Do republicans have a limit on their philosophy of gun-owning freedom?

[NoNukes]

Cops

It makes cowards feel safer.

Then cops are cowards? Mad gay yo.

need guns as part of their job. Except here in Ireland where most cops do not carry them.

Ireland?

Conversation over!

I accept your capitulation.

Capitulation my ass.

Why are we explaining our Constitutional rights to you.

I am an American, and you do not have to explain anything to me.

 

[NoNukes]

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Tell that to the 2 million people a year that use them for defense of their lives and property. You must be on a respirator because you're obviously to stupid to breathe.

When you call someone stupid, you should use correct English. My point is that you do not need a gun to defend your life and property. Americans are living in the safest time and place in history.

Yeah, the cops have plenty of crime scene tape and chalk, right? That's all the protection we need according to idiots such as yourself. Crime is going down as gun ownership increases, that should tell you something.

Crime going down has nothing to do with gun ownership.

 

[OKTexas]

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Tell that to the 2 million people a year that use them for defense of their lives and property. You must be on a respirator because you're obviously to stupid to breathe.

When you call someone stupid, you should use correct English. My point is that you do not need a gun to defend your life and property. Americans are living in the safest time and place in history.

Duplicate

Those are the exceptions to the rule. Most people do not live in these ghettos. I doubt if OKTexas does.

You're right, but there are times I have to go into areas where they are. When I do I carry a firearm and 29 rounds of ammo.

 

[The Great Goose]

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Tell that to the 2 million people a year that use them for defense of their lives and property. You must be on a respirator because you're obviously to stupid to breathe.

When you call someone stupid, you should use correct English. My point is that you do not need a gun to defend your life and property. Americans are living in the safest time and place in history.

WTF?

JUST

WTF.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Tell that to the 2 million people a year that use them for defense of their lives and property. You must be on a respirator because you're obviously to stupid to breathe.

When you call someone stupid, you should use correct English. My point is that you do not need a gun to defend your life and property. Americans are living in the safest time and place in history.

Duplicate

Those are the exceptions to the rule. Most people do not live in these ghettos. I doubt if OKTexas does.

Are you kidding me?

Again?

That "Ghetto" in Baltimore is 10 minutes from me.


The crime in and from that "Ghetto" do not stay in that "Ghetto."

It has found its way into our neighborhoods.

The vast majority of America is not like that. You are like a spoiled little kid who cannot admit that he is wrong.

**** off asshole.

Spoiled little kid?

This is why there will be no conversation.

You resort to name calling.

Son. I happen to be fully capable of possessing and using my firearms.

I am fully trained in the use of these firearms.

What am I wrong about?

That those like you want us completely disarmed and just haven't gotten your way?

 

[Billy000]

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Pretty much. If i desire and I want to spend the money I can have my full auto. If I want a cannon I simply search Dixie gun works and click, bang my brand new 16 pounder is on my door step. Your rant is pointless because hood rats arent using class three weapons or cannons. What you are saying is I cant have guns because other people are using them to kill other people which they will continue to do no matter what tweaks are made to the 2nd.All your limits and lines on the 2nd do nothing but make it harder on people who are not thugs.

See, you're confused. I'm not asking what current laws on guns are. I want to know what YOU think the laws should be.

None. Im thnking they got plenty and most are useless. Matter of fact, I would love to have short barrled rifles off the regulated list as well as suppressors. That way I could go back to shooting in my back yard, and if I ever had to blast a hood rat in my house I wouldn't damage my hearing.

Okay so you're saying it is impossible for a gun control law to be good? Why?

In summary, the Task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws reviewed for preventing violence.

First Reports Evaluating the Effectiveness of Strategies for Preventing Violence: Firearms Laws

lol any gun control laws that get passed are always either weak or watered down. Nothing substantial ever gets passed. What you don't know is that gun control laws in Australia work. Gun violence took a nose dive in that country. Mass shootings, specifically.

 

[The Great Goose]

Cops

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Then cops are cowards? Mad gay yo.

need guns as part of their job. Except here in Ireland where most cops do not carry them.

Maybe because Ireland is a LOT safer than america?

 

[Yousaidwhat]

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Pretty much. If i desire and I want to spend the money I can have my full auto. If I want a cannon I simply search Dixie gun works and click, bang my brand new 16 pounder is on my door step. Your rant is pointless because hood rats arent using class three weapons or cannons. What you are saying is I cant have guns because other people are using them to kill other people which they will continue to do no matter what tweaks are made to the 2nd.All your limits and lines on the 2nd do nothing but make it harder on people who are not thugs.

See, you're confused. I'm not asking what current laws on guns are. I want to know what YOU think the laws should be.

Constitution.

2nd Amendment.

Shall not be infringed.

So there's no line to gun freedom? That's what you think? Yikes.

Let me make this perfectly clear.

Criminals are roaming the streets and until you figure out a way to control them and the crimes that they commit I will remain armed to defend my family.

 

[NoNukes]

When you call someone stupid, you should use correct English. My point is that you do not need a gun to defend your life and property. Americans are living in the safest time and place in history.

Duplicate

Those are the exceptions to the rule. Most people do not live in these ghettos. I doubt if OKTexas does.

Are you kidding me?

Again?

That "Ghetto" in Baltimore is 10 minutes from me.


The crime in and from that "Ghetto" do not stay in that "Ghetto."

It has found its way into our neighborhoods.

The vast majority of America is not like that. You are like a spoiled little kid who cannot admit that he is wrong.

**** off asshole.

Spoiled little kid?

This is why there will be no conversation.

You resort to name calling.

Son. I happen to be fully capable of possessing and using my firearms.

I am fully trained in the use of these firearms.

What am I wrong about?

That those like you want us completely disarmed and just haven't gotten your way?

My my are we not sensitive this morning. You are certainly someone who should not own a gun.

 

[Billy000]

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Pretty much. If i desire and I want to spend the money I can have my full auto. If I want a cannon I simply search Dixie gun works and click, bang my brand new 16 pounder is on my door step. Your rant is pointless because hood rats arent using class three weapons or cannons. What you are saying is I cant have guns because other people are using them to kill other people which they will continue to do no matter what tweaks are made to the 2nd.All your limits and lines on the 2nd do nothing but make it harder on people who are not thugs.

See, you're confused. I'm not asking what current laws on guns are. I want to know what YOU think the laws should be.

Constitution.

2nd Amendment.

Shall not be infringed.

So there's no line to gun freedom? That's what you think? Yikes.

Let me make this perfectly clear.

Criminals are roaming the streets and until you figure out a way to control them and the crimes that they commit I will remain armed to defend my family.

No one is saying you shouldnt be able to own a gun to protect your family. Goddamn it.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Duplicate

Those are the exceptions to the rule. Most people do not live in these ghettos. I doubt if OKTexas does.

Are you kidding me?

Again?

That "Ghetto" in Baltimore is 10 minutes from me.


The crime in and from that "Ghetto" do not stay in that "Ghetto."

It has found its way into our neighborhoods.

The vast majority of America is not like that. You are like a spoiled little kid who cannot admit that he is wrong.

**** off asshole.

Spoiled little kid?

This is why there will be no conversation.

You resort to name calling.

Son. I happen to be fully capable of possessing and using my firearms.

I am fully trained in the use of these firearms.

What am I wrong about?

That those like you want us completely disarmed and just haven't gotten your way?

My my are we not sensitive this morning. You are certainly someone who should not own a gun.

Sensitive?

Not even close.

I've spent my entire life armed and have yet to shoot anyone before my first cup of coffee.

Got a problem with me having firearms?

A Sheriffs Deputy lives across the Street.

Want me to wake him up for you?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

My question is where do gun nuts draw the line?

Gun nuts? I'm assuming you are referring to the founding fathers who drew no lines.

Like when it comes to open carry, what rules should it have? Should it have no rules?

Each state will have its own rules, I imagine the more conservative the state the more liberal the laws

Like some dumb redneck carrying a gun into a bar til 2 AM is okay? Anyone should be allowed to do that?

Yeah, repealing open carry laws will stop him from hiding it under his clothing and I guess that's why he is so dumb...open carry will only be used by law abiding citizens, criminals will always take the big city approach and conceal their weapons before using them in gun free zones where they are safe from retaliation.

 

[NoNukes]

Those are the exceptions to the rule. Most people do not live in these ghettos. I doubt if OKTexas does.

Are you kidding me?

Again?

That "Ghetto" in Baltimore is 10 minutes from me.


The crime in and from that "Ghetto" do not stay in that "Ghetto."

It has found its way into our neighborhoods.

The vast majority of America is not like that. You are like a spoiled little kid who cannot admit that he is wrong.

**** off asshole.

Spoiled little kid?

This is why there will be no conversation.

You resort to name calling.

Son. I happen to be fully capable of possessing and using my firearms.

I am fully trained in the use of these firearms.

What am I wrong about?

That those like you want us completely disarmed and just haven't gotten your way?

My my are we not sensitive this morning. You are certainly someone who should not own a gun.

Sensitive?

Not even close.

I've spent my entire life armed and have yet to shoot anyone before my first cup of coffee.

Got a problem with me having firearms?

A Sheriffs Deputy lives across the Street.

Want me to wake him up for you?

Sherriff's deputy lives across the street? Sounds like you live in a pretty safe place.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Well.

Good morning everyone.

I think I've succeeded in getting this thread off to a good start this fine morning.

Think I'll have my coffee now and watch the results.

 

[Crixus]

Cops

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Then cops are cowards? Mad gay yo.

need guns as part of their job. Except here in Ireland where most cops do not carry them.

Maybe because Ireland is a LOT safer than america?

Nope. Not really.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Are you kidding me?

Again?

That "Ghetto" in Baltimore is 10 minutes from me.


The crime in and from that "Ghetto" do not stay in that "Ghetto."

It has found its way into our neighborhoods.

The vast majority of America is not like that. You are like a spoiled little kid who cannot admit that he is wrong.

**** off asshole.

Spoiled little kid?

This is why there will be no conversation.

You resort to name calling.

Son. I happen to be fully capable of possessing and using my firearms.

I am fully trained in the use of these firearms.

What am I wrong about?

That those like you want us completely disarmed and just haven't gotten your way?

My my are we not sensitive this morning. You are certainly someone who should not own a gun.

Sensitive?

Not even close.

I've spent my entire life armed and have yet to shoot anyone before my first cup of coffee.

Got a problem with me having firearms?

A Sheriffs Deputy lives across the Street.

Want me to wake him up for you?

Sherriff's deputy lives across the street? Sounds like you live in a pretty safe place.

I'm surrounded by cops and Military.

He's paranoid.

He thinks people are trying to disarm Americans.

Damned near everyone within 2 miles are fully armed.

Funny thing?

None of us spend the amount of time talking about firearms as they do on this board.

 

[Crixus]

Pretty much. If i desire and I want to spend the money I can have my full auto. If I want a cannon I simply search Dixie gun works and click, bang my brand new 16 pounder is on my door step. Your rant is pointless because hood rats arent using class three weapons or cannons. What you are saying is I cant have guns because other people are using them to kill other people which they will continue to do no matter what tweaks are made to the 2nd.All your limits and lines on the 2nd do nothing but make it harder on people who are not thugs.

See, you're confused. I'm not asking what current laws on guns are. I want to know what YOU think the laws should be.

Constitution.

2nd Amendment.

Shall not be infringed.

So there's no line to gun freedom? That's what you think? Yikes.

Let me make this perfectly clear.

Criminals are roaming the streets and until you figure out a way to control them and the crimes that they commit I will remain armed to defend my family.

No one is saying you shouldnt be able to own a gun to protect your family. Goddamn it.

Enforce the laws they have now. Nuff said.

 

[Billy000]

Well.

Good morning everyone.

I think I've succeeded in getting this thread off to a good start this fine morning.

Think I'll have my coffee now and watch the results.

Yes, thank you for promoting my thread.

 

[OKTexas]

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Everything has gone our way, really? How about you tell that to people who can be arrested for possessing a single bullet in DC. Or people in NYC that have to spend hundreds and months of bureaucracy just to get permission to have a gun in their home that everything has gone their way.

Try to read man. I asked him if current laws have gone his way.

My OP question is simple. Where do YOU draw the line on the freedom to carry and discharge firearms?

Actually I answered most of that question in post #21, I say most because this is the first time in the thread you've used the word "discharge". Are you senile or just trying to move the goal posts?

I guess that's an answer. I mean it's pretty ******* vague though. Whatever the bad guys get? How do you measure that? Break it down. This isn't hard to do since you've thought so extensively on the subject, right?

True, I did just throw in "discharge" in that post. I was just trying to make you think with nuance and specifics.

You've got it a bit ass backwards here child. It's on you to justify wanting to limit my rights, I don't have to justify having my rights. At the time the 2nd was written is was perfectly legal to privately own ships of war, then folks like you came along. Figure it out for yourself, I suggest you read the various reports published by the CDC. I've posted one, here's another.

CDC Study: Use of Firearms for Self-Defense is ‘Important Crime Deterrent’

 

[OKTexas]

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Tell that to the 2 million people a year that use them for defense of their lives and property. You must be on a respirator because you're obviously to stupid to breathe.

When you call someone stupid, you should use correct English. My point is that you do not need a gun to defend your life and property. Americans are living in the safest time and place in history.

Yeah, the cops have plenty of crime scene tape and chalk, right? That's all the protection we need according to idiots such as yourself. Crime is going down as gun ownership increases, that should tell you something.

Crime going down has nothing to do with gun ownership.

CDC Study: Use of Firearms for Self-Defense is ‘Important Crime Deterrent’