Do republicans have a limit on their philosophy of gun-owning freedom?

[OKTexas]

Open carry is legal anywhere except schools and government buildings. Concealed requires a permit

Okay and no problems whatsoever have arisen because of those laws?

Much safer for law abiding citizens. The castle law in Florida put a stop to home invasions and car jackings. You can shoot the criminal scumbags dead and you can't be sued by their families either.

Ok but what justifies open carry anytime, anywhere?

Is there something about "shall not be infringed" that confuses you?

So let me ask you this: should anyone be allowed to carry any automatic weapon anywhere, anytime? How about an RPG launcher? Should it be legal to carry any of those fuckers around? Where do you draw the line? Is there no line at all?

law abiding citizens should be able to have firepower equal to or greater than anything the bad guys can get their hands on. Also my right to life, which includes my right to defend my life, doesn't end at my property line, neither does yours.

 

[Crixus]

Open carry is legal anywhere except schools and government buildings. Concealed requires a permit

Okay and no problems whatsoever have arisen because of those laws?

Much safer for law abiding citizens. The castle law in Florida put a stop to home invasions and car jackings. You can shoot the criminal scumbags dead and you can't be sued by their families either.

Ok but what justifies open carry anytime, anywhere?

Is there something about "shall not be infringed" that confuses you?

So let me ask you this: should anyone be allowed to carry any automatic weapon anywhere, anytime? How about an RPG launcher? Should it be legal to carry any of those fuckers around? Where do you draw the line? Is there no line at all?

Stupid question dumb ****. That line has already been drawn.

 

[NoNukes]

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

 

[Billy000]

Okay and no problems whatsoever have arisen because of those laws?

Much safer for law abiding citizens. The castle law in Florida put a stop to home invasions and car jackings. You can shoot the criminal scumbags dead and you can't be sued by their families either.

Ok but what justifies open carry anytime, anywhere?

Is there something about "shall not be infringed" that confuses you?

So let me ask you this: should anyone be allowed to carry any automatic weapon anywhere, anytime? How about an RPG launcher? Should it be legal to carry any of those fuckers around? Where do you draw the line? Is there no line at all?

Stupid question dumb ****. That line has already been drawn.

It's a simple question. Where do YOU draw the line? What limits, if any, should the 2nd amendment have?

 

[OKTexas]

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Tell that to the 2 million people a year that use them for defense of their lives and property. You must be on a respirator because you're obviously to stupid to breathe.

 

[Crixus]

Like is it in their fantasy for it to one day be legal for anyone to open-carry automatic rifles whenever and where ever?

My question is where do gun nuts draw the line? Like when it comes to open carry, what rules should it have? Should it have no rules? Like some dumb redneck carrying a gun into a bar til 2 AM is okay? Anyone should be allowed to do that?

As usual republicans struggle with nuance when it comes to political issues they are obsessed with. For example, cons will likely reply to this thread and start making the ridiculous claim that I think the 2nd amendment should be overturned. I don't. I also don't think semi-automatics should be illegal. I support laws that are designed to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people. I also think open carry is ridiculous.

It doesn't really matter if I say all of that though. In their minds I'm a "snowflake" that is outraged over boys playing with toy guns. I'm nothing but a naive, pretentious "libtard" with a Gender's Studies degree who thinks guns are evil. Cliche is something easy for republicans to grasp I guess.

Do libs have the same limits on car ownership and alcohol which by any measure kill more people every year then guns do ? John Edwards had his kid killed by a retard in a car and the vice dumbfuck (for a bit longer) even lied about his wife being killed by a drink driver, yet no move to ban booze or cars. If there were no political advantage to being anti gun democrats would not even bother with the issue.

We can talk about car accidents and alcohol if you want, but why don't you answer the question first?

Its already been answered a billion times over and over. Its only a political issue because its sexy. Same with the RPG and nuclear missile bull shit. There is no reason in the OP, its nothing but blather.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

My question is where do gun nuts draw the line?
You should have stopped with your first question. If you had then it would have appeared that you wanted to have a discussion. Instead you actually do come off as a "pretentious libtard". You really didn't want a dialog just a space to incoherently rant about "gun nuts" and their "toys" .

 

[Crixus]

Much safer for law abiding citizens. The castle law in Florida put a stop to home invasions and car jackings. You can shoot the criminal scumbags dead and you can't be sued by their families either.

Ok but what justifies open carry anytime, anywhere?

Is there something about "shall not be infringed" that confuses you?

So let me ask you this: should anyone be allowed to carry any automatic weapon anywhere, anytime? How about an RPG launcher? Should it be legal to carry any of those fuckers around? Where do you draw the line? Is there no line at all?

Stupid question dumb ****. That line has already been drawn.

It's a simple question. Where do YOU draw the line? What limits, if any, should the 2nd amendment have?

The ones it already does.

 

[Billy000]

My question is where do gun nuts draw the line?
You should have stopped with your first question. If you had then it would have appeared that you wanted to have a discussion. Instead you actually do come off as a "pretentious libtard". You really didn't want a dialog just a space to incoherently rant about "gun nuts" and their "toys" .

lol I'm asking a pretty basic question. Where do you draw the line? Stop pretending this isn't a fair question.

 

[Billy000]

Ok but what justifies open carry anytime, anywhere?

Is there something about "shall not be infringed" that confuses you?

So let me ask you this: should anyone be allowed to carry any automatic weapon anywhere, anytime? How about an RPG launcher? Should it be legal to carry any of those fuckers around? Where do you draw the line? Is there no line at all?

Stupid question dumb ****. That line has already been drawn.

It's a simple question. Where do YOU draw the line? What limits, if any, should the 2nd amendment have?

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

 

[Crixus]

Is there something about "shall not be infringed" that confuses you?

So let me ask you this: should anyone be allowed to carry any automatic weapon anywhere, anytime? How about an RPG launcher? Should it be legal to carry any of those fuckers around? Where do you draw the line? Is there no line at all?

Stupid question dumb ****. That line has already been drawn.

It's a simple question. Where do YOU draw the line? What limits, if any, should the 2nd amendment have?

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Pretty much. If i desire and I want to spend the money I can have my full auto. If I want a cannon I simply search Dixie gun works and click, bang my brand new 16 pounder is on my door step. Your rant is pointless because hood rats arent using class three weapons or cannons. What you are saying is I cant have guns because other people are using them to kill other people which they will continue to do no matter what tweaks are made to the 2nd.All your limits and lines on the 2nd do nothing but make it harder on people who are not thugs.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

My question is where do gun nuts draw the line?
You should have stopped with your first question. If you had then it would have appeared that you wanted to have a discussion. Instead you actually do come off as a "pretentious libtard". You really didn't want a dialog just a space to incoherently rant about "gun nuts" and their "toys" .

lol I'm asking a pretty basic question. Where do you draw the line? Stop pretending this isn't a fair question.

Sorry but I don't answer questions from people who really don't want an answer.

 

[OKTexas]

Is there something about "shall not be infringed" that confuses you?

So let me ask you this: should anyone be allowed to carry any automatic weapon anywhere, anytime? How about an RPG launcher? Should it be legal to carry any of those fuckers around? Where do you draw the line? Is there no line at all?

Stupid question dumb ****. That line has already been drawn.

It's a simple question. Where do YOU draw the line? What limits, if any, should the 2nd amendment have?

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Everything has gone our way, really? How about you tell that to people who can be arrested for possessing a single bullet in DC. Or people in NYC that have to spend hundreds and months of bureaucracy just to get permission to have a gun in their home that everything has gone their way.

 

[Crixus]

Nothing wrong with gun owning freedom.

It makes cowards feel safer.

Then cops are cowards? Mad gay yo.

 

[Billy000]

So let me ask you this: should anyone be allowed to carry any automatic weapon anywhere, anytime? How about an RPG launcher? Should it be legal to carry any of those fuckers around? Where do you draw the line? Is there no line at all?

Stupid question dumb ****. That line has already been drawn.

It's a simple question. Where do YOU draw the line? What limits, if any, should the 2nd amendment have?

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Pretty much. If i desire and I want to spend the money I can have my full auto. If I want a cannon I simply search Dixie gun works and click, bang my brand new 16 pounder is on my door step. Your rant is pointless because hood rats arent using class three weapons or cannons. What you are saying is I cant have guns because other people are using them to kill other people which they will continue to do no matter what tweaks are made to the 2nd.All your limits and lines on the 2nd do nothing but make it harder on people who are not thugs.

See, you're confused. I'm not asking what current laws on guns are. I want to know what YOU think the laws should be.

 

[Crixus]

So let me ask you this: should anyone be allowed to carry any automatic weapon anywhere, anytime? How about an RPG launcher? Should it be legal to carry any of those fuckers around? Where do you draw the line? Is there no line at all?

Stupid question dumb ****. That line has already been drawn.

It's a simple question. Where do YOU draw the line? What limits, if any, should the 2nd amendment have?

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Everything has gone our way, really? How about you tell that to people who can be arrested for possessing a single bullet in DC. Or people in NYC that have to spend hundreds and months of bureaucracy just to get permission to have a gun in their home that everything has gone their way.

Or all that bullet button crap like in cali. Its crazy, and all the places where gun laws are stiff the gun crime is the worst. A better question would be is where do you libs draw a line on other folks personal safety and pass times ?

 

[Billy000]

So let me ask you this: should anyone be allowed to carry any automatic weapon anywhere, anytime? How about an RPG launcher? Should it be legal to carry any of those fuckers around? Where do you draw the line? Is there no line at all?

Stupid question dumb ****. That line has already been drawn.

It's a simple question. Where do YOU draw the line? What limits, if any, should the 2nd amendment have?

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Everything has gone our way, really? How about you tell that to people who can be arrested for possessing a single bullet in DC. Or people in NYC that have to spend hundreds and months of bureaucracy just to get permission to have a gun in their home that everything has gone their way.

Try to read man. I asked him if current laws have gone his way.

My OP question is simple. Where do YOU draw the line on the freedom to carry and discharge firearms?

 

[Crixus]

Stupid question dumb ****. That line has already been drawn.

It's a simple question. Where do YOU draw the line? What limits, if any, should the 2nd amendment have?

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Pretty much. If i desire and I want to spend the money I can have my full auto. If I want a cannon I simply search Dixie gun works and click, bang my brand new 16 pounder is on my door step. Your rant is pointless because hood rats arent using class three weapons or cannons. What you are saying is I cant have guns because other people are using them to kill other people which they will continue to do no matter what tweaks are made to the 2nd.All your limits and lines on the 2nd do nothing but make it harder on people who are not thugs.

See, you're confused. I'm not asking what current laws on guns are. I want to know what YOU think the laws should be.

None. Im thnking they got plenty and most are useless. Matter of fact, I would love to have short barrled rifles off the regulated list as well as suppressors. That way I could go back to shooting in my back yard, and if I ever had to blast a hood rat in my house I wouldn't damage my hearing.

 

[OKTexas]

Stupid question dumb ****. That line has already been drawn.

It's a simple question. Where do YOU draw the line? What limits, if any, should the 2nd amendment have?

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Everything has gone our way, really? How about you tell that to people who can be arrested for possessing a single bullet in DC. Or people in NYC that have to spend hundreds and months of bureaucracy just to get permission to have a gun in their home that everything has gone their way.

Or all that bullet button crap like in cali. Its crazy, and all the places where gun laws are stiff the gun crime is the worst. A better question would be is where do you libs draw a line on other folks personal safety and pass times ?

Don't even be saying "you libs" when addressing me.

 

[Billy000]

It's a simple question. Where do YOU draw the line? What limits, if any, should the 2nd amendment have?

The ones it already does.

Oh is that so? A 2nd amendment advocate likes what the government has currently ruled about the amendment. Everything went your way huh?

Pretty much. If i desire and I want to spend the money I can have my full auto. If I want a cannon I simply search Dixie gun works and click, bang my brand new 16 pounder is on my door step. Your rant is pointless because hood rats arent using class three weapons or cannons. What you are saying is I cant have guns because other people are using them to kill other people which they will continue to do no matter what tweaks are made to the 2nd.All your limits and lines on the 2nd do nothing but make it harder on people who are not thugs.

See, you're confused. I'm not asking what current laws on guns are. I want to know what YOU think the laws should be.

None. Im thnking they got plenty and most are useless. Matter of fact, I would love to have short barrled rifles off the regulated list as well as suppressors. That way I could go back to shooting in my back yard, and if I ever had to blast a hood rat in my house I wouldn't damage my hearing.

Okay so you're saying it is impossible for a gun control law to be good? Why?