Like most MAGAs , you and Rubio's ethnocentric beliefs blinds you to the greatness and beauty of all the diverse cultures and people's of this world. They aren't problems , they are partners on our journey in this life.
I believe in Western Civilization and the Bible that led to the greatness thereof.


See if you can find any quote of mine that suggests otherwise.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom