What's to admit? I've always held that position.So to be clear you want politics to influence science. I'm glad you at least admitted it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What's to admit? I've always held that position.So to be clear you want politics to influence science. I'm glad you at least admitted it.
Good for you.What's to admit? I've always held that position.
Yes, it is. I am being consistent in saying that biology determines if a person is a man or a woman, not politics. Likewise, biology dictates that an unborn baby is human, not politics, and on it goes.Good for you.
Actually, you do not and you are posting misinformation, not the first time for you.I do.
No you aren't. Do you want me to quote for you again where you said you want politics, rather than biology to influence science? I can.Yes, it is. I am being consistent in saying that biology determines if a person is a man or a woman, not politics.
Depends on what point we are in the developmental stage. Embryos and fetuses aren't babies.Likewise, biology dictates that an unborn baby is human, not politics, and on it goes.
Sure, I'd like to see that quote. I may have changed my mind about something. And unborn babies are humans at an early stage of development.No you aren't. Do you want me to quote for you again where you said you want politics, rather than biology to influence science? I can.
Depends on what point we are in the developmental stage. Embryos and fetuses aren't babies.
What the law allows and what the physicians doing the surgery require before they are comfortable performing such procedures require are two different things.Actually, you do not and you are posting misinformation, not the first time for you.
Which states are you talking about that require one year of counseling prior to consideration of gender surgery?
Both the states of Washington and California, under liberal leadership, are allowing teenagers to have bottom surgeries without parental permission. California has made a law by Newsom allowing teenagers from any other state to go to California and have a transgender surgery without parental permission. This is absolutely crossing the line for states rights. It’s one thing to be a governor of a state and if you have a majority of voters backing you to make a law for minors within that state, but this oversteps his authority.
I cannot imagine that the Republicans and conservatives living in California are OK with this law. Legalizing a life-altering decision for teenagers is bad enough, adding in the without parental consent and then encouraging teenagers to go to CA for the procedure state from other states? No.
BREAKING: Newsom signs bill to allow minors from other states to receive medical gender transitions without parental consent | Winter Watch
PM. | Sept. 30,2022 On Thursday, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law a piece of legislation that will designate the state as a sanctuary for children and teens seeking medicalized gender transitions. Newsom’s signature on the bill, SB 107, comes nearly a month after the California...www.winterwatch.net
Voters need to contact their state representatives immediately over this horrendous law. If California voters want to go full on leftist by all means do it, but keep the other states’ minors out of it with selective life changing procedures that cannot be undone.
What's a male voice?You’re also wrong to say that the hormonal treatment doesn’t produce unchangeable results. It absolutely does. There is evidence from those who decided it was a huge mistake following their surgery and one female will always have a male voice now.
They can do all of those with parental permission. And the earliest recommendation for top surgery is 16 not 13. There's a giant difference between those ages. At 16 I owned a car and had a full time job.What else can minors do in California without parental permission; can they go to an R-rated movie at 13 without having to sneak in? Can a teenager have a foot removed without parental permission?
Because they're responsible medical professionals.Why isn’t this being pushed with the AMA within liberal California yet?
Red Herrings aren't rational retorts. Try discussing the topic at hand.Why not say that all teenagers can decide if they want go to school or not and they can make that decision at 13-as a teenager.
The research actually shows the earlier trans teens get on hormone therapy the better puberty exacerbates the disassociation they have between their identities and their bodies.This will not end well for teenagers regarding developmental growth. Teenagers are in capable of making fully aware decisions until around the age of 23 when the brainstem connects fully with a frontal lobe. Studies have proved this over and over regarding stages of brain development.
No problem.Sure, I'd like to see that quote. I may have changed my mind about something. And unborn babies are humans at an early stage of development.
And your response....So to be clear you want politics to influence science. I'm glad you at least admitted it.
What's to admit? I've always held that position.
1. I am smart.
2. You're the one who tried (and failed) to effectively identify argumentative fallacies. It's not my fault you don't have a firm grasp on them.
3. Chemistry is one aspect of physics and biology (the study of living organisms) is made possible by chemical reactions.
Real life tragedy that should have been avoided: “When Chloe was 12 years old, she decided she was transgender. At 13, she came out to her parents. That same year, she was put on puberty blockers and prescribed testosterone. At 15, she underwent a double mastectomy. Less than a year later, she realized she’d made a mistake — all by the time she was 16 years old.”What the law allows and what the physicians doing the surgery require before they are comfortable performing such procedures require are two different things.
What's a male voice?
They can do all of those with parental permission. And the earliest recommendation for top surgery is 16 not 13. There's a giant difference between those ages. At 16 I owned a car and had a full time job.
Because they're responsible medical professionals.
Red Herrings aren't rational retorts. Try discussing the topic at hand.
The research actually shows the earlier trans teens get on hormone therapy the better puberty exacerbates the disassociation they have between their identities and their bodies.
I never suggested at all that one should assume every medical professional is ethical.Real life tragedy that should have been avoided: “When Chloe was 12 years old, she decided she was transgender. At 13, she came out to her parents. That same year, she was put on puberty blockers and prescribed testosterone. At 15, she underwent a double mastectomy. Less than a year later, she realized she’d made a mistake — all by the time she was 16 years old.”
‘I literally lost organs:’ Why detransitioned teens regret changing genders
A look at the alarming rise of teens who are changing genders and then “detransitioning” back.nypost.com
There are many other real-life examples, I just happened to find this one linked first. Google -teenagers regretting transition surgery- see what you come up with on your own.
Hormonal treatment for a transitioning female to male thickens vocal cords thereby making the voice much deeper in pitch. One young female mentioned regretting her surgery and regretting that she would always have “a male voice”. While listening to her she sounded like a male. The phrase “male voice” has been used in court of law testimony many times over, no need to play ignorant.
It is a naïve statement to suggest that
all medical professionals are ethical in their decision making process. “Responsible medical professionals” do not disregard parental concerns about elective life-changing procedures on minors, especially when so many regret the decision following the procedure. These individuals are forming support groups because they have no support from the LBQT community. Doesn’t sound like total acceptance is truly their message when they offer no support for people who regret transitioning. Those who regret having the surgery are shunned by LBTQ community because it does not support their messaging.
Yup, I read that wrong. I'll own that one, it was certainly a mistake because I think the opposite, but I said it.No problem.
And your response....
Life altering medical decisions that are elective should occur after a person has the capacity to make this decision. As I’ve stated, around the age of 23 most adults reach this capacity.I never suggested at all that one should assume every medical professional is ethical.
This is an excerpt from the article you linked to.
Experts worry that many young people seeking to transition are doing so without a proper mental-health evaluation. Among them is Dr. Erica Anderson, a clinical psychologist specializing in gender, sexuality and identity. A transgender woman herself, Anderson has helped hundreds of young people navigate the transition journey over the past 30 years. Anderson supports the methodical, milestone-filled process lasting anywhere from a few months to several years to undergo transition. Today, however, she’s worried that some young people are being medicalized without the proper restraint or oversight.
I agree with all of this. Responsible medical professionals have a duty to ensure that their patients are making informed decisions about transitioning and research using MRIs to confirm diagnosis can only improve the ability of physicians to make better decisions with regards to treatment for their patients. Nowhere at all in your article is any credence given to the notion that gender dysphoria isn't real or that transitioning can be helpful to many people.
Only you guys keep bringing it up? why is that?Dr. Bhavik Kumar made the remarks during a hearing on the Democrat-controlled Committee that was intended to push the narrative that restricting abortion access can harm women.
In response to a question from Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA), Kumar, medical director for primary and trans care at Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast claimed, “Men can have pregnancies, especially trans men.”
“Somebody with a uterus may have the capability of becoming pregnant, whether they’re a woman or a man,” Kumar claimed. “That doesn’t make a difference.”
I'm gonna say it...
Men cannot get pregnant.
Does anyone disagree? If you agree, just await responses as I am.
I acknowledge you've stated this. I agree with the first sentence I'm not quite convinced about the second. Though I will concede the issue involves a lot of complexity and there is no one size fits all answer. I found this study on the issue of decision making in children and adolescents interesting and I agree there needs to be rigious examination before any physician considers surgery for minors, with or without parental consent.Life altering medical decisions that are elective should occur after a person has the capacity to make this decision. As I’ve stated, around the age of 23 most adults reach this capacity.
To be more specific in the largely west Indian community I grew up most young adults had jobs, not necessarily cars and were expected to be contributing financially to the household.You previously mentioned that you had a job and a car at 16. Everyone knows at least a few teenagers (reality shows the majority of US teenagers) who do not have control over their emotions, nor the intellectual foresight to plan out their whole lives. Many own cars and have jobs. Within context, your statement suggests you believe that owning a car and having a job proves something, what does it prove? Be specific.
You haven't posted any data suggesting most people can't make rational decisions concerning their health until 23.The law of averages are against you, no matter how you rephrase my words.
I never suggested at all that one should assume every medical professional is ethical.
This is an excerpt from the article you linked to.
Experts worry that many young people seeking to transition are doing so without a proper mental-health evaluation. Among them is Dr. Erica Anderson, a clinical psychologist specializing in gender, sexuality and identity. A transgender woman herself, Anderson has helped hundreds of young people navigate the transition journey over the past 30 years. Anderson supports the methodical, milestone-filled process lasting anywhere from a few months to several years to undergo transition. Today, however, she’s worried that some young people are being medicalized without the proper restraint or oversight.
I agree with all of this. Responsible medical professionals have a duty to ensure that their patients are making informed decisions about transitioning and research using MRIs to confirm diagnosis can only improve the ability of physicians to make better decisions with regards to treatment for their patients. Nowhere at all in your article is any credence given to the notion that gender dysphoria isn't real or that transitioning can be helpful to many people.
Because it keeps on being pushed for some odd reason. Why is that?Only you guys keep bringing it up? why is that?