Heller got the precedence from MILLER. In common use of the timeBut yes they did U.S. VS Miller 1939 which Heller and McDonald both used Miller as precedencethe AR15 because it is in common use cannot be banned according to the supreme court.We have a Second Article of Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States.
This is the common law for the common defense:
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
It should not be about "grabbing guns" but about "grabbing gun lovers and regulating them well until we have no more security problems in our free States."
I'll be so glad when all the states finally ban the AR-15 and it's various clones. That will do 3 things. 1. It will take away the cult of Mass Shootings 2. It will lower the body count at mass shootings. 3. When you decide to defend your ARs with your ARs, we don't have you in here crying about it since you won't be around anymore.
hate to break your bubble but the Supreme Court never has made that ruling. If so, let's see it word for word so I can fact check it. There is that nasty thing that trips you up all the time. Facts need to be verified. And the Courts have been upholding the banning of the AR-15 and it's various clones. California just in the last couple of days and in Boston
Federal judge upholds Massachusetts ban on AR-15, large capacity magazines
In order for a firearm to be protected by the second amendment, it must have some reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well-regulated militia, in common use of the time, and supplied by the citizen.
Heller is the most important ruling in modern times. It made the ruling using the term "Normal". It didn't define what "Normal" is. The Feds can't. That definition is up to the States. The ONLY reason the Supreme Court was involved was that it was DC which didn't have a State Supreme Court being that it's not a state. Heller V like McDonald V had to do with a City denying the ability of a citizen to have a handgun in their home. What came out of both was that they did have that right. But the City had the right to require registration and licensing of both the weapon and the person. Reading anything else from those two are right up there with claiming that they also ruled that Space Aliens are kept in a deep basement in Cleveland.