Do republicans have a limit on their philosophy of gun-owning freedom?

Poor prone position -- you should tuck a leg under to get your diaphragm/chest off the ground.

Pfft ... I think it would be funny as hell if an errant piece of hot brass branded her ass by some miracle of physics.

.
 
Poor prone position -- you should tuck a leg under to get your diaphragm/chest off the ground.

Pfft ... I think it would be funny as hell if an errant piece of hot brass branded her ass by some miracle of physics.

.
not me; i think she should practice over and over again in a minimicro or peekaboo, until she becomes well regulated.
 
Pfft ... I think it would be funny as hell if an errant piece of hot brass branded her ass by some miracle of physics.
It's funny, once the pain stops :)

My first time to the range to qualify with the AR in the Army ... I was next to a lefty who forgot to get a deflector.
A piece of hot brass got caught between her cheek and the chin strap on her helmet ... It wasn't ever funny.

.
 
Like is it in their fantasy for it to one day be legal for anyone to open-carry automatic rifles whenever and where ever?

My question is where do gun nuts draw the line? Like when it comes to open carry, what rules should it have? Should it have no rules? Like some dumb redneck carrying a gun into a bar til 2 AM is okay? Anyone should be allowed to do that?

As usual republicans struggle with nuance when it comes to political issues they are obsessed with. For example, cons will likely reply to this thread and start making the ridiculous claim that I think the 2nd amendment should be overturned. I don't. I also don't think semi-automatics should be illegal. I support laws that are designed to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people. I also think open carry is ridiculous.

It doesn't really matter if I say all of that though. In their minds I'm a "snowflake" that is outraged over boys playing with toy guns. I'm nothing but a naive, pretentious "libtard" with a Gender's Studies degree who thinks guns are evil. Cliche is something easy for republicans to grasp I guess.

The limit is in the Constitution. Your rights can be infringed on only if you are able to limit them through due process of law. It's not that hard
the law of the land is subject to legislation.

So government can pass laws outlawing abortion and sending people to jail if they criticize Obama? Why do we have a Constitution then?
It is politics. We have a Constitution, why is equal protection of the law still a problem for the right?

It is exactly BECAUSE we have a Constitution ---- and it needs to be protected.

The abuse and attacks against our constitutional rights over the past 8 years MUST be stopped.
 
Like is it in their fantasy for it to one day be legal for anyone to open-carry automatic rifles whenever and where ever?

My question is where do gun nuts draw the line? Like when it comes to open carry, what rules should it have? Should it have no rules? Like some dumb redneck carrying a gun into a bar til 2 AM is okay? Anyone should be allowed to do that?

As usual republicans struggle with nuance when it comes to political issues they are obsessed with. For example, cons will likely reply to this thread and start making the ridiculous claim that I think the 2nd amendment should be overturned. I don't. I also don't think semi-automatics should be illegal. I support laws that are designed to keep guns out of the hands of dangerous people. I also think open carry is ridiculous.

It doesn't really matter if I say all of that though. In their minds I'm a "snowflake" that is outraged over boys playing with toy guns. I'm nothing but a naive, pretentious "libtard" with a Gender's Studies degree who thinks guns are evil. Cliche is something easy for republicans to grasp I guess.

The limit is in the Constitution. Your rights can be infringed on only if you are able to limit them through due process of law. It's not that hard
the law of the land is subject to legislation.

So government can pass laws outlawing abortion and sending people to jail if they criticize Obama? Why do we have a Constitution then?
It is politics. We have a Constitution, why is equal protection of the law still a problem for the right?

It is exactly BECAUSE we have a Constitution ---- and it needs to be protected.

The abuse and attacks against our constitutional rights over the past 8 years MUST be stopped.
a lack of equal protection of the law has been going on for more than eight years.
 
Back
Top Bottom