Do republicans have a limit on their philosophy of gun-owning freedom?

[Yousaidwhat]

Open carry is legal anywhere except schools and government buildings. Concealed requires a permit

Okay and no problems whatsoever have arisen because of those laws?

Much safer for law abiding citizens. The castle law in Florida put a stop to home invasions and car jackings. You can shoot the criminal scumbags dead and you can't be sued by their families either.

Ok but what justifies open carry anytime, anywhere?

The 2nd amendment duh. Who are you to decide what's best for me and my family when it comes to defending ourselves against murderous rapist criminal scum? Go ahead walk through the Chicago ghettos wearing a bunch of gold jewelry unarmed see what that gets you.

So fully automatics should be legal to open carry anywhere, anytime? How about RPG launchers? Should those be legal to own and open carry whereever, whenever?

Where do you get the notion that we want to be able to tote an RPG around town?

 

[OKTexas]

Stupid question dumb ****. That line has already been drawn.

It's a simple question. Where do YOU draw the line? What limits, if any, should the 2nd amendment have?

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Everything has gone our way, really? How about you tell that to people who can be arrested for possessing a single bullet in DC. Or people in NYC that have to spend hundreds and months of bureaucracy just to get permission to have a gun in their home that everything has gone their way.

Try to read man. I asked him if current laws have gone his way.

My OP question is simple. Where do YOU draw the line on the freedom to carry and discharge firearms?

Actually I answered most of that question in post #21, I say most because this is the first time in the thread you've used the word "discharge". Are you senile or just trying to move the goal posts?

 

[NoNukes]

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Tell that to the 2 million people a year that use them for defense of their lives and property. You must be on a respirator because you're obviously to stupid to breathe.

When you call someone stupid, you should use correct English. My point is that you do not need a gun to defend your life and property. Americans are living in the safest time and place in history.

 

[NoNukes]

Cops

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Then cops are cowards? Mad gay yo.

need guns as part of their job. Except here in Ireland where most cops do not carry them.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

So let me ask you this: should anyone be allowed to carry any automatic weapon anywhere, anytime? How about an RPG launcher? Should it be legal to carry any of those fuckers around? Where do you draw the line? Is there no line at all?

Stupid question dumb ****. That line has already been drawn.

It's a simple question. Where do YOU draw the line? What limits, if any, should the 2nd amendment have?

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Everything has gone our way, really? How about you tell that to people who can be arrested for possessing a single bullet in DC. Or people in NYC that have to spend hundreds and months of bureaucracy just to get permission to have a gun in their home that everything has gone their way.

Or the innocent female moving to New Jersey facing criminal charges for relocating her legally owned firearms.

Or the firearms and accessories that I own but cannot bring to Maryland because they are not legal though legal in many other States.

The examples are numerous.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Like is it in their fantasy for it to one day be legal for anyone to open-carry automatic rifles whenever and where ever?

My question is where do gun nuts draw the line? Like when it comes to open carry, what rules should it have? Should it have no rules? Like some dumb redneck carrying a gun into a bar til 2 AM is okay? Anyone should be allowed to do that?

As usual republicans struggle with nuance when it comes to political issues they are obsessed with. For example, cons will likely reply to this thread and start making the ridiculous claim that I think the 2nd amendment should be overturned. I don't. I also don't think semi-automatics should be illegal. I support laws that are designed to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people. I also think open carry is ridiculous.

It doesn't really matter if I say all of that though. In their minds I'm a "snowflake" that is outraged over boys playing with toy guns. I'm nothing but a naive, pretentious "libtard" with a Gender's Studies degree who thinks guns are evil. Cliche is something easy for republicans to grasp I guess.

Their philosophy on gun ownership is driven and governed by all the restrictions placed on gun ownership in the constitution...much like the lefts who adhere to all the restrictions the constitution puts on freedom of the press and speech...where do they draw the line? like when it comes to destroying ones character simply because of his politics, or pretending one candidate is better qualified simply due to her gender...and yes this the same thing...many lives and careers have been destroyed simply because those protected by the first amendment wanted to do it...You cannot cherry pick the constitution, when something in it is in question the rule of thumb answer is to always err on the side of the rights of the people

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Tell that to the 2 million people a year that use them for defense of their lives and property. You must be on a respirator because you're obviously to stupid to breathe.

When you call someone stupid, you should use correct English. My point is that you do not need a gun to defend your life and property. Americans are living in the safest time and place in history.

You are kidding aren't you?

Ever live in Baltimore City? Chicago?

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Tell that to the 2 million people a year that use them for defense of their lives and property. You must be on a respirator because you're obviously to stupid to breathe.

When you call someone stupid, you should use correct English. My point is that you do not need a gun to defend your life and property. Americans are living in the safest time and place in history.

Duplicate

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Stupid question dumb ****. That line has already been drawn.

It's a simple question. Where do YOU draw the line? What limits, if any, should the 2nd amendment have?

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Pretty much. If i desire and I want to spend the money I can have my full auto. If I want a cannon I simply search Dixie gun works and click, bang my brand new 16 pounder is on my door step. Your rant is pointless because hood rats arent using class three weapons or cannons. What you are saying is I cant have guns because other people are using them to kill other people which they will continue to do no matter what tweaks are made to the 2nd.All your limits and lines on the 2nd do nothing but make it harder on people who are not thugs.

See, you're confused. I'm not asking what current laws on guns are. I want to know what YOU think the laws should be.

Constitution.

2nd Amendment.

Shall not be infringed.

 

[NoNukes]

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Tell that to the 2 million people a year that use them for defense of their lives and property. You must be on a respirator because you're obviously to stupid to breathe.

When you call someone stupid, you should use correct English. My point is that you do not need a gun to defend your life and property. Americans are living in the safest time and place in history.

Duplicate

Those are the exceptions to the rule. Most people do not live in these ghettos. I doubt if OKTexas does.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Cops

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Then cops are cowards? Mad gay yo.

need guns as part of their job. Except here in Ireland where most cops do not carry them.

Ireland?

Conversation over!

 

[OKTexas]

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Pretty much. If i desire and I want to spend the money I can have my full auto. If I want a cannon I simply search Dixie gun works and click, bang my brand new 16 pounder is on my door step. Your rant is pointless because hood rats arent using class three weapons or cannons. What you are saying is I cant have guns because other people are using them to kill other people which they will continue to do no matter what tweaks are made to the 2nd.All your limits and lines on the 2nd do nothing but make it harder on people who are not thugs.

See, you're confused. I'm not asking what current laws on guns are. I want to know what YOU think the laws should be.

None. Im thnking they got plenty and most are useless. Matter of fact, I would love to have short barrled rifles off the regulated list as well as suppressors. That way I could go back to shooting in my back yard, and if I ever had to blast a hood rat in my house I wouldn't damage my hearing.

Okay so you're saying it is impossible for a gun control law to be good? Why?

In summary, the Task Force found insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws reviewed for preventing violence.

First Reports Evaluating the Effectiveness of Strategies for Preventing Violence: Firearms Laws

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Tell that to the 2 million people a year that use them for defense of their lives and property. You must be on a respirator because you're obviously to stupid to breathe.

When you call someone stupid, you should use correct English. My point is that you do not need a gun to defend your life and property. Americans are living in the safest time and place in history.

Duplicate

Those are the exceptions to the rule. Most people do not live in these ghettos. I doubt if OKTexas does.

Are you kidding me?

Again?

That "Ghetto" in Baltimore is 10 minutes from me.


The crime in and from that "Ghetto" do not stay in that "Ghetto."

It has found its way into our neighborhoods.

 

[NoNukes]

Cops

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Then cops are cowards? Mad gay yo.

need guns as part of their job. Except here in Ireland where most cops do not carry them.

Ireland?

Conversation over!

I accept your capitulation.

 

[Billy000]

It's a simple question. Where do YOU draw the line? What limits, if any, should the 2nd amendment have?

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Everything has gone our way, really? How about you tell that to people who can be arrested for possessing a single bullet in DC. Or people in NYC that have to spend hundreds and months of bureaucracy just to get permission to have a gun in their home that everything has gone their way.

Try to read man. I asked him if current laws have gone his way.

My OP question is simple. Where do YOU draw the line on the freedom to carry and discharge firearms?

Actually I answered most of that question in post #21, I say most because this is the first time in the thread you've used the word "discharge". Are you senile or just trying to move the goal posts?

I guess that's an answer. I mean it's pretty ******* vague though. Whatever the bad guys get? How do you measure that? Break it down. This isn't hard to do since you've thought so extensively on the subject, right?

True, I did just throw in "discharge" in that post. I was just trying to make you think with nuance and specifics.

 

[Yousaidwhat]

Cops

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Then cops are cowards? Mad gay yo.

need guns as part of their job. Except here in Ireland where most cops do not carry them.

Ireland?

Conversation over!

I accept your capitulation.

Capitulation my ass.

Why are we explaining our Constitutional rights to you.

 

[NoNukes]

It makes cowards feel safer.

Tell that to the 2 million people a year that use them for defense of their lives and property. You must be on a respirator because you're obviously to stupid to breathe.

When you call someone stupid, you should use correct English. My point is that you do not need a gun to defend your life and property. Americans are living in the safest time and place in history.

Duplicate

Those are the exceptions to the rule. Most people do not live in these ghettos. I doubt if OKTexas does.

Are you kidding me?

Again?

That "Ghetto" in Baltimore is 10 minutes from me.


The crime in and from that "Ghetto" do not stay in that "Ghetto."

It has found its way into our neighborhoods.

The vast majority of America is not like that. You are like a spoiled little kid who cannot admit that he is wrong.

 

[Billy000]

It's a simple question. Where do YOU draw the line? What limits, if any, should the 2nd amendment have?

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Pretty much. If i desire and I want to spend the money I can have my full auto. If I want a cannon I simply search Dixie gun works and click, bang my brand new 16 pounder is on my door step. Your rant is pointless because hood rats arent using class three weapons or cannons. What you are saying is I cant have guns because other people are using them to kill other people which they will continue to do no matter what tweaks are made to the 2nd.All your limits and lines on the 2nd do nothing but make it harder on people who are not thugs.

See, you're confused. I'm not asking what current laws on guns are. I want to know what YOU think the laws should be.

Constitution.

2nd Amendment.

Shall not be infringed.

So there's no line to gun freedom? That's what you think? Yikes.

 

[OKTexas]

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Tell that to the 2 million people a year that use them for defense of their lives and property. You must be on a respirator because you're obviously to stupid to breathe.

When you call someone stupid, you should use correct English. My point is that you do not need a gun to defend your life and property. Americans are living in the safest time and place in history.

Yeah, the cops have plenty of crime scene tape and chalk, right? That's all the protection we need according to idiots such as yourself. Crime is going down as gun ownership increases, that should tell you something.

 

[Crixus]

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Pretty much. If i desire and I want to spend the money I can have my full auto. If I want a cannon I simply search Dixie gun works and click, bang my brand new 16 pounder is on my door step. Your rant is pointless because hood rats arent using class three weapons or cannons. What you are saying is I cant have guns because other people are using them to kill other people which they will continue to do no matter what tweaks are made to the 2nd.All your limits and lines on the 2nd do nothing but make it harder on people who are not thugs.

See, you're confused. I'm not asking what current laws on guns are. I want to know what YOU think the laws should be.

Constitution.

2nd Amendment.

Shall not be infringed.

So there's no line to gun freedom? That's what you think? Yikes.

See? pointless.