Do women have the right to guns in the US?

This is the whole essence of the difference between the right and the left order. In the right order, strength is the source of power; in the left order, strength is a puppet in the hands of the priesthood or swindlers, just as a man is in the hands of a bitch.
The left order is women order by nature
 
.

I don't have a problem who men who respect women.

I have a problem with men who only respect women when it suits their own concerns ...
Or when it establishes women as being subservient to men.

Cecilie was in the fight and can hold her own ...
I was just acknowledging the fact I didn't think she was asking for anything less than that.

.

I did not mean to imply differently. My apologies.
 
This is absolutely true and is confirmed by history. The right world always falls when merchants and swindlers appear. For example, the Royal Rome died under the onslaught of the plebeians.
 
This is the whole essence of the difference between the right and the left order. In the right order, strength is the source of power; in the left order, strength is a puppet in the hands of the priesthood or swindlers, just as a man is in the hands of a bitch.
The left order is women order by nature

Your version of the "right" is adolescent fantasies, nothing more.
 
I did not mean to imply differently. My apologies.
.

You didn't ... I was just emphasizing my initial comment in support of yours ... :auiqs.jpg:
In the meantime ... We can enjoy more of rupol's enlightening posts.

I am no expert, but I have a Bachelor of Science (which is rare in the field) in Psychology and he is a specimen worth examination.

.
 
.

You didn't ... I was just emphasizing my initial comment in support of yours ... :auiqs.jpg:
In the meantime ... We can enjoy more of rupol's enlightening posts.

I am no expert, but I have a Bachelor of Science (which is rare in the field) in Psychology and he is a specimen worth examination.

.

Get him to the US. There is a PhD thesis between that guys ears.
 
Your version of the "right" is adolescent fantasies, nothing more.
Only if you look from the standpoint of pseudo-conservative Europe of the left wing, like insignificant Prussianism, henpeckeds in knightly armor. Europeans don't know about the American right fucking at all, for them the right is a kind of communist. They conserve Prussianism and imperialism, something that the right anti-federalists, the fathers of the USA and Austria-Hungary, despised.

And that's where you look sucker. For you, the right is not Reagan, but the Trumpsters and the English Tories. You are the child of an autistic new wave of idiots.
 
This is absolutely true and is confirmed by history. The right world always falls when merchants and swindlers appear. For example, the Royal Rome died under the onslaught of the plebeians.
.

No it didn't ... Rome fell when it taxed its merchant class to a point it caused them to look for business elsewhere.
Then it could no longer support its military and was overrun.

.
 
.

No it didn't ... Rome fell when it taxed its merchant class to a point it caused them to look for business elsewhere.
Then it could no longer support its military and was overrun.

.
Rome had three phases. I'm talking about the fall of the first Patrician Rome, the second was the Republic, the third Empire (left Rome). The Huns of Attila finally killed Rome, that's another question.
 
Only if you look from the standpoint of pseudo-conservative Europe of the left wing, like insignificant Prussianism, henpeckeds in knightly armor. Europeans don't know about the American right fucking at all, for them the right is a kind of communist. They conserve Prussianism and imperialism, something that the right anti-federalists, the fathers of the USA and Austria-Hungary, despised.

And that's where you look sucker. For you, the right is not Reagan, but the Trumpsters and the English Tories. You are the child of an autistic new wave of idiots.

The Right is a set of basic concepts.

1) Individual Freedom
2) Smaller, less intrusive gov't
3) Lower taxes and Fiscal Responsibility
4) Rule of Law
5) Human Dignity
 
Rome had three phases. I'm talking about the fall of the first Patrician Rome, the second was the Republic, the third Empire (left Rome). The Huns of Attila finally killed Rome, that's another question.
.

I was talking about what led to the actual destruction of the Roman Empire ... :auiqs.jpg:
Literally and not Idealistically.

.
 
The Right is a set of basic concepts.

1) Individual Freedom
2) Smaller, less intrusive gov't
3) Lower taxes and Fiscal Responsibility
4) Rule of Law
5) Human Dignity
It can agreed as a superficial judgment, but this is not what you were talking about before this, moron.
 
I was talking about what led to the actual destruction of the Roman Empire
The Noble Huns killed the leftist slave-owning state of perverts, henpecked and cretins - that's the reason for its death.
 
It can agreed as a superficial judgment, but this is not what you were talking about before this, moron.

Oh spare me the attempted insults. You were the one trying to derail this thread over and over, posting things that had no relevance.

And given the drivel you have posted, I thought you needed educating on this topic like you did on the topic of INCELs.
 
Already at the beginning of the left period, it rotted

original.jpg
 
The Noble Huns killed the leftist slave-owning state of perverts, henpecked and cretins - that's the reason for its death.
.

The Huns destroyed what stood before them because they could not defend themselves from the onslaught.
The city of Rome was captured and looted by the Visigoths in 410 and the Vandals in 455.

Here's a clue Skippy ... This ain't the kiddie pool ... :auiqs.jpg:

.
 
The plebeians are leftists who shared power with the patricians during the period of the republic. Foreign traders and rabble, feminists and swindlers. They achieved the fall of the military aristocracy and rolled into an abomination. The Parthians despised them, they said that their miserable soldiers could not go on a campaign without pornography. They crushed them like a flock of sheep. Attila valued the Roman army lower than any barbarian's.
 
The Huns destroyed what stood before them because they could not defend themselves from the onslaught.
The city of Rome was captured and looted by the Visigoths in 410 and the Vandals in 455
This is a lie. The Battle of the Nations was decisive. Attila also defeated goths.
The goths were also worthless hucksters and henpecked
 
This is a lie. The Battle of the Nations was decisive. Attila also defeated goths.
The goths were also worthless hucksters and henpecked
.

No it isn't ... And you would be better served if you went back to trying to promote the nonsense you suggested in the OP.
At least that way we could keep laughing at your bullshit ... :auiqs.jpg:

The tangent you are currently on has reduced you to just spouting garbage with no discernable relevance.

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top