District Court Upholds California AWB

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
55,778
Reaction score
1,198
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Just like politicians and government thugs no judge has the legal authority to infringe upon the right the keep and bear arms. If they do, like this court did, then they are acting illegally.
This is a sovereign State's right, secured by our Second Amendment:
SECTION 22. RIGHT TO ARMS
Subject only to the police power, the right of the individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
(Source: Illinois Constitution.)
Our Ninth and Tenth Amendments apply.

This is a Due Process issue that must be resolved by the citizenry of this sovereign State.
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
55,778
Reaction score
1,198
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
We are quibbling this sovereign States' right under our Constitutional form of government.
There are no states rights when it comes to a federally protected right.
lol. There is no appeal to ignorance of the first clause of our Second Amendment.
The bill of rights has been federally protected since they were written in 1792
Our Second Amendment is about the security of our free States. It says so in the, Intent and Purpose for the second clause, clause.
It's also a federally protected right just as the 14th is which states a state cannot deprive citizens of that state of their rights.
Only the unorganized militia complain about gun control.

SECTION 22. RIGHT TO ARMS
Subject only to the police power, the right of the
individual citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be
infringed.
(Source: Illinois Constitution.)
 

danielpalos

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2015
Messages
55,778
Reaction score
1,198
Points
1,855
Location
Alta California, federalist.
Which was expanded upon Heller to include all weapons in common use for traditionally legal purposes.
The anti-gun loons have to lie to themselves.
I agree this issue needs to be put to rest and for good.
We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States.

Don't grab guns, grab gun lovers and regulate them well until we have no security problems in our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
That is the Common law for the Common defense which any Common judge can adjudicate.
ok we have a second amendment but why do we continue to visit this basic right?
Because you keep missing the whole and entire point fo our Second Article of Amendment to our federal Constitution.

It is about States' sovereign right to their own security.
I'm not overlooking anything the second amendment is federally protected like all our rights spelled out in the bill of rights. Just as the 14th amendments states.
Our Second Amendment cannot be about the whole and entire concept of natural rights simply Because all terms expressed are collective and plural, not singular or individual.

Thus, right wing implied fantasy cannot be faithful to our supreme law of the land.
 

M14 Shooter

The Light of Truth
Joined
Sep 26, 2007
Messages
25,772
Reaction score
2,474
Points
275
Location
Where I can see you, but you can't see me
And residents of California have ample access to other firearms sufficient to facilitate personal self-defense.
Tell us how this satisfies the holding from the USSC that the 2nd amendment protects the right to keep and bear ALL "bearable arms" for traditionally lawful purposes.
Try to not lie while doing so.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top