Dispute erupts over whether Brennan, Comey pushed Steele dossier, as DOJ probe into misconduct begin

[Superbadbrutha]

There have been plenty of Trump Humpers indicted already.

For nothing having anything to do with Trump. You've got nothing, you just cannot accept it.

Cohen had nothing to do with donnie?

Cohen was a liar. His testimony was not taken seriously. That's why none of what he said was acted upon.

Hell Trump is a liar, birds of a feather.

 

[S.J.]

There have been plenty of Trump Humpers indicted already.

For nothing having anything to do with Trump. You've got nothing, you just cannot accept it.

Cohen had nothing to do with donnie?

Cohen was a liar. His testimony was not taken seriously. That's why none of what he said was acted upon.

Hell Trump is a liar, birds of a feather.

Still waiting for that evidence.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

There have been plenty of Trump Humpers indicted already.

For nothing having anything to do with Trump. You've got nothing, you just cannot accept it.

Cohen had nothing to do with donnie?

Cohen was a liar. His testimony was not taken seriously. That's why none of what he said was acted upon.

Hell Trump is a liar, birds of a feather.

Still waiting for that evidence.

Hold your breath while you are waiting.

 

[Doc7505]

I'm sure I would find a long list of accusations but I'm not interested in accusations. I'm interested proof, and you don't have any. If there WAS any proof of obstruction, why didn't Mueller SAY there was proof?

The Mueller findings are proof, not speculation.

~~~~~~
Then why hasn't Trump or others indicted for the accusations you falsely keep making?

There have been plenty of Trump Humpers indicted already. You are lost in the sauce.

No doubt that some were caught in illegal actions NOT concerned whatsoever with Trump or the campaign. Unlike Tony Resko, or Rod Blagojevich.

That's the lie that is being told by Trump Humpers.

~~~~~~
Hmm...., like you, the Same Guy Who Claimed There Was a Russian Embassy in Miami is The "Key Source" for Both the Pee-Pee Party Claim and the Whole Claim of an "Extensive Conspiracy" Between Trump and Russia. Documents confirming that "SOURCE E" is responsible for all these claims. The guy who doesn't know where the Russian embassy is, but knows all about Russian KOMPROMAT missions and somehow knows that Trump is conspiring with Russia. Seems we are blessed with stupid Leftist enemies.

 

[Kilroy2]

Can you tell us why you Trump Humpers defend a President who was trying to obstruct an investigation and continues to defy the Constitution.

Where's your proof that he obstructed justice or defies the Constitution?

Where in the hell have you been.

Waiting for an answer. Apparently you don't have one.

I don't have time to post that many answers. Just Google Trump lies and obstruction and you will receive a pretty long list.

I'm sure I would find a long list of accusations but I'm not interested in accusations. I'm interested proof, and you don't have any. If there WAS any proof of obstruction, why didn't Mueller SAY there was proof?

Pg 199 Mueller report

The office determined that certain individuals associated with the campaign lied to investigators about Campaign contacts with Russian and have taken other to interfere with the investigation. The office therefore charged some US persons connected to the campaign with false statements and obstruction offenses



George P

Flynn

Cohen

Jeff Session even though he lied there was insufficient proof that it was willful



Pg 213

The OLC has issued an opinion finding that the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its function. Mueller office accepted OLC legal conclusion concerning prosecution of Trump



If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the fats that the President clearly did NOT commit obstruction of justice, we would so STATE. Based on the facts and the legal standards, however we are unable to reach THAT JUDGMENT.



The firing of Comey, Trump lied about the firing and it was done after asking comey could not say that the President was being investigated. Trump fired him before hearing from the DOJ about any recommendations of firing him


When Trump learned of the special counsel being appointed, he demanded Session resign. Session submitted his resignation, but the President ultimately did not accept it yet.

Trump told aides that the SC had conflict of intrest and suggested that the SC not serve

His advisor said no and it was merit less accusation


President and his tweets criticizing DOJ and the Prez called MCGahn at home and directed him to call the AG and say conflict of intrest was involved. McGahn refused and would resign rather than do a potential Saturday Night Massacre.

The Mueller report even though there are over 400 pages will provide any proof that Trump tried to obstruct justice and provide numerous incidents that can be listed.

So if you want proof then read it if you don't care then don't read it.

 

[S.J.]

For nothing having anything to do with Trump. You've got nothing, you just cannot accept it.

Cohen had nothing to do with donnie?

Cohen was a liar. His testimony was not taken seriously. That's why none of what he said was acted upon.

Hell Trump is a liar, birds of a feather.

Still waiting for that evidence.

Hold your breath while you are waiting.

IOW you don't have shit. Thanks for confirming.

 

[S.J.]

The OLC has issued an opinion finding that the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its function. Mueller office accepted OLC legal conclusion concerning prosecution of Trump

So what? Concluding that he can't indict a sitting President does not prevent him from declaring that Trump obstructed justice. So why didn't he?

If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the fats that the President clearly did NOT commit obstruction of justice, we would so STATE. Based on the facts and the legal standards, however we are unable to reach THAT JUDGMENT.

Mueller was not looking for exculpatory evidence, so naturally he is not going to find any. His job was not to prove Trump's innocence, it was to prove his guilt (which he clearly failed to do). So don't give me that bullshit that there's "plenty of evidence of obstruction against Trump". There is none and you know it.

 

[Doc7505]

Dispute erupts over whether Brennan, Comey pushed Steele dossier, as DOJ probe into misconduct begins
​

Dispute erupts over whether Brennan, Comey pushed Steele dossier, as DOJ probe into misconduct begins
05/15/2019 | Greg Re, Catherine Herrige
A high-level dispute over which senior government officials pushed the unverified Steele dossier amid efforts to surveil the Trump campaign has broken out into the open again, after it emerged that Attorney General William Barr appointed a U.S. attorney to examine the origins of the Russia investigation and determine if the FBI and DOJ's actions were "lawful and appropriate." Sources familiar with the records told Fox News that a late-2016 email chain indicated then-FBI Director James Comey told bureau subordinates that then-CIA Director John Brennan insisted the dossier be included in the intelligence community assessment on Russian interference, known as the ICA.
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathleen Kavalec’s written account of her meeting with Steele on Oct. 11, 2016, was sent to the FBI prior to the bureau's FISA warrant application to monitor Page, according to records unearthed in a transparency lawsuit by Citizens United.

~~~~~~
Indeed, the Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats are trying to change the story. They are going to throw Comey to the wolves and make sure the investigation dies with that.
Barack Hussein Obama, James Clapper, John Brennan, James Comey.....100% guilty candidates for “Orange Jump Suits” and forever lasting prison terms. All of them, plus adding Hillary Clinton are Traitors and Turncoats to the USA Republican and all its people!!! Case closed.
No doubt the prime persons of interest are now looking to blame the others. Let the blood bath begin. Who will be the first to blame the others? There's reason to believe that Comey or Brennan have very incriminating tapes they are saving as their get out of jail free cards.
Surely A.G. Barr and Durham know the truth but want the public to witness the lefts lies.

~~~~~~
Italy has flipped on Brennan, turning over Joseph Mifsud ...
Italy has flipped on Brennan, turning over Joseph Mifsud… – CITIZEN FREE PRESS
Italy has flipped and are giving up Brennan. — George Papadopoulos (@GeorgePapa19) May 16, 2019 . The Italian prime minister has suddenly requested resignations from 6 deputy directors of Italian intelligence agencies: DIS, AISI and AISE. This was all after I outed Mifsud in Rome and the president called the Italian prime minister. Italy has flipped and are giving up Brennan.

The light is beginning to shine through the darkness and the truth will rise to the surface. The coup has failed and the diabolical and wicked treasonous traitors will all be exposed in the open with no place to hide. Stay Frosty.....

 

[Kilroy2]

The OLC has issued an opinion finding that the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its function. Mueller office accepted OLC legal conclusion concerning prosecution of Trump

So what? Concluding that he can't indict a sitting President does not prevent him from declaring that Trump obstructed justice. So why didn't he?

If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the fats that the President clearly did NOT commit obstruction of justice, we would so STATE. Based on the facts and the legal standards, however we are unable to reach THAT JUDGMENT.

Mueller was not looking for exculpatory evidence, so naturally he is not going to find any. His job was not to prove Trump's innocence, it was to prove his guilt (which he clearly failed to do). So don't give me that bullshit that there's "plenty of evidence of obstruction against Trump". There is none and you know it.

If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the fats that the President clearly did NOT commit obstruction of justice, we would so STATE. Based on the facts and the legal standards, however we are unable to reach THAT JUDGMENT

You have a legal investigation that clearly states that they have no confidence that Trump did not commit obstruction of justice

I know that there are a lot of negatives in that sentence but they are the bad kind of negatives which stated that the investigators believe he committed a crime. A crime that he would have been indicted for in a regular court and if he wasn't the president.

If you believe that he did not commit a crime that is your prerogative
people still believe that OJ did it but he was tried and found not guilty

Its up to the house to impeach and the Senate to convict

The Mueller report has all the proof it needs

 

[Billy_Bob]

There have been plenty of Trump Humpers indicted already.

For nothing having anything to do with Trump. You've got nothing, you just cannot accept it.

Keep telling yourself that, one day you might believe it.

For somebody who doesn't have enough time to post any of the "evidence" you claim there is, you're sure spending a lot of time claiming there IS evidence.

It must be Adam the liar Schiff... lots of talk and not one shred of evidence to back his lies up..

 

[Billy_Bob]

The OLC has issued an opinion finding that the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its function. Mueller office accepted OLC legal conclusion concerning prosecution of Trump

So what? Concluding that he can't indict a sitting President does not prevent him from declaring that Trump obstructed justice. So why didn't he?

If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the fats that the President clearly did NOT commit obstruction of justice, we would so STATE. Based on the facts and the legal standards, however we are unable to reach THAT JUDGMENT.

Mueller was not looking for exculpatory evidence, so naturally he is not going to find any. His job was not to prove Trump's innocence, it was to prove his guilt (which he clearly failed to do). So don't give me that bullshit that there's "plenty of evidence of obstruction against Trump". There is none and you know it.

If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the fats that the President clearly did NOT commit obstruction of justice, we would so STATE. Based on the facts and the legal standards, however we are unable to reach THAT JUDGMENT

You have a legal investigation that clearly states that they have no confidence that Trump did not commit obstruction of justice

I know that there are a lot of negatives in that sentence but they are the bad kind of negatives which stated that the investigators believe he committed a crime. A crime that he would have been indicted for in a regular court and if he wasn't the president.

If you believe that he did not commit a crime that is your prerogative
people still believe that OJ did it but he was tried and found not guilty

Its up to the house to impeach and the Senate to convict

The Mueller report has all the proof it needs

The DOJ was tasked with the final determination, under the law.. Barr and Rosenstine in consultation with Mueller made the final decision of no criminal obstruction and declined to prosecute..

You folks can go pound sand.. ITS OVER... Get your crying done and put on your big boy panties..

 

[Billy_Bob]

Dispute erupts over whether Brennan, Comey pushed Steele dossier, as DOJ probe into misconduct begins
​

Dispute erupts over whether Brennan, Comey pushed Steele dossier, as DOJ probe into misconduct begins
05/15/2019 | Greg Re, Catherine Herrige
A high-level dispute over which senior government officials pushed the unverified Steele dossier amid efforts to surveil the Trump campaign has broken out into the open again, after it emerged that Attorney General William Barr appointed a U.S. attorney to examine the origins of the Russia investigation and determine if the FBI and DOJ's actions were "lawful and appropriate." Sources familiar with the records told Fox News that a late-2016 email chain indicated then-FBI Director James Comey told bureau subordinates that then-CIA Director John Brennan insisted the dossier be included in the intelligence community assessment on Russian interference, known as the ICA.
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathleen Kavalec’s written account of her meeting with Steele on Oct. 11, 2016, was sent to the FBI prior to the bureau's FISA warrant application to monitor Page, according to records unearthed in a transparency lawsuit by Citizens United.

~~~~~~
Indeed, the Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats are trying to change the story. They are going to throw Comey to the wolves and make sure the investigation dies with that.
Barack Hussein Obama, James Clapper, John Brennan, James Comey.....100% guilty candidates for “Orange Jump Suits” and forever lasting prison terms. All of them, plus adding Hillary Clinton are Traitors and Turncoats to the USA Republican and all its people!!! Case closed.
No doubt the prime persons of interest are now looking to blame the others. Let the blood bath begin. Who will be the first to blame the others? There's reason to believe that Comey or Brennan have very incriminating tapes they are saving as their get out of jail free cards.
Surely A.G. Barr and Durham know the truth but want the public to witness the lefts lies.

~~~~~~
Italy has flipped on Brennan, turning over Joseph Mifsud ...
Italy has flipped on Brennan, turning over Joseph Mifsud… – CITIZEN FREE PRESS
Italy has flipped and are giving up Brennan. — George Papadopoulos (@GeorgePapa19) May 16, 2019 . The Italian prime minister has suddenly requested resignations from 6 deputy directors of Italian intelligence agencies: DIS, AISI and AISE. This was all after I outed Mifsud in Rome and the president called the Italian prime minister. Italy has flipped and are giving up Brennan.

The light is beginning to shine through the darkness and the truth will rise to the surface. The coup has failed and the diabolical and wicked treasonous traitors will all be exposed in the open with no place to hide. Stay Frosty.....

Brennen and Clapper have nowhere to hide. And it may go much deeper and up the chain to Obama. Interesting that Obama is MIA and vacationing abroad indefinitely... I haven't heard much from the Clinton's either..

 

[Superbadbrutha]

There have been plenty of Trump Humpers indicted already.

For nothing having anything to do with Trump. You've got nothing, you just cannot accept it.

Keep telling yourself that, one day you might believe it.

For somebody who doesn't have enough time to post any of the "evidence" you claim there is, you're sure spending a lot of time claiming there IS evidence.

It must be Adam the liar Schiff... lots of talk and not one shred of evidence to back his lies up..

How in the hell can a Trump Humper call anyone a liar.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

How in the hell can a Trump Humper call anyone a liar.

You make it easy.

 

[S.J.]

The OLC has issued an opinion finding that the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its function. Mueller office accepted OLC legal conclusion concerning prosecution of Trump

So what? Concluding that he can't indict a sitting President does not prevent him from declaring that Trump obstructed justice. So why didn't he?

If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the fats that the President clearly did NOT commit obstruction of justice, we would so STATE. Based on the facts and the legal standards, however we are unable to reach THAT JUDGMENT.

Mueller was not looking for exculpatory evidence, so naturally he is not going to find any. His job was not to prove Trump's innocence, it was to prove his guilt (which he clearly failed to do). So don't give me that bullshit that there's "plenty of evidence of obstruction against Trump". There is none and you know it.

If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the fats that the President clearly did NOT commit obstruction of justice, we would so STATE. Based on the facts and the legal standards, however we are unable to reach THAT JUDGMENT

You have a legal investigation that clearly states that they have no confidence that Trump did not commit obstruction of justice

I know that there are a lot of negatives in that sentence but they are the bad kind of negatives which stated that the investigators believe he committed a crime. A crime that he would have been indicted for in a regular court and if he wasn't the president.

If you believe that he did not commit a crime that is your prerogative
people still believe that OJ did it but he was tried and found not guilty

Its up to the house to impeach and the Senate to convict

The Mueller report has all the proof it needs

I'm gonna explain it to you one more time. Mueller (as hard as he tried) did not find enough evidence to indict anyone for collusion OR obstruction, and he did not (as hard as he tried) find enough evidence to recommend impeachment. Face the facts, this was a failed attempt to frame the President, and soon those who participated in the frame-up will have to answer for their crimes. I know it's difficult for you to accept but you've got nothing, and your coup is over. The only thing left is to round up and prosecute the criminals who put our country through this failed attempt to overthrow a sitting President.

 

[BWK]

Dispute erupts over whether Brennan, Comey pushed Steele dossier, as DOJ probe into misconduct begins
​

Dispute erupts over whether Brennan, Comey pushed Steele dossier, as DOJ probe into misconduct begins
05/15/2019 | Greg Re, Catherine Herrige
A high-level dispute over which senior government officials pushed the unverified Steele dossier amid efforts to surveil the Trump campaign has broken out into the open again, after it emerged that Attorney General William Barr appointed a U.S. attorney to examine the origins of the Russia investigation and determine if the FBI and DOJ's actions were "lawful and appropriate." Sources familiar with the records told Fox News that a late-2016 email chain indicated then-FBI Director James Comey told bureau subordinates that then-CIA Director John Brennan insisted the dossier be included in the intelligence community assessment on Russian interference, known as the ICA.
Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathleen Kavalec’s written account of her meeting with Steele on Oct. 11, 2016, was sent to the FBI prior to the bureau's FISA warrant application to monitor Page, according to records unearthed in a transparency lawsuit by Citizens United.

~~~~~~
Indeed, the Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrats are trying to change the story. They are going to throw Comey to the wolves and make sure the investigation dies with that.
Barack Hussein Obama, James Clapper, John Brennan, James Comey.....100% guilty candidates for “Orange Jump Suits” and forever lasting prison terms. All of them, plus adding Hillary Clinton are Traitors and Turncoats to the USA Republican and all its people!!! Case closed.
No doubt the prime persons of interest are now looking to blame the others. Let the blood bath begin. Who will be the first to blame the others? There's reason to believe that Comey or Brennan have very incriminating tapes they are saving as their get out of jail free cards.
Surely A.G. Barr and Durham know the truth but want the public to witness the lefts lies.

The law does not dispute it. It's only the Trump toads who do.

 

[BWK]

The OLC has issued an opinion finding that the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its function. Mueller office accepted OLC legal conclusion concerning prosecution of Trump

So what? Concluding that he can't indict a sitting President does not prevent him from declaring that Trump obstructed justice. So why didn't he?

If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the fats that the President clearly did NOT commit obstruction of justice, we would so STATE. Based on the facts and the legal standards, however we are unable to reach THAT JUDGMENT.

Mueller was not looking for exculpatory evidence, so naturally he is not going to find any. His job was not to prove Trump's innocence, it was to prove his guilt (which he clearly failed to do). So don't give me that bullshit that there's "plenty of evidence of obstruction against Trump". There is none and you know it.

If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the fats that the President clearly did NOT commit obstruction of justice, we would so STATE. Based on the facts and the legal standards, however we are unable to reach THAT JUDGMENT

You have a legal investigation that clearly states that they have no confidence that Trump did not commit obstruction of justice

I know that there are a lot of negatives in that sentence but they are the bad kind of negatives which stated that the investigators believe he committed a crime. A crime that he would have been indicted for in a regular court and if he wasn't the president.

If you believe that he did not commit a crime that is your prerogative
people still believe that OJ did it but he was tried and found not guilty

Its up to the house to impeach and the Senate to convict

The Mueller report has all the proof it needs

I'm gonna explain it to you one more time. Mueller (as hard as he tried) did not find enough evidence to indict anyone for collusion OR obstruction, and he did not (as hard as he tried) find enough evidence to recommend impeachment. Face the facts, this was a failed attempt to frame the President, and soon those who participated in the frame-up will have to answer for their crimes. I know it's difficult for you to accept but you've got nothing, and your coup is over. The only thing left is to round up and prosecute the criminals who put our country through this failed attempt to overthrow a sitting President.

In the Mueller report, Mueller left it up to Congress. And with this latest Flynn evidence, obstruction has been solidified and proven. The truth has you by the balls and there is nothing you can do about it;

 

[BWK]

These clowns could have just accepted the election results and walked away...but nooo...they had to double down on stupid.

The only clowns in this equation are the Trump toads who ignore the rule of law, the Constitution, and the evidence against this mobster Trump;

 

[Oddball]

The OLC has issued an opinion finding that the indictment or criminal prosecution of a sitting President would undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its function. Mueller office accepted OLC legal conclusion concerning prosecution of Trump

So what? Concluding that he can't indict a sitting President does not prevent him from declaring that Trump obstructed justice. So why didn't he?

If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the fats that the President clearly did NOT commit obstruction of justice, we would so STATE. Based on the facts and the legal standards, however we are unable to reach THAT JUDGMENT.

Mueller was not looking for exculpatory evidence, so naturally he is not going to find any. His job was not to prove Trump's innocence, it was to prove his guilt (which he clearly failed to do). So don't give me that bullshit that there's "plenty of evidence of obstruction against Trump". There is none and you know it.

If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the fats that the President clearly did NOT commit obstruction of justice, we would so STATE. Based on the facts and the legal standards, however we are unable to reach THAT JUDGMENT

You have a legal investigation that clearly states that they have no confidence that Trump did not commit obstruction of justice

I know that there are a lot of negatives in that sentence but they are the bad kind of negatives which stated that the investigators believe he committed a crime. A crime that he would have been indicted for in a regular court and if he wasn't the president.

If you believe that he did not commit a crime that is your prerogative
people still believe that OJ did it but he was tried and found not guilty

Its up to the house to impeach and the Senate to convict

The Mueller report has all the proof it needs

I'm gonna explain it to you one more time. Mueller (as hard as he tried) did not find enough evidence to indict anyone for collusion OR obstruction, and he did not (as hard as he tried) find enough evidence to recommend impeachment. Face the facts, this was a failed attempt to frame the President, and soon those who participated in the frame-up will have to answer for their crimes. I know it's difficult for you to accept but you've got nothing, and your coup is over. The only thing left is to round up and prosecute the criminals who put our country through this failed attempt to overthrow a sitting President.

In the Mueller report, Mueller left it up to Congress. And with this latest Flynn evidence, obstruction has been solidified and proven. The truth has you by the balls and there is nothing you can do about it;

The Mule's job wasn't to leave it up to congress, cement head.

 

[Oddball]

These clowns could have just accepted the election results and walked away...but nooo...they had to double down on stupid.

The only clowns in this equation are the Trump toads who ignore the rule of law, the Constitution, and the evidence against this mobster Trump;