NotfooledbyW
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 26,285
- 5,530
- 245
Not loves to do shit like that,
Point to specifics, liar. You have none.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not loves to do shit like that,
He answered that in the portion of the post you cut away.
He answered that in the portion of the post you cut away.
AT THE TIME, the intelligence we had on hand had Iraq as a threat.
He answered that in the portion of the post you cut away.
That was an asshole move on your part, to cut away his post, ask a question, or should I say, "ask" a "question",
and then talk on and on, just spewing additional leftard talking points, instead of waiting for the answer, which we both know you don't care about, because you question was not really a question.
Point to specifics, liar. You have none.
Point to what you think was the answer.
Do you ever get tired of pissing and moaning about format issues?
Thats your entire post and not one reference to a fact that you can confirm or deny can be found.
We've spent months discussing the issues of the war.
the bit
The part you cut, because leaving it there made your question look stupid. YOu know which part that was.
You trust and love for the UN shines above your hatred for Bush. This is the same organization whose “peacekeepers” rape and abuse children and overlook human rights violations by third world despots. Show us how the inspectors are not corrupt.Why was Iraq a threat with 200 UN inspectors on the ground with Iraq cooperating as it had never done before.
W didn’t believe that an Iraq hat was peacefully disarmed of WMD was a threat specifically when that status was verified by the UNSC upon completion of inspections. It was W that forced the end of inspections in March 2003. It was not SH.
So how do you accept the notion that Iraq was a threat knowing that W was wrong about WMD?
That question is not a matter of having 20-20 hindsight because the inspectors on the ground in Iraq with Iraq’s full cooperation for several months is what eliminated the only credible threat that leaving SH in power posed.
If W truly had solid intelligence from somewhere on the planet he obligated America to turn it over to the inspectors. Yes W obligated America to share intelligence such as that with the UN. Had he done so the inspectors would have shot it down rather quickly because there was no WMD being hidden.
You trust and love for the UN shines above your hatred for Bush.
You trust and love for the UN
Show us how the inspectors are not corrupt.
Also, the bit where I point out that I can teach you to be a better advocate for Peace, or at least, more restraint on War, with TWO WORDS,
Yet you question my morality.
He asks, AFTER cutting the portion of the post were I explain what I said.
Show us how the inspectors are not corrupt.
Do you actually believe the myth that @struth repeated is true. That actual WMD was found?
IMO, the WMDs, ie large stockpiles of chemical weapons and/or nuclear weapons materials, were NOT found in anything like the manner or scale that we expected.
Do you have specific charges against the 200 Inspectors who were working to disarm Iraq peacefully in 2003 until W forced them to leave?